Browse > Article

The Ethical Regime and Technological Citizenship in Software Oriented Society  

Kim, Seungeun (KAIST 과학기술정책대학원)
Kim, Hyomin (UNIST 기초과정부)
Publication Information
Journal of Science and Technology Studies / v.15, no.2, 2015 , pp. 263-301 More about this Journal
Abstract
Digital inclusion is the ability or opportunities of individuals and groups to access and use information technology (IT). Digital inclusion strategies aims to ensure that all citizens regardless of their gender, race and class benefit from IT. Discourse of digital inclusion is notable in that it proposes a desirable relationship between the state, individuals, and the market within the shifting topology of technoscience. Throughout broad discourse analysis of media coverages, in-depth interviews and reports on Korean IT industry, this research argues that dialogues on digital inclusion have substantially influenced the formation of a specific ethical regime. In this regime, individuals should become subjects embodying IT expertise and acceptable codes of conducts. We further discuss that such government-driven ethical regime conflicts with technological citizenship practiced by IT experts and semi-experts. We make theoretical contribution to STS by expanding the concept of technological citizenship to include the rights and obligations of heterogeneous expert and semi-expert groups to form, propose and socially demand alternative developmental pathways of technoscience. We also note that, amid the conflict between ethical regime and technological citizenship, alternative interpretations of gender gap can be forged, providing competing perspectives on women's under-representation and labor conditions in the IT industry. Further research is required to capture the emergence of multiple identities--differentiated by gender, race, class, and more--within the clashing interface between the ethical regime and technological citizenship.
Keywords
Technological citizenship; Information Technology; gender; ethical regime;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 고용노동부 (각 연호), 고용형태별근로실태조사 보고서
2 구도완 (2013), 환경사회학의 쟁점, 경제와사회, 제100호, pp. 273-91.
3 김기흥 (2012), 동아시아 생명과학의 발전과 바이오시민권의 형성가능성, 아시아리뷰, 제2권 제2호, pp. 43-63.
4 김영옥 (2001), 여성 IT 인력의 현황과 잠재력 분석, 한국여성학, 제17권 제2호, pp. 5-34.
5 김지연 (2015), 국가정보화법 속의 시민: 좋은 거버넌스를 향해, 비판사회학회 발표.
6 김지형.김효민 (2014), 과학기술 젠더 불균형: 현황과 과제, 과학기술학연구, 제14권 제2호, pp. 251-80.
7 김태은 (2013), 여성과 ICT에 대한 국제적 논의의 추이와 함의, 방송통신정책, 제25권 제6호, pp. 1-24.
8 박순열 (2010), 한국 생태시티즌십(ecologial citizenship) 인식유형에 관한 경험적 연구, 환경사회학연구 ECO, 제14권 제2호, pp. 7-52.
9 성지은 (2003), 정보통신산업의 정책진화: 이동통신사업자 선정사례를 중심으로, 한국행정학보, 제37권 제2호, pp. 333-353.
10 소프트웨어정책연구소 (2014), 2014 소프트웨어 산업 실태조사 분석 연구, 미래창조과학부.
11 이경남 (2013), ICT 부문 여성 인력 현황 및 시사점, 방송통신정책, 25(14): 1-23.
12 이경선.최충.이경남.송헌재 (2014), ICT 산업 내에서 성별임금격차 분석, 정보통신정책연구원 연구보고서.
13 이경선.나성현.이경남.최충 (2014), ICT 여성인력 고용현황 및 고용률 제고방안 연구, 정보통신정책연구원 연구보고서.
14 이영희 (2014), 과학기술 시티즌십의 두 유형과 전문성의 정치: 과학기술 대중화 정책과 '차일드세이브'의 활동을 중심으로, 동향과 전망, 제92호, pp. 174-211.
15 여성과학기술인지원센터 (2014), 2013년도 여성과학기술인력 활용 실태조사 보고서, 미래창조과학부.
16 한국정보화진흥원 (2011), 2011 국가정보화백서, 한국정보화진흥원.
17 홍덕화.이영희(2014), 한국의 에너지 운동과 에너지 시티즌십: 유형과 특징, 환경사회학연구 ECO, 제18권 제1호, pp. 7-44.
18 Chakravartty, P., & Sarkar, S. (2013), "Entrepreneurial justice: The new spirit of capitalism in emergent India", Popular Communication, Vol. 11(1), pp. 58-75.   DOI
19 Cooper, M. (2000), "Being the "go-to guy": fatherhood, masculinity and the organization of work in Silicon Valley", Qualitative Sociology, Vol. 23(4), pp. 379-405.   DOI
20 Cussins, C. (1996), "Ontological choreography: Agency through objectification in infertility clinics", Social Studies of Science, Vol. 26(3), pp. 575-610.   DOI
21 Dasgupta, S. (2008), "Success, market, ethics: Information technology and the shifting politics of governance and citizenship in the Indian silicon plateau", Cultural Dynamics, Vol. 20(3), pp. 213-44.   DOI
22 Frankenfeld, P. (1992), "Technological citizenship: A normative framework for risk studies", Science, Technology & Human Values Vol. 17(4), pp. 459-84.   DOI
23 Edwards, P. (1990), "The army and the microworld: Computers and the militarized politics of gender", Signs, Vol. 16(1), pp. 102-27.   DOI
24 Epstein, S. (1993) Impure science; AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge, University of California Press.
25 Faulkner, W. (2004), Strategies of inclusion: Gender and the information society, Final Report, Univeristy of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.
26 Hacker, S. (1989), Pleasure, power, and technology: some tales of gender, engineering, and the cooperative workplace, Routledge.
27 Helsper, E. (2011), The emergence of a digital underclass: digital policies in the UK and evidence for inclusion LSE Media Policy Project Series, Sally M., Zoetanya S., and Tambini, D. (eds) Media policy brief 3. Department of media and communications, London School of Economics and Political Science.
28 Irani, L. (2015), "Hackathons and the Making of Entrepreneurial Citizenship", Science Technology and Human Values, Vol. 40(5), pp. 799-824.   DOI
29 Irwin, A. (1995), Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development, London: Routledge.
30 Irwin A (2001), "Constructing the scientific citizen: Science and democracy in the biosciences", Public Understanding of Science, Vol. 10(1), pp. 1-18.   DOI
31 Irwin A & Wynne B (1996), Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32 Kendall, L. (2000), "'Oh no! I'm a nerd!': Hegemonic masculinity on an online forum", Gender and Society, Vol. 14(2), pp. 256-274.   DOI
33 Jasanoff, S. (2005), Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34 Jasanoff, S. & Kim, S. (2009), "Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea", Minerva, Vol. 47(2), pp. 119-146.   DOI
35 Kendall, L. (1999), "The nerd within: Mass media and the negotiation of identity among computer-using men", Journal of Men's Studies, Vol. 99(7), 353-367.
36 Largesen, V. (2007), "The Strength of Numbers: Strategies to Include Women into Computer Science", Social Studies of Science, Vol. 37(1), pp. 67-92.   DOI
37 Latour, B. (1987), Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society, Harvard University Press
38 Latour, B. (2003), "What If We Talked Politics a Little?," Contemporary Political Theory, Vol. 2(2), pp. 143-164.   DOI
39 Law, J. (1987), Technology and heterogeneous engineering: The case of Portuguese Expansion. In W. e. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, & T. J. Pinch (eds.), The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology (pp. 111-134). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
40 Livingstone, S. & Helsper, E. (2007), "Gradations in digital inclusion: children, young people and the digital divide", New Media and Society, Vol. 9(4). pp. 671-696.   DOI
41 Margolis, J. and Fisher, A. (2002), Unlocking the Clubhouse: Women in Computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42 Ong, A. & Collier, S. (2008), Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, Malden Blackwell.
43 Marshall, T. (1950), Citizenship and Social Class in Citizenship Debates: A Reader ed. by Gershon Shafir, Minneapolis : University of Minnesota Press.
44 McKinsey & Company (2010), Women at the top of corporations: Making it happen, Women Matter report.
45 Mouffe, Chantal (1992), "Democratic citizenship and the political community", in Chantal Mouffe ed. Dimensions of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship , Community, London: Verso.
46 Oudshoorn, N., Rommes, E., and Stienstra, M. (2004), "Configuring the User as Everybody: Gender and Design Cultures in Information and Communication Technologie", Science, Technology and Human Values, Vol. 29(1), pp. 30-63.   DOI
47 Pickering, A. (2005), "Synthetic dyes and social theory", Perspectives on Science, Vol. 13(3), pp. 352-405.   DOI
48 Pinch, T. & Bijker, W. (1984), "The Social Construction of Facts and Artifacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might benefit each other", Social Studies of Science, Vol. 14, pp. 339-441.
49 Rommes, E., van Slooten I., van Oost, E. and Oudshoorn, N. (2004), Designing Inclusion: The development of ICT products to include women in the Information Society, Trondheim, Centre for Technology and Society, NTNU.
50 Sorensen, K. H., Faulkner, W. & Rommes, E. W. M. (2011), Technologies of Inclusion: Gender in the Information Society. Trondheim, Tapir Akademisk Forlag.
51 Sorensen, K. H. (2004). Gender and inclusion policies for the information society, Trondheim, Centre for Technology and Society, NTNU.
52 Winner, L. (1980), "Do artifacts have politics?", Daedalus, Vol. 109(1), pp. 121-136.
53 Traweek, S. (1988) Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physics, Cambridge, Harvard University Press
54 Turkle, S. (1984), The second self: Computers and the human spirit, New York, Simon and Schuster.
55 Turner, B. and Hamilton, P. (1994), (eds) Citizenship: Critical Concepts, London; Routledge.
56 Woodhouse, E. and Patton, J. (2004), "Design by Society: Science and Technology Studies and the Social Shaping of Design", Design Issues, Vol. 20(3), pp. 1-12.   DOI