Browse > Article

Artificial, All Too Natural: Synthetic Biology and Transhumanism in the Post-Genomic Era  

Woo, Taemin (KAIST 과학기술정책대학원)
Park, Buhm Soon (KAIST 과학기술정책대학원)
Publication Information
Journal of Science and Technology Studies / v.16, no.2, 2016 , pp. 33-63 More about this Journal
Abstract
This paper compares and contrasts the concept of nature and the theory of evolution held by leading synthetic biologists and transhumanists in the post-genomic era. Synthetic biology, which emerged in the early 2000s, aims to design biological systems that perform specific functions with the two key concepts of "rational design" and "directed evolution". However, synthetic biology has also raised serious concerns about the creation of man-made biological materials and the manipulation of the direction and speed of evolution. It is no wonder that transhumanists, who dream of creating new, enhanced human species, have welcomed the arrival of synthetic biology. How, then, can we deal with the nature reinvented by synthetic biology? By what means can one justify research that may affect the process of evolution? What intellectual resources do synthetic biology and transhumanism share in common? What influence would the new trend of commercialization of science and technology exert upon the development of synthetic biology? Addressing those questions, this paper argues that the moral authority of nature can be restored in this post-genomic era.
Keywords
synthetic biology; transhumanism; rational design; directedevolution; human enhancement; evolutionary optimality; moral authority of nature;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김하성 (2015), 합성생물학의 최신 연구동향, BioInpro 14.
2 김혜진 (2016), '기업가'와 '순수과학자' 사이에서: 수사를 통해 본 크레이그 벤터의 경계 작업, 서울대학교 석사학위논문.
3 김호연 (2012), 새로운 유전학(New Genetics), 과거 우생학 (Eugenics)의 재현인가?, 인문과학연구 32, 193-218쪽.
4 Venter, J. C. (2013), Life at the Speed of Light: From the Double Helix to the Dawn of Digital Life (New York: Penguin Books).
5 h+Media (2013. 12. 31), ʻBook Review: Life at the Speed of Light by J. Craig Venterʼ.
6 Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethics Issues (2010), New Directions: The Ethics of Synthetic Biology and Emerging Technologies, Washington D.C.
7 우태민, 박범순 (2014), Post-ELSI 지형도: 합성생물학 거버넌스와 '수행되지 않은 사회과학', 과학기술학연구 14(2), 85-125쪽.
8 이진우 (2013), 테크노인문학 (서울: 책세상).
9 추병완 옮김(2015), 미래사회를 위한 준비: 도덕적 생명 향상 (서울: 하우).
10 카우시크 순데르 라잔, 안수진 역 (2012), 생명자본: 게놈 이후 생명의 구성 (서울: 그린비).
11 Achenbach, J. (2016), ʻAfter secrete Harvard meeting, scientists announce plans for synthetic human genomesʼ, The Washington Post (2016. 6. 2).
12 김훈기 (2004), 유전자가 세상을 바꾼다 (파주: 궁리).
13 김훈기 (2010), 합성생명 (서울: 이음).
14 동아사이언스 (2014. 9. 5), 바이오디자이너는 뭘 디자인할까.
15 미디어펜 (2016. 3. 25), 최소유전체합성세균 제작, '맞춤형 인공세포' 발명 앞당겨.
16 사이언스온 (2010. 5. 24), '합성게놈' 통째로 이식, 박테리아 종을 바꾸다.
17 신상규 (2012), 트랜스휴머니즘, 세상에서 가장 위험한 생각?, 철학 논집 29, 189-217쪽.
18 Daston, L. and Vidal, F. (2004), The Moral Authority of Nature (Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press).
19 Endy, D. (2005), ʻFoundations for Engineering Biologyʼ, Nature 438, pp. 449-453.   DOI
20 Fukuyama, F. (2004), ʻTranshumanism: The World's Most Dangerous Ideaʼ, Foreign Policy 144 (Sep. -Oct., 2004), pp.42-43.
21 Gardels, N. (2015), ʻGenome Pioneer: We have the dangerous power to control evolutionʼ (An interview with genome and synthetic life scientist J. Craig Venter), The World Post (2015. 9. 10).
22 Garfinkel, M.S. and Friedman, R.M. (2010), ʻSynthetic Biology and Synthetic Genomicsʼ in Leary, D. and Pisupati, B eds. (2010), The Future of International Environmental Law (New York: United Nations University Press).
23 Genewatch (2016. 11. 20), ʻMeiogenics: Synthetic Biology Meets Transhumanismʼ, Accessible at: http://www.councilforresponsiblegenetics.org/genewatch/GeneWatchPage.asp x?pageId=411#
24 Ginsberg, A. D., Calvert, J., Schyfter, P., Elfick, A. and Endy, D. (2014), Synthetic Aesthetics: Investigating Synthetic Biology's Designs on Nature (Cambridge and London: The MIT Press).
25 Arnold, F. H. (1998), ʻDesign by Directed Evolutionʼ, Acc. Chem. Res 31, pp. 125-131.   DOI
26 Bohannon, J. (2011), ʻThe Life Hackerʼ, Science 333(6047), pp. 1236-1237.   DOI
27 Bostrom, N. (2003), ʻThe Transhumanist FAQ: A General Introductionʼ, World Transhumanist Association.
28 Bostrom, N. (2005), ʻA History of Transhumanist Thoughtʼ, Journal of Evolution and Technology 14(1). Reprinted in Rectenwald, M. and Carl, L. (2011), Academic Writing Across the Disciplines (New York: Pearson Longman).
29 Bostrom, N. and Sandberg, A. (2008), ʻThe Wisdom of Nature: An Evolutionary Heuristic for Human Enhancementʼ in Bostrom, N. and Savulescu, J. eds., Human Enhancement (Oxford University Press).
30 Calvert, J. (2008), ʻThe Commodification of Emergence: Systems Biology, Synthetic Biology and Intellectual Propertyʼ, Biosocieties 3, pp. 383-398.   DOI
31 Calvert, J. (2010), ʻSynthetic Biology: Constructing Nature?ʼ, The Sociological Review 58, pp.95-112.   DOI
32 Church G. and Regis E. (2012), Regenesis: How Synthetic Biology Will Reinvent Nature and Ourselves (New York: Basic Books).
33 Cobb, R. E., Sun, N. and Zhao, H. (2013), ʻDirected Evolution as a Powerful Synthetic Biology Tool,ʼ Methods 60(1), pp. 81-90.   DOI
34 Mirowski, P. (2011), Science-mart: Privatizing American Science (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).
35 Morton, O. (2005), ʻLife, Reinventedʼ, Wired (2005. 1. 1).
36 Reardon, S. (2015), ʻGene-editing record smashed in pigsʼ, Nature (2015. 10. 6).
37 Rojahn, S. Y. (2013), ʻNew Genome-Editing Method Could Make Gene Therapy More Precise and Effectiveʼ, MIT Technology Review (2013. 11. 27).
38 Huxley, J. (1957), ʻTranshumanismʼ, in Huxley J. ed. (1957), New Bottles for New Wine (London: Chatto & Windus).
39 Interlandi, J. (2015), ʻThe Church of George Churchʼ, Popular Science (2015. 5. 27).
40 Kevles, D. J. and Hood, L. eds. (1992), The Code of Codes: Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
41 Knight, M. (2015), "Why are scientists vilified when they profit from their innovations?", Genetic Literacy Project (2015. 2. 26).
42 Miller, P. (2014), ʻGeorge Church: The Future Without Limitʼ, National Geographic (2014. 6. 2).
43 Savulescu, J. (2003), "Human-Animal Transgenesis and Chimeras Might Be an Expression of Our Humanity". Journal of Bioethics 3, pp. 22-24.
44 Service, R. F. (2016), ʻSynthetic microbe lives with fewer than 500 genesʼ, Science (2016. 3. 24).
45 Shapin, S. (2008), The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
46 Silver, P. A., Way. J. C., Arnold, F. H. and Meyerowitz, J. T. (2014), ʻSynthetic Biology: Engineering Explored,ʼ Nature 509(7499), pp.166-7.   DOI
47 SingularityHub (2016. 2. 7), ʻUK Will Use CRISPR on Human Embry os - a Step Closer to Human Genome Editingʼ, Accessible at: http://singularityhub.com/2016/02/07/uk-will-use -crispr-on-human-embryos-a-step-closer-to-huma n-genome-editing/
48 Sleator, R. D. (2010), ʻThe Story of Mycoplasma mycoides JCVI-syn1.0ʼ, Bioengineered Bugs 1(4), pp. 229-230.   DOI
49 Smolke, C. D. (2009), ʻBuilding Outside of the Box: iGEM and the BioBricks Foundation,ʼ Nature Biotechnology 27, pp. 1099-1102.   DOI
50 Specter, M. (2009), ʻA Life of Its Own: Where Will Synthetic Biology Lead Us?ʼ, The New Yorker (2009. 9. 28).
51 The Economist (2014. 9. 14), ʻWelcome to My Genomeʼ.
52 Turda, M. ed. (2013), Crafting Humans: From Genesis to Eugenics and Beyond (Goettingen: V&R unipress).