Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.7843/kgs.2022.38.5.19

Verification of the Seismic Performance Evaluation Methods for Enclosure Dam  

Kim, Kwangjoon (Dept. of Civil and Environmental Eng., Wonkwang Univ.)
Kim, Hyunguk (Korea Authority of Land & Infrastructure Safety)
Kim, Sung-Ryul (Dept. of Civil and Environmental Eng., Seoul National Univ.)
Lee, Jinsun (Dept. of Civil and Environmental Eng., Wonkwang Univ.)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society / v.38, no.5, 2022 , pp. 19-33 More about this Journal
Abstract
Newmark's sliding block analysis is the most commonly used method for predicting earthquake-induced permanent displacement of embankment slopes. Additionally, it yields the amount of slip circle sliding using the limit equilibrium theory. Thus, permanent displacement does not occur until the seismic load exceeds the yield acceleration, which induces sliding of the slip circle. The evolution of Newmark's sliding block analysis has been made by introducing the numerical seismic response analysis results since it was introduced. This study compares seismic performance evaluation results for the example enclosure dam section with the analysis methods. As a result, earthquake-induced permanent displacement using Newmark's sliding block analysis did not occur for the enclosure dam, indicating a high safety factor. However, nonlinear response history analysis gave reasonable results.
Keywords
Enclosure dam; Levee; Liquefaction; Newmark's sliding block analysis; Seismic performance evaluation; Slope stability;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) (2016), Engineering and Design Earthquake Design and Evaluation for Civil Works Projects:ER 1110-2-1806.
2 Korea Infrastructure Safety & Technology Corporation (KALIS) (2021), Seismic Performance Evaluation Guideline for Existing Structure (Embankment and Enclosure Dam), Available at: https://www.kalis.or.kr/wpge/m_373/info/info100107.do (in Korean).
3 American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2017), Minimum design and associate criteria for buildings and other structures, ASCE standard no. 7-16.
4 British Standards Institution (BSI) (2005), Eurocode 8. Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, Part 5: Foundations, Retaining Structures and Geotechnical Aspects: BS EN 1998-5:2004.
5 British Standards Institution (BSI) (2005), Eurocode 8. Design of structures for earthquake resistance, part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for build ings: BS EN 1998-1:2004.
6 Chopra, A. K. (1966), Earthquake effect on dams, University of California, BErkeley.
7 EAK (2000), Greek code for seismic resistant structures, Organization of seismic resistant planning and protection, Athens, in Greek.
8 Hashash, Y.M.A., Musgrove, M.I., Harmon, J.A., Ilhan, O., Xing, G., Numanoglu, O., Groholski, D.R., Phillips, C.A., and Park, D. (2020), DEEPSOIL 7.0, User Manual. Urbana, IL, Board of Trustees of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Available at: http://deepsoil.cee.illinois.edu
9 Ishibashi, I. and Zhang, X. (1993), Unified Dynamic Shear Moduli and Damping Ratio of Sand and Clay, Soil and Foundationsm, 1993, Vol.33, No.1, pp.182-191.   DOI
10 Kim, D. S. and Choo, Y. W. (2001), Dynamic Deformation Characteristics of Cohesionless Soils Using Resonant Column Test, Korea Geotechnical Society, Vol.17, No.5, pp.115-128 (in Korean).
11 Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (2019), Design of a sea level reclamation seawall KDS 67 65 20: 2019, in Korean.
12 Korea Rural Community Corporation (KRC) (1994), Comprehensive report on the Saemangeum Reclamation Comprehensive Development Survey Design (in Korean).
13 Lee, J. H., Park, D. H., Ahn, J. K., and Park, D. H. (2015), Development of Permanent Displacement Model for Seismic Mountain Slope, J. of the Korean Geotechnical Society, Vol.31, No.4, pp. 57-66.   DOI
14 Makdisi, F.I. and Seed, H.B. (1977), A Simplified Procedure for Estimating Earthquake-indeced Deformations in Dams and Embankments, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report No. UCB/EERC-77/19. UC California, Berkley.
15 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT) (2018), General Seismic Design KDS 17 10 00: 2018 (in Korean).
16 Mejia, L. H. and Dawson, E. M. (2006), Earthquake deconvolution for FLAC. Proceedings of 4th International FLAC Symposium on Numerical Modeling in Geomechanics. Madrid. Spain. ISBN 0-9767577-0-2. 2006;4-10.
17 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLITT) (2013), Tsunami Resistance Design Guidelines for seawalls (chest walls) in Ports and harbors (in Japanese).
18 Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (MLITT) (2016), Guidelines and explanations for seismic performance inspection of river structures (in Japanese).
19 Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries (MOF) (2016), Design standards for coastal facilities (in Korean).
20 Ministry of the Interior and Safety (MOIS) (2017), Common Applications of Seismic Design Standards (in Korean).
21 Spencer, E. (1968), A Method of Analysis of the Stability of Embankments Assuming Parallel Inter-Slice Forces, Geotechnique, Vol.18, No.3, pp.384-386.   DOI
22 per le Costruzione, N. T. (2018), Aggiornamento delle Norme tecniche per le costruzioni, Gazzetta Ufficiale Serie Generale, (42) (in Italian).
23 Newmark, N. M., D.Sc., Ph.D., M. S., M.I.C.E. (1965), Effects of Earthquakes on Dams and Embankments, Geotechnique, Vol.15, No.2, pp.139-160. DOI:10.1680/geot.1965.15.2.139.   DOI
24 Rollins, K. M., Singh, M., and Roy, J. (2020), Simplified Equations for Shear-Modulus Degradation and Damping of Gravels, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol.146, No.9, 04020076. DOI:10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0002300.   DOI
25 Seed, H. B., Wong, R. T., Idriss, I. M., and Tokimatsu, K. (1986), Moduli and Damping Factors for Dynamic Analyses of Cohesionless Soils, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol.112, No.11, pp. 1016-1032. DOI:10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1986)112:11(1016).   DOI
26 Special Act on The Safety Control and Maintenance of Establishments, 17551 § 21(2020). Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport.
27 Tide embankment Managemet Act. 17317. § 2-3 (2020), Ministry of Agrifulture, Food and Rural Affairs.
28 American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2000), Seismic analysis of safety-related nuclear structures: ASCE 4-98.
29 Geoslope International (2021), Dynamic Earthquake Modeling with Geostudio, Available at: http://www.geoslope.com
30 Japanese road association (2012), Road bridge specification.commentary to dynamics, V, Seismic design.
31 Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries (MOF) (1999), Seismic Design Standards for Ports and Fishery Harbors Facilities (in Korean).
32 Kramer, S. L. (1996), Geotechnical earthquake engineering, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
33 Lee, J.S, Liu, Q.H., and Park, H.J. (2019), Effect of Earthquake Motion on the Permanent Displacement of Embankment Slopes, KSCE J. of civil engineering, Vol.23, No.10, pp.4174-4189. DOI 10.1007/s12205-019-1833-0.   DOI
34 Masing, G. (1926), Eigenspannungen und Verfestigung beim Messing, Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Applied Mechanics, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 332-335 (in German). c1926.
35 Seismosoft (2021, April 13), Earthquake Engineering Software Solutions. Retrieved August 30, 2021, from https://seismosoft.com/
36 Standards New Zealand (SNZ) (2004), Structural design actions - part 5: earthquake actions - New Zealand (NZS1170.5:2004).
37 Vucetic, M. and Dobry, R. (1991), Effect of Soil Plasticity on Cyclic Response, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol.117, No.1, pp.89-107. DOI:10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1991)117:1(89).   DOI