Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.21796/jse.2018.42.3.352

The Influence of the Application of Peer Instruction in Science Class on Participation Degree and the Debating Ability of Third-Grade Elementary School Students  

Kim, KyuHwan (Busan Borim Elementary School)
Publication Information
Journal of Science Education / v.42, no.3, 2018 , pp. 352-370 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore how Peer Instruction can continuously help improve third-grade students' participation and their ability to debate in Science classes. There were multiple-choice questions relating to the discussions and debating class and Peer Instruction of the entire third grade Science curriculum which had been applied for six months. Also, after looking into the class participation and the debating ability, there was a degree of increase. As a result, there were five areas in class participation which are class preparation, class activity, expressing oneself, class expansion, and class dedication; all have statistically significant effects on the six areas of the discussion skill: logic, analytical skill, listening skill, receptiveness, regularity, and initiative. As it shows, both of these areas show a significant statistical effect on the application of Peer Instruction and confirmed to have a positive influence on the change in the participation and the discussion skills.
Keywords
peer instrucion; participation degree; discussion ability; debating ability;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Cha, J. W. (2016). A study on the activation for curriculum based reading debate: Focusing on middle school in Ui-wang city (Master's thesis). Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.
2 Cha, M. J., Kim, C. M., Kwon, H. J., Cho, H. D., Lee, J. Y., Jeong, S. J., Park, E., Moon, Y., Wang, M., Seo, J., Jee, J. M., Zhang, W., Park, M. S., Lee, Y., Kim, K. D., Lee, R., Park, H., Yu, S. J. Kim, J., & Park, I. (2010). A development of learner participation scale in instruction. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 22(1), 195-219.
3 Chung, Y. L., & Son, D. H. (2000). Effects of cooperative learning strategy on achievement and science learning attitudes in middle school biology. Journal of the Korean Association for in Science Education, 20(4), 611-623.
4 Crouch, C. H. (1998). Peer instruction: An interactive approach for large lecture classes. Optics & Photonics News, 9(9), 37-41.   DOI
5 Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 69(9), 970-977.   DOI
6 Jung, S., & Bae, S. A. (2014). The practice and perception of elementary and middle school students' discussion ability, and constraints and satisfaction of discussion class. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 26(1), 41-64.
7 Kang, S. J., Han, S. J., & Noh, T. H. (2002). The effect of cooperative small group discussion in science concept learning. Journal of the Korean Association for in Science Education, 22(1), 93-101.
8 Kang, S. J., Kim, Y. H., & Noh, T. H. (2004). The influence of small group discussion using the history of science upon students' understanding about the nature of science. Journal of the Korean Association for in Science Education, 24(5), 996-1007.
9 Kang, T. W., & Jang, H. S. (2003). Construction and validation of debate competence. Korean Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunication Studies, 17(4). 139-185.
10 Kim, K. H. (2008). Effects of peer instruction by learning contents in elementary science classes (Doctoral dissertation). Korea National University of Education, Chung-Buk, Korea.
11 Kim, Y. G., & Jeong, G. S. (2010). The effects of small-group discussion lesson using concept sketches in astronomy of earth science. Journal of the Korean Association for in Science Education, 30(1), 170-180.   DOI
12 Lee, M. (2013). A study on the curriculum of educational drama through forum theatre (Master's thesis). Sejong University, Seoul, Korea.
13 Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user's manual. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14 Moon, B. (2006). The effects of small group discussion lesson on science process skills and learning attitude (Master's thesis). Korea National University of Education, Chung-Buk, Korea.
15 Park, J. H. (2010). An analysis of learner activities in debate education (Master's thesis). Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
16 Turpen, C., & Finkelstein, N. (2009). Not all interactive engagement is the same: Variations in physics professors' implementation of peer instruction. Physical Review Special Topic Physics Education Research, 5(2), 020101-1-18.   DOI
17 Turpen, C., Dancy, M., & Henderson, C. (2010). Faculty perspectives on using peer instruction: A national study. Paper presented at Physics Education Research Conference 2010, July 21-22, Portland, Oregon.