Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2003.27.2.129

A Comparative Study on the Investigation and Inquiry System of Marine Accidents  

Jong, Jae-Yong (Faculty of Ocean Science, Cheju National University)
Na, Song-Jin (Graduate School of Korea Maritime University)
Publication Information
Journal of Navigation and Port Research / v.27, no.2, 2003 , pp. 129-135 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study describes and discusses the marine accidents investigation & inquiry system of Korea, U.K., U.S.A., the Netherlands and Japan. As the results of the comparison of them, the following recommendations are made with respect to improve the system in Korea. (1) The Agency should be independent from the central Government with respect to the budged, personnel management and a agency building. (2) The inspection function and judgment function should be divided into separate Agency. (3) The Agency should has a recommendation right to Government agency according to the results of investigation. (4) The composition of inspectors & judges must be diversified including navigation, marine engineering and naval architecture background. (5) The Agency should have co-operative system with the Marine Police Agency. (6) International affairs division should be included in the Agency to promote international relations.
Keywords
MAIB; MCA; NTSB; DTSB; MAIA;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 金仁顯(2001), 船員의 法的 責任과 保護, 부산, 효성출판사, pp.105-106
2 金址洙(1997), '海難審判組織에 관한 硏究', pp.137-139
3 목포해양대학교(2002), 해양안전심판과실비율 적용사례 조사연구, pp.1-4
4 朴慶鉉(1997), '우리나라 海難審判法의 問題點과 改正方向에 관한 硏究. 韓國海洋大學校 博土學位論文, pp.361-370
5 沈根亨(2000), 海洋安全審判法 硏究, 서울, 고산사. pp.173-180
6 중앙해양안전심판원(2002), 해양안전심판제도 중장기 발전전략. pp.30-38
7 海洋安全審判院(1999), 海洋安全審判法規集 pp.5-34
8 海難審判協會(2002), 海難調査의 國際協力化에 관한 硏究報告書. pp.183-190
9 海難審判協會(1999), 海難審判法 及び 關係法令. pp.1-10
10 日本海難審判協會(1997), 海難審判制度百年史, pp.173-180
11 日本 海難審判廳(2002), 海難レボ―ト2002, pp.20-29