Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2003.27.2.199

A Study of Survivability Improvement Method for Naval Ships′Design I - Design Method Considering Box Girder -  

Kim, Jae-Hyun (Hyundai Heavy Industry/ National Korea Maritime University Graduate School)
Park, Myeong-Gyu (Division of Maritime Systems Engineering, National Korea Maritime University)
Publication Information
Journal of Navigation and Port Research / v.27, no.2, 2003 , pp. 199-207 More about this Journal
Abstract
In the combat environments at the sea, the naval ships should have enough structural integrity to perform the task under the enemy's attack and possible damages. Although the naval ships can be damaged from the enemy's attack, those damages should be minimized and the naval ships must maintain their combat capabilities continuously after recoveries from the damages. Therefore, it is ve교 important for modem naval ships, especially combat naval ships, to ensure the survivability. This paper reviewed the developing procedure for the technique of the naval ships structures and described method, especially box girder system considering survivability. The efficiency of box girder is examined by numerical simulation, and it is found that the establishment of box girder is a good design method to improve the survivability.
Keywords
combat naval ships; survivability; susceptibility; vulnerability; box girder; blast hardened bulkhead;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Sims, P.(1983); Trends in Surface Warship Design 1861-1983, Naval Engineers Journal, pp. 33-49
2 정정훈, 허영철, 김병현(1997); 수중폭발 휘핑 응답해석을 통한 선체 거어더 종강도 평가, 대한조선학회, 1997년 춘계 학술대회 논문집
3 Aoki, E.(1976); A Short History of Warship's Protection, Ship of the World(Japan), pp. 55-64
4 BV 043, Germany(1985); Building Specifications for Ships of the Federal Armed Forces - shock Resistance Experimental and Mathematical Proof
5 Hallquist, J. O.(1999); LS-DYNA Theoretical Manual, Livermore Software Technology Co.
6 Lloyd' s Register(l999); Provision Rules for the Classifications of Naval Ships
7 MIL-S-901D, U.S.Navy(1989); Shock Tests, High-Impact Shipboard Machinery, Equipment, and Systems
8 TM5-1300/NAVFAC P-397/AFR 88-22, Washington, DC, Joint Departments of the Army, the Navy and the Air Force(1990); Structures to Resist the effects of Accidental Explosion
9 Pusey, H., C.(1984); Reflections on Trends in Dynamics the Navy's Perspective, Shock and Vibration Bulletin, vol. 54, pp. 59-64
10 Saicl, M. O.(1995); Theory and Practice of Total Ship Survivability for Ship Design, Naval Engineers Journal, pp. 191-203
11 Sielski, R., A.(1987); The history of Aluminium as a Deckhouse Material, Naval Engineers Journal, pp. 165-172