Browse > Article

When Robots Meet the Elderly: The Contexts of Interaction and the Role of Mediators  

Shin, Heesun (카이스트 과학기술정책대학원)
Jeon, Chihyung (카이스트 과학기술정책대학원)
Publication Information
Journal of Science and Technology Studies / v.18, no.2, 2018 , pp. 135-179 More about this Journal
Abstract
How do robots interact with the elderly? In this paper, we analyze the contexts of interaction between robots and the elderly and the role of mediators in initiating, facilitating, and maintaining the interaction. We do not attempt to evaluate the robot's performance or measure the impact of robots on the elderly. Instead, we focus on the circumstances and contexts within which a robot is situated as it interacts with the elderly. Our premise is that the success of human-robot interaction does not depend solely on the robot's technical capability, but also on the pre-arranged settings and local contingencies at the site of interaction. We select three television shows that feature robots for the elderly and one "dementia-prevention" robot in a regional healthcare center as our sites for observing robot-elderly interaction: "Grandma's Robot"(tvN), "Co-existence Experiment''(JTBC), "Future Diary"(MBC), and the Silbot class in Suwon. By analyzing verbal and non-verbal interactions between the elderly and the robots in these programs, we point out that in most cases the robots and the elderly do not meet one-to-one; the interaction is usually mediated by an actor who is not an old person. These mediators are not temporary or secondary components in the robot-elderly interaction; they play a key role in the relationship by arranging the first meeting, triggering initial interactions, and carefully observing unfolding interactions. At critical moments, the mediators prevent the interaction from falling apart by intervening verbally or physically. Based on our observation of the robot-elderly interaction, we argue that we can better understand and evaluate the human-robot interaction in general by paying attention to the existence and role of the mediators. We suggest that researchers in human-robot interaction should expand their analytical focus from one-to-one interactions between humans and robots to human-robot-human interactions in diverse real-world situations.
Keywords
Robot; Elderly; Interaction; Mediator;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김숙. 박주연 (2014), 텔레비전 시사 및 교양 프로그램에 나타난 노인 이미지 연구, 사회과학연구, 제30권 제2호, 281-300쪽.
2 김은준 (2017), 미디어가 표방하는 고령화 사회의 바람직한 노인상 - 환영받는 시민으로 노년을 보낼 사명, 한국언론학보, 제61권 제3호, 157-188쪽.
3 민경배 (2016), SF영화와 로봇 사회학, 커뮤니케이션북스.
4 박주연. 김숙 (2013), 텔레비전 드라마에 나타난 노인의 가족 내 역할과 지위에 관한 연구, 한국언론학보, 제57권 제2호, 185-206쪽.
5 송정희 (2009), 치매노인에 대한 동물로봇 매개 중재 프로그램의 효과, 대한간호학회지, 제39권 제4호, 562-573쪽.   DOI
6 양선희 (2015), 리얼 버라이어티 쇼의 진화 - <꽃보다 할배>로 본 시니어 예능의 가능성과 한계, 한국방송학보, 제29권 제4호, 322-356쪽.
7 오진환. 이여진. 신철진. 박천수. 강상승. 김재홍. 김인숙 (2015), 실버케어로봇 프로그램이 시설노인의 인지기능, 우울, 일상생활 수행능력에 미치는 효과, 대한간호학회지, 제45권 제3호, 388-396쪽.   DOI
8 임난영. 강현숙. 박영숙. 안동현. 오진환. 송정희 (2009), 동물로봇과의 상호작용에 따른 치매노인의 인지기능, 기분상태, 문제행동 및 반응의 변화, 기본간호학회지, 제16권 제2호, 223-231쪽.
9 구본권 (2015), 로봇 시대, 인간의 일, 어크로스.
10 김선영 (2009), 텔레비전 광고의 한일 노인 정체성 비교, 한국사회학, 제43집 제 5호, 133-169쪽.
11 장용호. 노동렬 (2010), 리얼리티 예능 프로그램의 자기조직화에 관한 연구: <1박2일>과 <무한도전>의 창의적 생산방식을 중심으로, 방송과 커뮤니케이션, 제11권 제2호, 39-90쪽.
12 전치형 (2016), 모험하는 로봇, 방황하는 인간, 인문예술잡지 F, 제 21호, 44-57쪽.
13 한스 모라벡, 박우석 번역 (2011), 마음의 아이들: 로봇과 인공지능의 미래, 김영사. [Moravec, H. (1988), Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence, Harvard University Press]
14 Alac, M. (2009), "Moving Android: On Social Robots and Body-in-Interaction", Social Studies of Science, Vol. 39(4), pp. 491-528.   DOI
15 Alac, M., Movellan, J., and Tanaka, F. (2011), "When a Robot is Social: Spatial Arrangements and Multimodal Semiotic Engagement in the Practice of Social Robotics", Social Studies of Science, Vol. 41(6), pp. 893-926.   DOI
16 Borg, K. L. (2010), Auto Mechanics: Technology and Expertise in Twentieth-Century America, Johns Hopkins University Press.
17 Calo, C. J., Hunt-Bull, N., Lewis, L., and Metzler, T. (2011), "Ethical Implications of Using the Paro Robot with a Focus on Dementia Patient Care", 2011 AAAI Workshop, pp. 20-24.
18 Campbell, A. (2011), "Dementia Care: Could Animal Robots Benefit Residents?", Nursing & Residential Care, Vol. 13(12), pp. 602-604.   DOI
19 Fasola, J. and Mataric, M. (2013), "A Socially Assistive Robot Exercise Coach for the Elderly", Journal of Human-Robot Interaction, Vol. 2(2), pp. 3-32.
20 Guevarra, A. R. (2015), "Techno-Modeling Care: Racial Branding, Dis/embodied Labor, and ʻCybracerosʼ in South Korea", Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, Vol. 36(3), pp. 139-159.   DOI
21 Heerink, M., Krose, B., Evers, V., and Wielinga, B. (2006), "The Influence of a Robot's Social Abilities on Acceptance by Elderly Users", Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, pp. 521-526.
22 Iwamura, Y., Shiomi, M., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., and Hagita, N. (2011), " Do Elderly People Prefer a Conversational Humanoid as a Shopping Assistant Partner in Supermarkets?", Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 449-457.
23 Russell, A. L. and Vinsel, L. (2018), "After Innovation, Turn to Maintenance", Technology and Culture, Vol. 59(1), pp. 1-25.   DOI
24 Kim, G. H., Jeon, S., Im, K., Kwon, H., Lee, B. H., Kim, G. Y., Jeong, H., Han, N. E., Seo, S. W., Cho, H., Noh, Y., Park, S. E., Kim, H., Hwang, J. W., Yoon, C. W., Kim, H. J., Ye, B. S., Chin, J. H., Kim, J., Suh, M. K., Lee, J. M., Kim, S. T., Choi, M., Kim, M. S., Heilman, K. M., Jeong, J. H., and Na, D. L. (2015), "Structural Brain Changes after Traditional and Robot-Assisted Multi-Domain Cognitive Training in Community dwelling Healthy Elderly", PLOS ONE, Vol. 10(4)
25 Mordoch, E., Osterreicher, A., Guse, L., Roger, K., and Thompson, G. (2013), "Use of Social Commitment Robots in the Care of Elderly People with Dementia: A Literature Review", Maturitas, Vol. 74(1), pp. 14-20.   DOI
26 Orr, J. E. (1996), Talking About Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job, Cornell University Press.
27 Sabanovic, S. (2010), "Robots in Society, Society in Robots: Mutual Sahping of Society and Technology as a Framework for Social Robot Design", International Journal of Social Robotics, Vol. 2(4), pp. 439-450.   DOI
28 Sabelli, A. M., Kanda, T., and Hagita, N. (2011), "A Conversational Robot in an Elderly Care Center: An Ethnographic Study", Proceedings of the 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 37-44.
29 Sharkey, A. and Sharkey, N. (2012), "Granny and the Robots: Ethical Issues in Robot Care for the Elderly", Ethics and Information Technology, Vol. 14(1), pp. 27-40.   DOI
30 Shibata, T. and Wada, K. (2011), "Robot Therapy: A New Approach for Mental Healthcare of the Elderly-A Mini-Review", Gerontology, Vol. 57(4), pp. 378-386.   DOI
31 Van Oost, E. and Reed, D. (2011), "Towards a Sociological Understanding of Robots as Companions", Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Human-Robot Personal Relationship, Vol. 59, pp. 11-18.
32 Sparrow, R. (2002), "The March of the Robot Dogs", Ethics and Information Technology, Vol. 4, pp. 305-318.   DOI
33 Tamura, T., Yonemitsu, S., Itoh, A., Oikawa, D., Kawakami, A., Higashi, Y., Fujimooto, T., and Nakajima, K. (2004), "Is an Entertainment Robot Useful in the Care of Elderly People with Severe Dementia?", The Journal of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, Vol. 59(1), pp. 83-85.   DOI
34 Tapus, A., Tapus, C., and Mataric, M. J. (2009), "The Use of Socially Assistive Robots in the Design of Intelligent Cognitive Therapies for People with Dementia", Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, pp. 924-929.
35 Turkle, S. (2007), "Authenticity in the Age of Digital Companions", Interaction Studies, Vol. 8(3), pp. 501-517.   DOI
36 Tzafestas, S. G. (2015), Roboethics: A Navigating Overview, Springer.
37 Wada, K., Shibata, T., Saito, T., and Tanie, K. (2002), "Analysis of Factors that Bring Mental Effects to Elderly People in Robot Assisted Activity", Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1152-1157.
38 Wada, K. and Shibata, T. (2007), "Living with Seal Robots - Its Sociopsychological and Physiological Influences on the Elderly at a Care House", IEEE Transactions on Robotics, Vol. 23(5), pp. 972-980.   DOI
39 Wright, J. (2018), "Tactile Care, Mechanical Hugs: Japanese Caregivers and Robotic Lifting Devices", Asian Anthropology, Vol. 17(1), pp. 24-39.   DOI
40 고인순 (2017), 파로(PARO)로봇 중재가 치매노인의 인지기능, 정서, 사회적 상호작용 및 문제행동에 미치는 효과, 중앙대학교대학원 박사학위논문.
41 Wu, Y. H., Fassert, C., and Rigaud, A. S. (2012), "Designing Robots for the Elderly: Appearance Issue and Beyond", Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Vol. 54(1), pp. 121-126.   DOI