Browse > Article

Characteristic of Citizen Participatory Transdisciplinary Research: A Critical Literature Review  

Lim, Hong-Tak (부경대학교 과학기술정책협동과정)
Song, Wichin (과학기술정책연구원)
Publication Information
Journal of Science and Technology Studies / v.19, no.1, 2019 , pp. 137-179 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper aims to uncover and discuss characteristics of citizen participatory transdisciplinary research which has been gaining momentum in recent years in the form of social-problem solving R&D program and sustainability science research. Two key questions are examined. One is related to the mechanism of cooperation in knowledge production among participants, namely scientists and citizens(extra-academics), while the other is examining whether the output of participatory research activity is more than journals or patents. Diverse strands of literature on knowledge and knowledge production including Mode 2, Learning modes and the notion of co-production of knowledge and social order are drawn and critically reviewed to elucidate the characteristics of citizen participatory transdisciplinary research.
Keywords
Citizen Participation; Transdisciplinary Research; Living Lab; Co-production;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 성지은 (2018), 연구개발-사회-대학의 혁신모델로서 리빙랩활동의 현황과 과제, 동명대 리빙랩 포럼, 2018.10.25.
2 성지은.송위진.박인용 (2014), 사용자 주도형 혁신모델로서 리빙랩 사례 분석과 적용 가능성 탐색, 기술혁신학회지, 17권 2호, 309-333쪽.
3 성지은.한규영.정서화 (2016), 지역문제해결을 위한 국내리빙랩 사례 분석, 과학기술학연구, 16권 2호, 65-98쪽.
4 송위진 (2015), 사회문제 해결형 혁신정책과 혁신정책의 재해석, 과학기술학연구, 15권 2호, 135-162쪽.
5 송위진 엮음 (2017), 사회.기술시스템 전환: 이론과 실천, 한울아카데미.
6 임홍탁 (2014), 국민의 창의성과 사용자/현장중심 혁신, 기술혁신연구 22권 3호. 135-166쪽.   DOI
7 주은경 (2017), 지자체와 사회혁신 "독산4동 2023 독산행복마을", 제 3회 한국리빙랩네트워크 세미나 발표자료, 2017. 7. 12.
8 한국과학기술기획평가원 (2018), 제2차 과학기술 기반 국민생활(사회) 문제해결 종합계획(2018-2022) 주요내용, KISTEP InI, 26권 가을호, 38-47쪽.
9 한국에너지기술평가원 (2017), '16년 에너지기술 수용성 제고 및 사업화 촉진사업 1차 성과공유 워크숍, 발표자료, 전략컨설팅집현, 2017. 4.
10 Benham, C. & K.A. Daniell. (2016), "Putting transdisciplinary research into practice: A participatory approach to understanding change in coastal social-ecological systems", Ocean & Coastal Management, Vol. 128, pp. 29-39.   DOI
11 Brandt, P., Ernst, A, Gralla, F., Luederitz, G., Lang, D. J., Newig, J., Reinert, F., Abson, D. J. & H. von Wehrden. (2013), "A review of transdisciplinary research in sustainability science", Ecological Economics, Vol. 92. pp. 1-15.   DOI
12 Brister, E., (2016), "Disciplinary capture and epistemological obstacles to interdisciplinary research: Lessons from central African conservation disputes", Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Vol. 56. pp. 82-91.   DOI
13 Bunders, J. & Leydesdorff, L. (1987), "The Causes and Consequences of Collaborations between Scientists and Non-scientific Groups", in Blume, S., Bunders, J., Leydesdorff, L. and Whitley, R. ed., The Social Direction of the Public Sciences. pp. 331-348, D. Reidel Publishing Company.
14 Bush, V. (1945), Science - The Endless Frontier: A report to the President on a Program for Postwar Scientific Research, National Science Foundation reprint in 1960.
15 Collins, H. M. & Evans, R. (2002), "The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience", Social Studies of Science, Vol. 32, pp. 235-296.   DOI
16 Darbellay, F. (2015), "Rethinking inter-and transdisciplinarity: Undisciplined knowledge and the emergence of new thought style", Futures, Vol. 65, pp. 163-174.   DOI
17 de Jong, S.P.L., T. Wardenaar & E. Horlings. (2016), "Exploring the promises of transdisciplinary research: A quantitative study of two climate research programmes", Research Policy, Vol. 45(7), pp. 1397-1406.   DOI
18 Efstathiou, S. (2016), "Is it possible to give scientific solutions to Grand Challenges? On the idea of grand challenges for life science research", Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Vol. 56, pp. 48-61.   DOI
19 Felt, U., J. Igelsbock, A. Schikowitz & T. Volker. (2016), "Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research in Practice: Between Imagainaries of Collective Experimentation and Entrenched Academic Value Order", Science, Technology & Human Value, Vol. 4(4), pp. 732-761.
20 Geels, F. W. (2004), "From sectoral system of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory", Research Policy, Vol. 33, pp. 897-920.   DOI
21 Gibbons, M., Nowonty, H., Limoges, C., Trow, M., Schwartzman, S. & Scott, P. (1994), The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, London: Sage.
22 Gibbons, M. (1999), "Scienceʼs new social contract with society", Nature, Vol. 402, C81-C84   DOI
23 Guston, D. H. (2000), Between Politics and Science, Cambridge University Press: New York & Cambridge.
24 Hess, D. J. (2005), "Technology- and Product-oriented Movements: Approximating Social Movements Studies and Science and Technology Studies", Science, Technology and Human Values, Vol. 30, pp. 515-535.   DOI
25 Jasanoff (2004), "The idiom of co-production", in Jasanoff, S. ed. pp. 1-12, States of Knowledge. Routledge: London & New York.
26 Jensen, M.B., B. Johnson, E. Lorenz, & Lundvall B.A. (2007), "Forms of Knowledge and modes of innovation", Research Policy, Vol. 36, pp. 680-693.   DOI
27 Lenhard, J., Lucking, H. & Schwechheimer, H. (2006), "Expert Knowledge, Mode-2 and Scientific disciplines: Two contrasting views", Science and Public Policy, Vol. 33(5), pp. 341-350.   DOI
28 Maasen, S. & Lieven, O. (2006), "Transdisciplinarity: a new mode of governing science?", Science and Public Policy, Vol. 33(6), pp. 399-410.   DOI
29 Mangenatin, V. & Callon, M. (1995), "Technological competition, strategies of the firms and the choice of the first users: the case of road guidance technologies", Research Policy, Vol. 24, pp. 441-458.   DOI
30 Mitchell, C., D. Cordell & D. Fam. (2015), "Beginning at the end: The outcome spaces framework to guide purposive transdisciplinary research", Futures, Vol. 65, pp. 86-96.   DOI
31 Molina, A. H. (1994), "Understanding the emergence of a large-scale European initiative in technology", Science and Public Policy, Vol. 21, pp. 31-41.
32 Nowonty, H., P. Scott & M. Gibbons (2001), Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty, Polity Press.
33 Ostrom, E., (1990), Governing the commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press.
34 Parks, R.B., Baker, P.C., Kiser, L., Oakerson, R., Ostrom, E., Ostrom, V., Percy, S., Vandivort, M., Whitaker, G., & Wilson, R., (1981), "Consumers as coproducers of public services: some economic and institutional considerations", Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 9(7), pp. 1001-1011.   DOI
35 Pinch, T. & Bijkeer, W. (1987), "The social construction of Facts and Artifacts: or How the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other," in Bijker, W., Hughes, T. & Pinch, T. ed. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. pp. 17-50, Cambridge, MIT Press.
36 Polanyi, M. (1967), The Tacit Dimension, Anchor Books.
37 Rosendahl, J., M.A. Zanella, S. Rist & J. Weigelt. (2015), "Scientistsʼsituated knowledge: Strong objectivity in transdisciplinarity", Futures, Vol. 65, pp. 17-27.   DOI
38 Schot, J. & E. Steinmueller. (2018), "Three Frames for Innovation Policy: R&D, Systems of Innovation and Transformative Change", Research Policy, Vol. 47, pp. 1554-1567.   DOI
39 Thoren, H. & L. Breian. (2016), "Stepping Stone or stumbling block? Mode 2 knowledge production in sustainability science", Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Vol. 56, pp. 71-81.   DOI
40 Shinn, T. (2002), "The Triple Helix and New Production of Knowledge: Prepackaged Thinking on Science and Technology", Social Studies of Science, Vol.32, pp. 599-614.   DOI
41 Vargo, S. L. & R. F. Lusch. (2004), "Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 68, pp. 1-17.   DOI
42 변순천 외 (2015), 사회문제해결형 기술개발사업: 2015년도 사업계획 적정성 재검토 보고서, 한국과학기술기획평가원.