Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2007.31.2.133

An Analysis of the Decision Factors on Mokpo Port by Multinomial Logit Model  

Seong, Yu-Chang (Graduate school of Kobe University)
Youn, Myung-Ou (Division of Maritime Transportation System, Mokpo National Maritime University)
Abstract
Relative importance of maritime transport that takes charge of main current of freight in country' economy is very large. Especially, port and facility carry out important role which treats freight of import and export smoothly and improves international trade as turning point, to achieve key role on connection and association between sea and land. For such reason, enlargement of port facilities or development of port needs to grasp exactly the utilization of port, attributes and selective factors of shipper. On the other hand, the amounts of physical distribution on Mokpo port located in Korean west coast are increasing, with fast economic growth of East Asian including China. This study uses discrete choice model that is measuring to analyze attribute and characteristic of Mokpo port, and analyzes port selection by decision factors of shipper. This paper composed a questionnaire using the result of preceding research, to decide port selection factor among competitive ports. Through factor analysis on a basis of the questionnaire' result, five principal components were extracted. These are resorted out by Logit model, to grasp competitive elements of port. This research fin present direction which raises competitive power of ports in west coast of Korea, especially on alternative and concentration of middle-class port as Mokpo may be useful.
Keywords
Port selection; Factor analysis; Mokpo port; Multinomial logit model;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ben- Akiva, M., and Lerman, S. R. (1985), Discrete Choice Analysis-Theory and Application to Travel Demand. The MIT Press, Cambridge/Massachusetts
2 Heckman, J. J. (1981), Statistical Models for Discrete Panel Data. In Structural Analysis for Discrete Data: With Econometric Applications. C.F. Manski and D. McFadden (eds). The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass
3 Song, D. W. and Yeo, K. T. (2004), 'A Competitive Analysis of Chinese Container Port using the Analytic Hierarchy Process', Maritime Economic & Logistics, Vol 6 No 1, pp.34-52   DOI
4 UNCTAD (1992), Port Marketing and the Challenge of the Third Generation
5 Ben-Akiva, M., McFadden, D., Grling, T, Gopinath, D., Walker, J., Bolduc, D., Brsch-Supan, A, Delqui, P., Larichev, O., Morikawa, T, Polydoropoulou, A, and Rao, V. (1999), 'Extended Framework for Modeling Choice Behavior', Marketing Letters Vol 10 No 3, pp.187-203   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Johnson, L. W. and Hensher, D. A (1982), 'Application of Multinomial Probit to a Two-period Panel Data Set'. Transportation Research, Series A, Vol 16, No 5/6, pp.457-464   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Train, K. E. (2003), Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge Univ. Press
8 Willlgale M. C. (1982), 'The Port-Routing Behaviour of Short-Sea Ship Operator; Theory and Practice', Maritime Policy and Management, Vol. 8 No.2, pp.109-120   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Kim, T. W., Kim, Y. S, Kwak, K. S., and Nam, K. C. (2006), 'Analysis on the Relation between Port Competition Players and Port Selection Factors', Journal of Korean Navigation and Port Research, Vol 30, No 3, pp. 219-226   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Korea Maritime Institute (2005), Shipping Statistics Handbook 2005
11 Youn, M O. and Keum, J. S. (2003), Port Management, Haein Publication
12 Kim, Y. S., Lee, H. G., and Shin, C. H (2004), 'An Emprical Study on Port Selection Criteria', Journal of Navigation and Port Research, Vol 28, No 6, pp.525-530   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Chang, Y T, Lee, S. Y, and Lee, S. G. (2002), 'Factors Affecting Liner' Port Selection by Trade Route', KMI
14 Murpy, P. R, Daley, J. M, and Dalenberg, D. R (1992), 'Port Selection Criteria; An Application of a Transportation Tesearch Framework', Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol 28 No 3, pp.237-255
15 Slack, B,(1985), 'Containerization, Inter-Port Competition and Port Selection', Maritime Policy and Management, Vol 12 No 4, pp.293- 303   DOI