1 |
Iversen, E., & Jonsdottir, G. (2019). 'We did see the lapwing' - practising environmental citizenship in upper-secondary science education. Environmental Education Research, 25(3), 411-421.
DOI
|
2 |
Jenkins, E. W. (1990). Scientific literacy and school science education. School Science Review, 71(256), 43-51.
|
3 |
Jenkins, E. W. (1999). School science, citizenship and the public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), 703-710.
DOI
|
4 |
Beck, U. (1997). Risk society - Towards a new modernity, (trans., Hong, S.). Seoul: Saemulgyul.
|
5 |
Zeidler, D. L., Herman, B. C., Ruzek, M., Linder, A., & Lin, S. S. (2013). Cross-cultural epistemological orientations to socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 251-283.
DOI
|
6 |
Rudolph, J. L., & Horibe, S. (2016). What do we mean by science education for civic engagement? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(6), 805-820.
DOI
|
7 |
Ryder, J. (2001). Identifying Science Understanding for Functional Scientific Literacy. Studies in Science Education, 36(1), 1-44.
DOI
|
8 |
Sadler, T. D. (2009). Situated learning in science education: socio-scientific issues as contexts for practice. Studies in Science Education, 45(1), 1-42.
DOI
|
9 |
Jeon, S. J., Koh, H. Y., Lee, Y. S., & Choi, S. Y. (2017). The needs analysis on science literacy required for Koreans in the future society. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(3), 441-452.
DOI
|
10 |
Jho, H., Yoon, H.-G., & Kim, M. (2014). The Relationship of Science Knowledge, Attitude and Decision Making on Socio-scientific Issues: The Case Study of Students' Debates on a Nuclear Power Plant in Korea. Science & Education, 23(5), 1131-1151.
DOI
|
11 |
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Applebaum, S., & Callahan, B. E. (2009). Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 74-101.
DOI
|
12 |
Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 39(1), 35-62.
DOI
|
13 |
DeBoer, G. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
|
14 |
Boeren, E., & Field, J. (2019). 4th Global Report on Adult Learning and Education: Leave No One Behind--Participation, Equity and Inclusion. UNESCO Institute for Lifelong Learning.
|
15 |
Carlone, H. B., Johnson, A., & Scott, C. M. (2015). Agency amidst formidable structures: How girls perform gender in science class. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(4), 474-488.
DOI
|
16 |
Christenson, N., Chang Rundgren, S.-N., & Hoglund, H.-O. (2012). Using the SEE-SEP Model to Analyze Upper Secondary Students' Use of Supporting Reasons in Arguing Socioscientific Issues. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 21(3), 342-352.
DOI
|
17 |
Delors, J. et al. (1996) Learning: the treasure within. Report to UNESCO of the international commission on education for the twenty-first century. Paris: UNESCO.
|
18 |
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112-138.
DOI
|
19 |
Sadler, T. D. (2011). Socio-scientific issues-based education: What we know about science education in the context of SSI. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific Issues in the Classroom (pp. 355-369): Springer.
|
20 |
Sadler, T. D., & Fowler, S. R. (2006). A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for socioscientific argumentation. Science education, 90(6), 986-1004.
DOI
|
21 |
Shamos, M. (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
|
22 |
Kim, J., & Lee, M. (2004). An international comparative study of science curriculum. Journal of the Korean association for science education, 24(6), 1082-1093.
|
23 |
Commission of the European Communities(2002). European Report on Quality Indicators of Lifelong Learning: Fifteen Quality Indicators. European Commission. Directorate-General for Education and Culture.
|
24 |
Jung, J.-C. (2015). A Meta Analysis of Korean Media Discourse Analysis Method Study. Journal of Speech, Media & Communication Research, 28(9), 297-322.
|
25 |
Kim, G., Ko, Y., & Lee, H. (2020). The Effects of Community-Based Socioscientific Issues Program (SSI-COMM) on Promoting Students' Sense of Place and Character as Citizens. International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education, 18(3), 399-418.
DOI
|
26 |
Kolsto, S. D. (2000). Consensus projects: Teaching science for citizenship. International Journal of Science Education, 22(6), 645-664.
DOI
|
27 |
National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
|
28 |
Roberts, D. A., & Bybee, R. W. (2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. In N. G. Lederman, S. K. Abell (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Science Education, Volume II, (pp. 559-572). Routledge.
|
29 |
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science education, 89(3), 357-377.
DOI
|
30 |
Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science education, 86(3), 343-367.
DOI
|
31 |
National Research Council (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press.
|
32 |
Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell, K. Appleton, & D. Hanuscin (Ed.), Handbook of research on science education, (pp. 743-794). Routledge.
|
33 |
Park, J. (2016). Discussions about the three aspects of scientific literacy: Focus on integrative understanding, settlement in curriculum, and civic education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(3), 413-422.
DOI
|
34 |
Park, S. H., Choe, S. U., & Kim, C. J. (2020). Elementary Students' Creativity Appear in Small Group Interactions During Model-Based Classrooms on Terraforming. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 40(6), 611-620.
|
35 |
Pella, M. O. (1967). Scientific literacy and the HS curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 67(4), 346-356.
DOI
|
36 |
Robottom, I. (2012). Socio-scientific issues in education: Innovative practices and contending epistemologies. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 95-107.
DOI
|
37 |
National Science Teachers Association (1982). Science-technology-society: Science education for the 1980s. Washington, D.C.: National Science Teachers Association.
|
38 |
Herman, B. C. (2018). Students' environmental NOS views, compassion, intent, and action: Impact of place-based socioscientific issues instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(4), 600-638.
DOI
|
39 |
Feinstein, N. W. (2011). Salvaging science literacy. Science education, 95(1), 168-185.
DOI
|
40 |
Fowler, S. R., Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2009). Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(2), 279-296.
DOI
|
41 |
Hodson, D. (2017). Foreword: The Significance of STEPWISE for Fostering Life-Long Sociopolitical Activism. In Science and Technology Education Promoting Wellbeing for Individuals, Societies and Environments, (pp. 3-18). Springer.
|
42 |
Kerckhoff, A. S., & Reis, G. (2014). Responsible stewards of the earth: Narratives of youth activism in high school (science). In Activist science and technology education, (pp. 465-476). Springer.
|
43 |
Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science education for everyday life: Evidence-based practice: Teachers College Press.
|
44 |
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states (vol. 1, The Standards). Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
|
45 |
Ottander, C., & Ekborg, M. (2012). Students' Experience of Working with Socioscientific Issues - a Quantitative Study in Secondary School. Research in Science Education, 42(6), 1147-1163.
DOI
|
46 |
Bencze, L., & Pouliot, C. (2017). Battle of the bands: Toxic dust, active citizenship and science education. In Science and technology education promoting wellbeing for individuals, societies and environments, (pp. 381-404). Springer.
|
47 |
Bencze, L., Sperling, E., & Carter, L. (2012). Students' Research-Informed Socio-scientific Activism: Re/Visions for a Sustainable Future. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 129-148.
DOI
|
48 |
AAAS (1989). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
|
49 |
Albe, V. (2008). Students' positions and considerations of scientific evidence about a controversial socioscientific issue. Science & Education, 17(8/9), 805-827.
DOI
|
50 |
Blondiaux, L., & Sintomer, Y. (2002). L'imperatif deliberatif. Politix. Revue des sciences sociales du politique, 15(57), 17-35.
|
51 |
Bosser, U., & Lindahl, M. (2019). Students' Positioning in the Classroom: a Study of Teacher-Student Interactions in a Socioscientific Issue Context. Research in Science Education, 49(2), 371-390.
DOI
|
52 |
Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., & Barthe, Y. (2001). Agir dans un monde incertain: essai sur la democratie technique: Seuil.
|
53 |
Dewey, J. (1927). The Public and its Problems. New York: Holt.
|
54 |
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning : experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
|
55 |
Kung, S.-H. (2016). Understanding Foucault: A Search for Alternative Approaches to Curriculum Studies. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(4), 197-221.
|
56 |
Lee, H., Lee, H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2020). Examining tensions in the socioscientific issues classroom: Students' border crossings into a new culture of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(5), 672-694.
DOI
|
57 |
Lee, S. (2018). Exploring an alternative direction for a competence-based curriculum in an age of uncertainty: An" ontological approach. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36(1), 45-69.
DOI
|
58 |
MOE (Ministry of Education) (2015). 2015 revised Science National Curriculum. Ministry of Education.
|
59 |
Solli, A., Bach, F., & Akerman, B. (2014). Learning to argue as a biotechnologist: disprivileging opposition to genetically modified food. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 9(1), 1-23.
DOI
|
60 |
Sjostrom, J., & Eilks, I. (2018). Reconsidering different visions of scientific literacy and science education based on the concept of Bildung. In Y. J. Dori, Z. R. Mevarech, & D. R. Baker (Ed.), Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education, pp. 65-88. Springer.
|
61 |
Sutter, A. M., Dauer, J. M., Kreuziger, T., Schubert, J., & Forbes, C. T. (2019). Sixth grade students' problematization of and decision-making about a wind energy socio-scientific issue. International Research in Geographical & Environmental Education, 28(3), 242-256.
DOI
|
62 |
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire (VNOS): Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497-521.
DOI
|
63 |
Bencze, L., Pouliot, C., Pedretti, E., Simonneaux, L., Simonneaux, J., & Zeidler, D. (2020). SAQ, SSI and STSE education: defending and extending "science-in-context". Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(3), 825-851.
DOI
|
64 |
Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S. W., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Reconceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670-697.
DOI
|
65 |
Karahan, E., & Roehrig, G. (2017). Secondary School Students' Understanding of Science and Their Socioscientific Reasoning. Research in Science Education, 47(4), 755-782.
DOI
|
66 |
Mun, K., Mun, J., Cho, M., Chung, Y., Kim, S. W., & Krajcik, J. (2012). Development and Application of 21st Century Scientific Literacy Evaluation Framework on Korean High School Science Text Books. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(5), 789-804.
DOI
|
67 |
Es, H., & Ozturk, N. (2021). An Activity for Transferring the Multidimensional Structure of SSI to Middle School Science Courses: I Discover Myself in the Decision-Making Process with SEE-STEP! Research in Science Education, 51(3), 889-910.
DOI
|
68 |
Dewey, J. (1910). Science as subject-matter and as method. Science, 31(787), 121-127.
DOI
|
69 |
Elo, S., & Kyngas, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115.
DOI
|
70 |
Chung, Y. L., & Choi, J. M. (2007). An assessment of the scientific literacy of secondary school students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 27(1), 9-17.
|
71 |
Han, S. (2009). Lifelong Education 3rd Ed. Seoul: Hakjisa.
|
72 |
Faure, E. et al. (1972) Learning to Be. The World of Education Today and Tomorrow. Paris: UNESCO.
|
73 |
Feinstein, N. W. (2015). Education, communication, and science in the public sphere. Journal of research in science teaching : the official journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 52(2), 145-163.
DOI
|
74 |
Field, J. (2000). Lifelong learning and the new educational order. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.
|
75 |
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536.
DOI
|
76 |
Patronis, T., Potari, D., & Spiliotopoulou, V. (1999). Students' argumentation in decision-making on a socio-scientific issue: implications for teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), 745-754.
DOI
|
77 |
Roberts, D. A. (2011). Competing visions of scientific literacy. In Linder, C., Ostman, L., Roberts, D. A., Wickman, P. O., Ericksen, G., & MacKinnon, A. (Eds.), Exploring the landscape of scientific literacy, (pp. 11-27).: Routledge.
|
78 |
Roth, W.-M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science education, 88(2), 263-291.
DOI
|
79 |
Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A., & Scott, B. (2007). What Do Students Gain by Engaging in Socioscientific Inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371-391.
DOI
|
80 |
Osborne, J. (2006). Towards a science education for all: The role of ideas, evidence and argument. Paper presented at the ACER Research Conference: Boosting Science Learning -What will it take?
|
81 |
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2009). Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 46(8), 909-921.
DOI
|
82 |
Simonneaux, L., & Simonneaux, J. (2009). Socio-scientific reasoning influenced by identities. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4(3), 705-711.
DOI
|
83 |
Song, J., Kang, S. J., Kwak, Y., Kim, D., Kim, S., Na, J., ... & Joung, Y. J. (2019). Contents and Features of 'Korean Science Education Standards (KSES)' for the Next Generation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(3), 465-478.
DOI
|
84 |
Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research, and practice. In N. G. Lederman, S. K. Abell (Ed.), Handbook of research on science education, Volume II, (pp. 711-740). Routledge.
|
85 |
Kolsto, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science education, 85(3), 291-310.
DOI
|
86 |
Kyle Jr, W. C. (1996). Shifting Ideologies and Science Education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), 1043-1044.
|
87 |
Lauri, S., & Kyngas, H. (2005). Developing nursing theories. Vantaa, Finland: Werner Soderstrom, Dark Oy.
|
88 |
Lee, H. (2018). What is SSI Education?. Seoul: PYMATE.
|
89 |
Lee, H., Chung, K., & Yoo, J. (2010). Perceptions of Science Teachers in Korea and US on Global Scientific Literacy. Journal of Curriculum Evaluation, 13(1), 143-163.
DOI
|
90 |
Hodson, D. (1999). Going beyond cultural pluralism: Science education for sociopolitical action. Science education, 83(6), 775-796.
DOI
|
91 |
Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645-670.
DOI
|
92 |
Hurd, P. D. (1958). Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools. Educational leadership, 16(1), 13-16.
|
93 |
Hwang, S. (2018). Research trend on the sociocultural approaches to science learning identity for the realization of 'Science Education for All'. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 38(2), 187-202.
|
94 |
Ideland, M., & Malmberg, C. (2012). Body talk: students' identity construction while discussing a socioscientific issue. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(2), 279-305.
DOI
|
95 |
Miller, J. D. (1998). The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public understanding of science, 7, 203-223.
DOI
|
96 |
Lee, H., Yoo, J., Choi, K., Kim, S.-W., Krajcik, J., Herman, B. C., & Zeidler, D. L. (2013). Socioscientific Issues as a Vehicle for Promoting Character and Values for Global Citizens. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2079-2113.
DOI
|
97 |
Lee, M. K., & Kim, J. H. (2004). An international comparative study of science curriculum. Journal of the Korean association for science education, 24(6), 1082-1093.
|
98 |
Levinson, R. (2010). Science education and democratic participation: An uneasy congruence? Studies in Science Education, 46(1), 69-119.
DOI
|
99 |
Chang Rundgren, S. N., & Rundgren, C. J. (2010). SEE-SEP: From a separate to a holistic view on socio-scientific issues. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 1-24.
|
100 |
Han, S., Yang, E., & Lim, H. (2020). Conceptual Ecology of 'Lifelong Learning:' Expansion, Interconnection and Evolution. Journal of Lifelong Education. 26(2), 1-39.
|
101 |
Jarvis, P. (2018). Learning to be a person in society. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary Theories of Learning (2nd ed.), (pp. 15-28). London: Routledge.
|
102 |
NILE (National Institute for Lifelong Education) (2020). The public's demand for the national responsibility for promoting lifelong education. National Institute for Lifelong Education.
|
103 |
AAAS (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy: A tool for curriculum reform. New York: Oxford University Press.
|
104 |
Barrue, C., & Albe, V. (2013). Citizenship Education and Socioscientific Issues: Implicit Concept of Citizenship in the Curriculum, Views of French Middle School Teachers. Science & Education, 22(5), 1089-1114.
DOI
|
105 |
Simonneaux, J., & Simonneaux, L. (2012). Educational Configurations for Teaching Environmental Socioscientific Issues Within The Perspective of Sustainability. Research in Science Education, 42(1), 75-94.
DOI
|
106 |
OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Education Working Papers.
|