Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2007.31.4.295

A Study on the Practical Means to Prevent Collision at Sea - Through risk management theory -  

Lee, Ok-Yong (Korea Institute of Maritime and Fisheries Technology)
Grewal, Devinder (Department of Maritime and Logistics Management, Australian Maritime College)
Cahoon, Stephen (Department of Maritime and Logistics Management, Australian Maritime College)
Publication Information
Journal of Navigation and Port Research / v.31, no.4, 2007 , pp. 295-307 More about this Journal
Abstract
The statistics of Korean Maritime Safety Tribunal and Japan Marine Accidents Inquiry Agency shows that the major muses of collision at sea are Improper lookout and Non-compliance with marine traffic rules. Those two muses are occupying more than 70% of collision, and it's clear that those muses are undoubtedly closely related to simple human error. In this paper we tried to find out the root muses of this kind of human error of OOWs(officers on watch) through risk identification method and studied how to tackle them via risk control theory. In conclusion, the measures studied in this paper could be applied to help OOWs avoid their own human error as well as be used in shipping company for their fleets' safety management.
Keywords
Collision; Cause of collision; Improper lookout; Non-compliance of traffic rule; Risk management;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Lee, O. Y. (2000), "A Study on Crew Safety Awareness and Measures to Improve Safety Management", p.80, Report of Seminar for the Prevention of Marine Accident, 2000, Marine Accidents Inquiry Agency.
2 Lee, O. Y. (2002), "An Empirical Analysis for the Implementation of Safety Management System under ISM Code". Journal of Korean Navigation and Port Research 26(2), pp.245.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
3 SOLAS Convention, IMO.
4 Swedish Club Letter, "Narrow margins leave for human error", No.2-2005. http://www.swedichcluhcom/upload/18/2005-2.pdf
5 The Nautical Institute(2003), The International Maritime Human Element Bulletin, Issue No.1.
6 The Nautical Institute(2004), The International Maritime Human Element Bulletin, Issue No.2.
7 The Nautical Institute(2004), The International Maritime Human Element Bulletin, Issue No.5.
8 The Nautical Institute(2005), The International Maritime Human Element Bulletin, Issue No.6.
9 UK P&I Club(1997), "Ten-year trend in maritime risk", Analysis of Major Claims. http://www.ukpancli.com/ ukpandi/resource.nsf/Files/ claimsi/$FILE/ claimsi. pdf
10 U.S. Coast Guard(2003), Crew Endurance Management Newsletter, Volume I, Issue 1.
11 U.S. Coast Guard(2005), Crew Endurance Management Newsletter, Volume II, Issue 4.
12 U.S. Coast Guard(2006), Crew Endurance Management Newsletter, Volume III, Issue 1.
13 IMO(1999), Resolution A.890(21), "Principles of Safe Manning", ANNEX 2.
14 Cater, R. L., Johnson, J. E. V., Loader, H. R.(1981), "Risk Management", The CIl Tuition Service, London.
15 Frank, E. B. J. and Robert, G. L. (1976), "Loss Control Management". International Loss Control Institute, p.39
16 Heinrich, H. W., Dan Petersen, P. E. CSP, Nestor Roos, D.B.A (1980), "Industrial Accident Prevention", McGrawHill Book Co., pp.21-22.
17 International Safety Management Code 1994. IMO
18 Japan Marine Accidents Inquiry Agency(2002 - 2004), "Reports on Marine Accidents".
19 Korean Maritime Safety Tribunal(1995-2004), "The statistics of marine accidents".
20 Marine Accident Investigation Branch(2004), "Bridge watchkeeping Safety Study", 1/2004. http://www.maib.gov.uk /cms_resources/Bridge_watchkeeping_safety _study.pdf
21 International Ship and Port Facility Security Code and SOLAS Amendments 2002, IMO