1 |
김동광 (2002), 생명공학과 시민참여: 재조합 DNA 논쟁에 대한 사례 연구, 과학기술학연구, 제2권 제1호
|
2 |
김명수 (1993), 공공정책평가론, 박영사
|
3 |
김왕동, 성지은, 송위진 (2014), 사회문제 해결형 R&D를 위한 출연연의 평가시스템 개선방향, 과학기술학연구, 제14권 제1호
|
4 |
김왕동, 송위진, 성지은 (2013), 과학기술혁신을 통한 창조경제와 국민행복의 선순환, 과학기술정책연구원 Issue & Policy, 67: 1-17
|
5 |
김태희 (2012), 국가연구개발사업을 통한 국제공동연구 성과 제고 방안에 대한 연구, 기술혁신학회지, 제15권 제2호: 400-420
|
6 |
박성민 (2011), R&D 프로젝트의 성과평가를 위한 DEA 효율성 지수와 정규화지표의 합치도 분석, 대한경영학회지, 제24권 제4호
|
7 |
성지은, 김미, 임홍탁, 김은정 (2014), 연구개발사업의 사회적 파급효과 분석 가능성과 과제, 과학기술학 연구, 제14권 제2호, 한국과학기술학회
|
8 |
성지은 (2012), 과학기술조정체계의 변화 분석: 일본, 미국, 핀란드 과학기술조정체계를 중심으로, 한국정책과학학회보, 제16권 제2호: 213-238
|
9 |
송성수 (2001), 과학기술과 사회의 채널 구축을 위한 정책방향, 과학기술정책, 131, 과학기술정책연구원
|
10 |
송위진, 성지은, 임홍탁, 장영배 (2013), 사회문제 해결형 연구개발사업 발전방안 연구, 정책연구, 과학기술정책연구원
|
11 |
송위진 (2014), 사회문제 해결형 연구개발사업의 의의와 과제, 과학기술정책, 제24권 제2호, 과학기술정책연구원
|
12 |
송위진 (2005), 국가연구개발사업과 시민참여; 현황과 의의, 경제와 사회, 67
|
13 |
양희승 (2004), 연구평가지표의 개선방안: 국가연구개발사업을 중심으로, 2004 동계학술대회, 한국행정학회
|
14 |
이영희 (2014), 과학기술 시티즌십의 두 유형과 전문성의 정치, 동향과 전망, 92
|
15 |
이영희 (2000), 과학기술의 사회학: 과학기술과 현대사회에 대한 성찰, 한울아카데미
|
16 |
이영희 (1995), 과학기술과 사회의 상호관계, 연구보고, 95-25, 과학기술정책관리연구소
|
17 |
이우성, 송치웅, 현성재, 김보현 (2010), 과학기술의 선진화를 위한 지표개발 연구, 정책연구, 2010.12
|
18 |
정인숙 (2008), 디지털전환 정책에 대한 형성평가 분석, 한국방송학보, 제22권 제5호
|
19 |
Arnason, V. (2012), "Scientific citizenship in a democratic society", Public Understanding of Science, 22(8): 927-940
DOI
|
20 |
한재각 (2004), 국가연구개발사업 개혁을 위한 시민사회의 시각: 분석틀과 평가기준의 제안, 과학기술학연구, 제4권 제2호, 한국과학기술학회
|
21 |
Bammer, G. (2005), "Integration and Implementation Sciences: Building a new Specialization", Ecology and Society, 10(2)
|
22 |
Banthien, H and Herz, J. (2001), "Evaluation of internet-based discourses concerning innovation and technical analyses", discussion paper, conference e-society, Berlin.
|
23 |
Berman, P., & M. McLaughlin (1977), Federal programs supporting educational change, Santa Monica, Rand Corporation
|
24 |
Callon, M. (1989), Society in the Making: The Study of Technology as a Tool for Sociological Analysis, in Bijker et al. 83-103
|
25 |
Callon, M. (1999), "The Role of Lay People in the Production and Dissemination of Scientific Knowledge", Science, Technology and Society, 4: 81-94
DOI
|
26 |
COPUS (1995), Wolfendale Report, http://www.dti.gov.uk/ost/ostbusiness/index.htm
|
27 |
Cousins, J. & Earl, L. (1992), "The case for participatory evaluation", Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(4): 397-418
DOI
|
28 |
Cousins, J. & Whitmore, E. (1998), "Framing Participatory Evaluation, In E. Whitmore, Ed, Understanding and Practicing Participatory Evaluation", New Directions for Evaluation 80.
|
29 |
Cullen, A. (2009), The politics and consequences of stakeholder participation in international development evaluations, doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo
|
30 |
Daigneault, P. & Jacob, S. (2009), "Toward Accurate Measurement of Participation: Rethinking the Conceptualization and Operationalization of Participatory Evaluation", American Journal of Evaluation, 30(3): 330-348
DOI
|
31 |
Damasio, A. (1995), Decartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain. New York: Harpercollins
|
32 |
Delanty, G. (2001), "The University in the Knowledge Society", Organization, 8(2): 149-153
DOI
|
33 |
Delemarle, A. (2014), "A rationale for public intervention in disruptive technological development: public policy tools as trust-enabling mechanisms", Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 26(1)
|
34 |
Delvenne, P., Fallon, C. and Brunet, S. (2011), "Parliamentary Technology Assessment as Indications of Reflexive Modernization", Technology in Society, 33: 36-43
DOI
|
35 |
Derrick, G. & Pavone, V. (2013), "Democratising research evaluation: Achieving greater public engagement with bibliometrics-informed peer review", Science and Public Policy, 40: 563-575
DOI
|
36 |
Dryzek, J. (2000), Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics and Contestations, Oxford: Oxford University Press
|
37 |
Fawcett, S., Lewis A., Andrews, A, Francisco, V., Richter, K., Williams E. & Copple, B. (1997), "Evaluating Community Coalitions for Prevention of Substance Abuse: The Case of Project Freedom", Health Education and Behaviour, 24(6): 812-828
DOI
|
38 |
Feenberg, A. (1999), Questioning Technology, London and New York: Routledge
|
39 |
Fetterman, D, Kaftarian, S. & Wandersman, A. (1996), Empowerment Evaluation: Knowledge and Tools for Self-assessment and Accountability, London: Sage
|
40 |
Felt, U., Fochler, M. & Winkler, P. (2010), "Coming to terms with biomedical technologies in different technopolitical cultures: A comparative analysis of focus groups on organ transplantation and genetic testing in Austria, France and the Netherlands", Science, Technology & Human Values, 35: 525-553
DOI
|
41 |
Flora, J., Maccoby, N. and Farquahar, J. (1989), Communication campaigns to prevent cardiovascular disease, The Stanford studies, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA
|
42 |
Funtowicz, S. & Ravetz, J. (1993), "Science for the post-normal age", Futures, 25: 739-755
DOI
|
43 |
Genus, A. & Coles, A. (2005), "Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions", research policy, 37: 1436-1445
|
44 |
Geurts, J. and Mayer, I. (1996), Methods for participatory policy analysis: Towards a conceptual model for research and development. Work and Organization Research Centre Report, 96.12.008/3, Tilburg
|
45 |
Glenn, J. (2003), Framing Democracy, Civil Society and Civic Movements in Eastern Europe, Stanford: Stanford University Press
|
46 |
Gouldner, A. (1976), The dialectic of ideology and technology, New York: Oxford University Press
|
47 |
Greene, J. (2013), "Logic and evaluation theory", Evaluation and Program Planning, 38: 71-73
DOI
|
48 |
Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y. (1989), Fourth Generation Evaluation, Newbury Park, SAGE
|
49 |
Irwin, A. (2006), "The Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms with New Scientific Governance", Social Studies of Science, 36(2): 299-320
DOI
|
50 |
Hrzonsky, J. and Houghton, K. (2001), "The meaning of a defined accounting concept", Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(2): 123-139
DOI
|
51 |
Isin, E. F. & Turner, B.S. (2002), Citizenship studies: An introduction, Handbook of Citizenship Studies, London: SAGE
|
52 |
Jacques Ellul, (1964), The Technological Society, trans. John Wilkinson, New York
|
53 |
Jasanoff, S. (2004), States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, London, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
|
54 |
Krimsky, S. (1984), Beyond Technocracy: New Routes for Citizen Involvement in Social Risk Assessment, Univ. Mass. Press
|
55 |
Lengwiler, M. (2008), "Participatory approaches in science and technology", Science, Technology and Human Values, 33: 186-200
DOI
|
56 |
Lotter, D. (2008), "The genetic engineering of food and the failure of science, part 2: Academic capitalism and the loss of scientific integrity", International Journal of the Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 16: 50-68
|
57 |
March, J. & Sevon, G. (1988), "Gossip, Information and Decision-making", in James G. march(ed.), Decisions and Organizations, pp 429-424, Cambridge, Basil Blackwell
|
58 |
Mark, M. & Henry, G. (2004), "The mechanisms and outcomes of evaluation influence", Evaluation, 10(1): 35-57
DOI
|
59 |
Mathison, S. (2005), Encyclopedia of evaluation, Thousand Oaks, Sage
|
60 |
Mejlgaard, N. & Stares, S. (2010), "Participation and competence as joint components in a cross-national analysis of scientific citizenship", Public Understanding of Science, 19(5): 545-561
DOI
|
61 |
Mejlgaard, N., Ravn, T. and Degn, L. (2010), Monitoring Policy and Resaerch Activities on Science in Society in Europe, The Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy, 17 s.
|
62 |
Mertens D. & Wilson, A. (2012), Program Evaluation Theory and Practice: A Comprehensive Guide, New York: Guilford
|
63 |
Murray, T. and Mehlman, M. (2000), Encyclopedia of ethical, legal, and policy issues in biotechnology, New York: John Wiley & Sons, volumes 2
|
64 |
Nelkin D. (1978), "Threats and Promises: Negotiating the Control of Research", Daedalus 107: 191-209
|
65 |
Nowotny, H. (2003), "Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge", Science and Public Policy, 30: 151-156
DOI
|
66 |
Patton, M. (1997), Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text, Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications
|
67 |
Rask M, and Worthington, R. (2011), Towards a new concept of global governance. In: Worthington R, Rask M, Lammi M (eds) Citizen Participation in Global Environmental Governance, London: Verso, pp. 1-19
|
68 |
Rask, M. (2013), "The Tragedy of Citizen Deliberation - Two Cases of Participatory Technology Assessment", Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 25(1): 39-55
DOI
|
69 |
Rose, H. and Rose, S. (1976), The Political Economy of the Natural Sciences, London: Macmillan
|
70 |
Rossi, P., Lipsey, M. and Freeman, H. (2004), Evaluation: A System Approach, London: Sage
|
71 |
Schwartzenberg, R. G. (2001), Dix mesures pour rapprocher scienc e et societe, http://www.recherche.gouv.fr/discours/2001/voeux.htm
|
72 |
Rowe, G. and Frewer, L. (2005), "A typology of public engagement mechanism", Science, Technology and Human Values, 30: 251-290
DOI
|
73 |
Rowe, G. & Fewer, L. (2004), "Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda", Science, Technology and Human Values, 29: 512-556
DOI
|
74 |
Saurugger, S. (2010), "The social construction of the participatory turn: The emergence of a norm in the European Union", European Journal of Political Research, 49: 471-495
DOI
|
75 |
Scriven, M. (2001), "Evaluation: Future tense", American Journal of Evaluation, 22(3): 301-307
DOI
|
76 |
Shadish, W. & Epstein, R. (1987), "Patterns of program evaluation practice among members of the evaluation research society and evaluation network", Evaluation Review, 11: 555-590
DOI
|
77 |
Touraine, A. (1971), The Post-Industrial Society: Tomorrow's Social History: Classes, Conflicts and Culture in the Programmed Society, New York: Random House
|
78 |
Van Oudheusden, M. (2014), "Where are the Politics in Responsible Innovation? European Governance, Technology Assessment, and Beyond", Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1(1): 67-86
DOI
|
79 |
von Hippel, E. (2005), Democratizing innovation, Cambridge: The MIT Press
|
80 |
Walter, A., Helgenberger, S., Wiek, A., and Scholz, R. (2007), "Measuring Societal Effects of Transdisciplinary Research Projects", Evaluation and Program Planning, 30(4): 325-338
DOI
|
81 |
Wynne, B. (1989), "Sheepfarming after Chenobyl: A case study in communicating scientific information", Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 31:10-39
|
82 |
Weiss, C. (1998), "Have we learned anything new about the use of evaluation?", American Journal of Evaluation, 19:21-33
DOI
|
83 |
Weiss, C. (1999), "The Interface between Evaluation and Public Policy", Evaluation, 5(4): 468-486
DOI
|