Browse > Article

Evaluation of the World Wide Views on Climate and Energy in Seoul: Global framing and Local setting  

Park, Juhyung (가톨릭대학교 사회학과)
Lee, Yun Jeong (가톨릭대학교 인문사회연구소)
Publication Information
Journal of Science and Technology Studies / v.15, no.2, 2015 , pp. 33-64 More about this Journal
Abstract
World Wide Views (WWViews) on Climate and Energy was an experiment of public deliberation which was held in 77 countries with over 10,000 global citizens on June 6, 2015. The coordinator of this project (the Danish Board of Technology with Missions Publiques and the French National Commission for Public Debate) developed the overal procedure, and local partners implemented the actual events in each country on the same day. The coordinator gathered the results of the events from all local sites in order to submit them as global citizens' voice to the COP21 negotiations at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) in Paris. This study examines the extent to which such new method of WWViews, standardized at global level to be implemented in different local contexts, achieves its quality of public deliberation (representativeness, transparency, impartial inclusion, deliberativeness, influence) by evaluating the Korean WWViews held in Seoul.
Keywords
Climate change governance; World Wide Views; global citizens' voice; public deliberation; evaluation;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Blue, G. & Medlock, J. (2014), "Public Engagement with Climate Change as Scientific Citizenship: A Case Study of World Wide Views on Global Warming", Science as Culture, Vol.23, No.4, pp. 560-579.   DOI
2 Burgess, J. & Chilvers, J. (2006), "Upping the ante:a conceptual framework for designing and eveluating participatory technology assessments", Science and Public Policy, Vol.33, No.10, pp.713-728.   DOI
3 Carson, L. & Hartz-Karp, J. (2005), "Adapting and Combining Deliberative Design: Juries, Polls, and Forums", in J. Gastil & P. Levine. Jossey-Bass Ed., The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Civic Engagement in the Twenty-First Century, pp.120-138, San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
4 DBTF. (2015), Manual for World Wide Views on Climate and Energy, Copenhagen: The Danish Board of Technology Fund.
5 Dryzek, J. (2000), Deliberative Democracy and Beyond, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6 Elster, J. (1998), Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7 Hendriks, C. (2004), Public Deliberation and Interest Organizations: A Study of Responses to Lay Citizens Engagement in Public Policy, A Doctoral thesis submitted to the Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
8 Medlock, J. (2014), Fostering environmental citizenship through public deliberation: Investigating Canadian participation perspectives from the World Wide Views on Global Warming initiative, A Doctoral thesis submitted to University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
9 Petts, J. & Leach, B. (2000), Evaluating methods for public participation: Literature review, R&D Technical Report: E135, Environment Agency.
10 Rask, M. & Laihonen, M. (2011), "WWViews and Lobbying in Finnish Climate Politics", in Rask, M., Worthington, R. & Lammi, M. Ed., Citizen Participation in Global Environmental Governance, pp.203-220, Earthscan Publications.
11 Rowe, G. & Frewer, L. (2000), "Public Participation Metods: A Framework for Evaluation", Science, Technology, and Human Values, Vol.25, No.1, pp.3-29.   DOI
12 Schneider, J. & Delborne, J. (2011), "Seeking the Spotlight: WWViews and the US Media Context", in Rask, M., Worthington, R. & Lammi, M. Ed., Citizen Participation in Global Environmental Governance, pp.241-260, Earthscan Publications.
13 Webler, T. (1995), "Right" Discourse in Citizen Participation: An evaluative yardstick. In O. Renn, T. Webler,& P. Wiedelmann Ed., Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse, pp. 35-86, Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Press.
14 Abelson, J. et al. (2003), "Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes", Social Science & Medicine, 57, pp. 239-251.   DOI
15 이영희 (2008), 과학기술 민주화 기획으로서의 합의회의 : 한국의 경험, 동향과 전망, 통권 73호, 한국사회과학연구소, pp. 294-324.
16 이영희 (2013), 서울시의 참여적 시정개혁 평가: 서울플랜 수립과정을 중심으로, 경제와 사회, 통권 제98호. 비판사회학회, pp.106-133.
17 제임스 피시킨, 김원용 번역 (2003), 민주주의와 공론조사, 이화여자대학교 출판부. [James Fishkin. (1993), Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform, Yale University Press.]
18 Bloomfield, D., Collins, K., Fry, C. & Munton, R. (2001) "Deliberation andInclusion: Vehicles for Increasing Trust in UK Public Governance?", Environment and Planning C : Governmentand Policy, 19(4), pp.501-513.   DOI