Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2019.43.6.395

A Review of Human Element Issues of Remote Operators on Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships  

Kim, Hong-Tae (Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering)
Yang, Young-Hoon (Korea Research Institute of Ships & Ocean Engineering)
Abstract
The development and operation of the MASS (Maritime Autonomous Surface Ship) is being actively discussed for more efficient and safer maritime transportation solutions. The autonomous navigation technology has positive aspects such as the prevention of marine accidents, improvement of fuel efficiency of ships and cost reduction, and negative aspects such as job loss, task change, and security problems. It is expected that there will be new human element issues such as the situation awareness of remote operators, because the shore-based control will be conducted when fully autonomous ships are in operation. In this paper, we consider major human element issues that should be factored in the development and operation of MASS, and suggest a method of HRA (Human Reliability Analysis) for P IFs (Performance Influencing Factors) of the remote operators that are expected according to the shore-based control.
Keywords
Maritime Autonomous Surface Ship; Human Centered Design; Remote Operator; Crew Training; Human Element;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Rodseth, O. J. and Burmeister, H. C.(2012), "Development toward the Unmanned Ship, Proceedings of International Symposium Information on Ships", ISIS 2012, Hamburg, Germany, August 30-31.
2 Rolls Royce(2016), "The Ear of Ship Intelligence", (http://www.rolls-royce.com)
3 Shanghai Maritime University(2018), Research on the Impacts of Marine Autonomous Surface Ship on the Seafarer's Career and MET, Technical Report.
4 Seo, Y. S.(2018), A technical prospects and trends in MASS, Vol. 18-4, KEIT PD Issue Report.
5 WMU(2019), Transport 2040:Automation, Technology, Employment - The Future of Work, World Maritime University.
6 Yoon, H. S.(2018), National policy of maritime autonomous surface ship, Policy Seminar on Maritime Autonomous Surface Ship, Korea Maritime Institute.
7 Ahvenjarvi, S.(2016), The Human Element and Autonomous Ships, International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 517-521.   DOI
8 Baldauf, M., Mejia Jr., M., Chong, J. and Amphanthongpaphakul, T. (2018), Conventional Vessels and Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships - studying, operational challenges of future traffic scenarios, 20th International Navigation Simulator Lecturers Conference. Auckland (NZ)
9 Bureau Veritas(2017), Guidelines for Autonomous Shipping, BV Guidance Note.
10 Chang, H. J.(2019), Promising jobs in the era of the 4th Industrial Revolution, MK News.
11 Hone, R. N.(2019), Training Standards and Accreditation, The 4th Maritime Autonomous Systems Regulatory conference, UK Chamber of Shipping.
12 Chong, J. C.(2018), Impact of maritime autonomous surface ships (MASS) on VTS operations, World Maritime University Dissertations.
13 D'agostini, E., Ryoo, D. K. and Jo, S. H.(2017), A Study on Korean Seafarer's Perceptions Towards Unmanned Ships, Journal of Korean Navigation and Port Research, Vol. 41, No. 6, pp. 195-200.
14 DNV.GL(2018), Autonomous and remotely operated ships, DNV.GL Class Guideline.
15 IMO(2018), "Framework for The Regulatory Scoping Exercise", MSC 99/WP.9.
16 Jang, H. S.(2018), Core technologies of maritime autonomous surface ship, Policy Seminar on Maritime Autonomous Surface Ship, Korea Maritime Institute.
17 JSMEA(2017), Activities of Smart Ship Application Platform 2 Project (SSAP2), Japan Ship Machinery and Equipment Association.
18 Choi, J. H. and Lee, S. I.(2018), Interpretive Consideration relating to the Ship's Definition of the Unmanned Ship, Ocean Policy Research, Vol. 33, No. 1, pp. 171-191.   DOI
19 Kim, K. S.(2018), Impacts of maritime autonomous surface ship on the seafarer and seafarer's position, Policy Seminar on Maritime Autonomous Surface Ship, Korea Maritime Institute.
20 Laurinnen, M.(2016), Advanced Autonomous Waterborne Applications Initiative, AAWA Seminar, Helsinki, Finland.
21 Man, Y. et al.(2018), Human factor issues during remote ship monitoring tasks: An ecological lesson for system design in a distributed context, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 68, pp. 231-244.   DOI
22 Lee, W. J.(2018), The trends of shipbuilding industry for smart ship, TTA Journal, Vol. 178.
23 Lloyd's Register(2017), Cyber Enabled Ships ShipRight Procedure, A Lloyd's Register guidance document.
24 Man, Y. et al.(2015), From Desk to Field - Human Factor Issues in Remote Monitoring and Controlling of Autonomous Unmanned Vessels , 6th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics. (AHFE 2015)
25 Mylly, M.(2019), EU & EMSA Update, The 4th Maritime Autonomous Systems Regulatory conference, UK Chamber of Shipping.
26 MUNIN(2017), Research in maritime autonomous systems project Results and technology potentials, 7th Framework Programme Grant Agreement No 314286. (www.unmanned-ship.org/munin/)
27 NFAS(2017), Definitions for Autonomous Merchant Ships, Norwegian Forum for Autonomous Ships.
28 Park, H.(2017), A Review on Autonomous Vehicles Focused on Human Factors, Journal of Ergonomics Society of Korea, Vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 421-435.
29 Park, H. R., Park, H. S. and Kim, B. R.(2018), A Study on the Policy Directions related to the Introduction of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ship (MASS), KMI Report.
30 Porathe, T., Prison, J. and Man, Y.(2014), Situation awareness in remote control centres for unmanned ships, Human Factors in Ship Design & Operation, UK.
31 Lloyd, J.(2019), Marine autonomous ship regulation next step - people!, The 4th Maritime Autonomous Systems Regulatory conference, UK Chamber of Shipping.
32 Ramos, M. A., Utne, I. B. and Mosleh, A.(2018), On factors affecting autonomous ships operators performance in a Shore Control Center, Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management(PSAM 14), USA.