Browse > Article

Clinical Significance of Methacholine Bronchial Challenge Test in Differentiating Asthma From COPD  

Hong, Yun Kyung (Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School)
Chung, Chi Ryang (Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School)
Paeck, Kyung Hyun (Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School)
Kim, So Ri (Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School)
Min, Kyung Hoon (Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School)
Park, Seoung Ju (Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School)
Lee, Heung Bum (Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School)
Lee, Yong Chul (Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School)
Rhee, Yang Keun (Department of Internal Medicine, Chonbuk National University Medical School)
Publication Information
Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases / v.61, no.5, 2006 , pp. 433-439 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: Although airway hyper-responsiveness is one of the characteristics of asthma. bronchial hyper-responsiveness has also been observed to some degree in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Moreover, several reports have demonstrated that a number of patients have both COPD and asthma. The methacholine bronchial challenge test (MCT) is a widely used method for the detecting and quantifying the airway hyper- responsiveness, and is one of the diagnostic tools in asthma. However, the significance of MCT in differentiating asthma or COPD combined with asthma from pure COPD has not been defined. The aim of this study was to determine the role of MCT in differentiating asthma from pure COPD. Method: This study was performed prospectively and was composed of one hundred eleven patients who had undergone MCT at Chonbuk National University Hospital. Sixty-five asthma patients and 23 COPD patients were enrolled and their MCT data were analyzed and compared with the results of a control group. Result: The positive rates of MCT were 65%, 30%, and 9% in the asthma, COPD, and control groups, respectively. The mean $PC_{20}$ values of the asthma, COPD, and control groups were $8.1{\pm}1.16mg/mL$, $16.9{\pm}2.21mg/mL$, and $22.0{\pm}1.47mg/mL$, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of MCT for diagnosing asthma were 65%, 84%, 81%, and 69%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of MCT (ed note: please check this as I believe that these values correspond to the one $PC_{20}$ value. Please check my changes.) at the new cut-off points of$PC_{20}{\leq}16mg/ml$, were 80%, 75%, 78%, and 78%, respectively. Conclusion: MCT using the new cut-off point can be used as a more precise and useful diagnostic tool for distinguishing asthma from pure COPD.
Keywords
Bronchial challenge test; COPD; Asthma;
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By SCOPUS : 0
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 National Collaborating Centre for Chronic Conditions. National clinical guideline on management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in adult in primary and secondary care. Thorax 2004;59(Suppl):1-232
2 Burney PG, Britton JR, Chinn S, Tattersfield AE, Papacosta AO, Kelson MC, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of bronchial reactivity in an adult population: results from a community study. Thorax 1987;42: 38-44   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Taylor RG, Joyce H, Holland F, Pride NB. Bronhcial reactivity to inhaled histamine and annual rate of decline in FEV1 in male smokers and ex-smoker. Thorax 1985;40:9-16   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Sciurba FC. Physiologic similarities and differences between COPD and asthma. Chest 2004;126(2 Suppl): 117S-124S   DOI
5 Oh SH, Hong CS, Lee HC, Huh KB, Lee WY, Lee SY. Evaluation of clinical significance of methacholine challenge test in asthma, allergic rhinitis, and chest symptom patients. Korean J Med1985;29:599-605
6 Fish JE. Bronchial provocation testing. In: Middleton E, editor. Allergy: principles and practice. 4th ed. St.Louis:Mosby-Year Book 1993
7 Yan K, Salome CM, Woolcock AJ. Prevalence and nature of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am Rev Respir Dis 1985;132:25-9
8 Woolcock AJ, Peat JK, Salome CM, Yan K, Anderson SD, Schoeffel RE, et al. Prevalence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness and asthma in a rural adult populacation Thorax 198742:361-8   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Rhee YG, In BH, Lee YD, Lee YC, Lee HB. Prevalence of combined bronchial asthma with COPD in patients with moderate to severe air flow limitation. Tuberc Respir Dis 2003;54:386-94   DOI
10 Fabbri LM, Romagnoli M, Caorbetta L, Casoni G, Busljetic K, Turato G, et al. Differences in airway inflammation in patients with fixed airflow obstruction due to asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;167:418-24   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Trigg CJ, Manolitsas ND, Wang J, Calderon MA, McAuley A, Jordan SE, et al. Placebo-controlled immunopathologic study of four months of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;150:17-22   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Sparrow D, O'Connor G, Colton T, Barry CL, Weiss ST. The relationship of nonspecific bronchial responsiveness to the occurrence of respiratory symptoms and decreased levels of pulmonary function: the Normative Aging Study. Am Rev Respir Dis 1987;135:1255-60   DOI
13 Rijcken B, Schouten JP, Weiss ST, Rosner B, de Vries K, van der Lende R. Long term-variability of bronchial responsiveness to histamine in a random population sample of adults. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993148: 944.9   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Tashkin DP, Altos MD, Bleecker ER, Connett JE, Kanner RE, Lee WW, et al. The lung health study: airway responsiveness to inhaledmethacholin in smokers with mild to moderate airflow limitation. Am Rev Respir Dis 1992;145:301-10   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Perpina M, pellicer C, de Diego A, Compte L, Macian V. Diagnostic value of the bronchial provocation test with methacholine in asthma: a Bayesian analysis approach. Chest 1993104:149-54   DOI
16 Bahous J, Cartier A, Ouimet G, Pineau L, Malo JL. Nonallergic bronchial hyperexcitability in chronic bronchitis. Am Rev REspir Dis 1984;129:216-20
17 Mannino DM, Gagnon RC, Petty TL, Lydick E. Obstructive lung disease and low lung function in adults in the United States: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988. 1994. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:1683.9   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Grootendorst DC, Rabe KF. Mecahnisms of bronchial hyperreactivity in asthmaand chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2004;1:77-87
19 Verma VK, Cockcroft DW, Dosman JA. Airway responsiveness to inhaled histamine in chronic obstructive airway disease: chronic bronchitis versus emphysema. Chest 1988;94:457-61   DOI
20 Ernst P, Ghezzo H, Becklake MR. Risk factors for bronchial hyperresponsiveness in late childhood and early adolescence. Eur Respir J 2002;20:635-9   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Britton J, Pavord I, Richards K, Knox A, Wisniewski A, Wahedna I, et al. Factors influencing the occurrence of airway hyperreactivity in the general population: the importance of atopy and airway caliber. Eur Respir J 1994;7:881-7
22 Crapo RO, Casaburi R, Coates AL, Enright PL, Hankinson JL, Irvin CG, et al. Guidelines for methacholine and exercise challenge testing-1999: this official statement of the American thoracic society was adopted by the ATS board of directors, July 1999. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:309-29   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Ramsdell JW, Nachtwey FJ, Moser KM. Bronchial hyperreactivity in chronic obstructive bronchitis. Am Rev Respir Dis 1982;126:829-32