1 |
Glenn, C. J. (1994). Future mind: Artificial intelligence: Merging the mystical and the technological. Washington, DC: Acropolis Books.
|
2 |
Choi, K. (2005). Contemplation of scientist's social role, responsibility and its educational methods. Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 10, 49-67.
|
3 |
Hong, S. (2016). Science-Technology-Society: Listening to science. Seoul: Dongasiabook.
|
4 |
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
|
5 |
Lee, H., Hwang, Y., Ko, Y., Choi, Y., Ok, S., Nam, C., Shim, S., & Kim, G. (2022). ENACT project. Seoul: Parkyoung Story.
|
6 |
Glerup, C., & Horst, M. (2014). Mapping 'social responsibility' in science. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1(1), 31-50.
DOI
|
7 |
Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
|
8 |
Ha, M., Shin, S., & Lee, J. (2019). Developing the questionnaire to measure the perception of the norms of science and applying to pre-service science reachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(4), 489-498.
DOI
|
9 |
Ko, Y., Shim, S. S., & Lee, H. (2021). Development and validation of a scale to measure Views of Social Responsibility of Scientists and Engineers (VSRoSE). International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. Online first.
|
10 |
Lee, H. (2018). What is SSI education? Seoul: Parkyoung Story.
|
11 |
Levrini, O., Tasquier, G., Branchetti, L., & Barelli, E. (2019). Developing future-scaffolding skills through science education. International Journal of Science Education, 41(18), 2647-2674.
DOI
|
12 |
Pimple, K. D. (2002). Six domains of research ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8(2), 191-205.
DOI
|
13 |
Schlossberger, E. (2016). Engineering codes of ethics and the duty to set a moral precedent. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(5), 1333-1344.
DOI
|
14 |
Wyndham, J. M., Albro, R., Ettinger, J., Smith, K., Sabatello, M., & Frankel, M. S. (2015). Social responsibility: A preliminary inquiry into the perspectives of scientists, engineers and health professionals. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
|
15 |
Stilgoe, J., Lock, S. J., & Wilsdon, J. (2014). Why should we promote public engagement with science? Public Understanding of Science, 23(1), 4-15.
DOI
|
16 |
Vanasupa, L., Slivovski, L., & Chen, K. C. (2006). Global challenges as inspiration: A classroom strategy to foster social responsibility. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(2), 373-380.
DOI
|
17 |
Wojcik, A., Hamza, K., Lundegard, I., Enghag, M., Haglund, K., Arvanitis, L., & Schenk, L. (2019). Educating about radiation risks in high schools: towards improved public understanding of the complexity of low-dose radiation health effects. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 58(1), 13-20.
DOI
|
18 |
Schenk, L., Hamza, K. M., Enghag, M., Lundegard, I., Arvanitis, L., Haglund, K., & Wojcik, A. (2019). Teaching and discussing about risk: Seven elements of potential significance for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 41(9), 1271-1286.
DOI
|
19 |
Tassone, V. C., O'Mahony, C., McKenna, E., Eppink, H. J., & Wals, A. E. (2018). (Re-)Designing higher education curricula in times of systemic dysfunction: A responsible research and innovation perspective. Higher Education, 76, 337-352.
DOI
|
20 |
Zandvoort, H., Borsen, T., Deneke, M., & Bird, J. (2013). Editors' overview: Perspectives on teaching social responsibility to students in science and engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19, 1413-1438.
DOI
|
21 |
Sakharov, A. (1981). The responsibility of scientists. Nature, 291, 184-185.
DOI
|
22 |
Amos, R., & Levinson, R. (2019). Socio-scientific inquiry-based learning: An approach for engaging with the 2030 sustainable development goals through school science. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, 11(1), 29-49.
DOI
|
23 |
Godhade, J., & Hundekari, S. (2018). Social responsibility of engineers. International Journal of Academic Research and Development, 3(2), 125-126.
|
24 |
Lathem, S. A., Neumann, M. D., & Hayden, N. (2011). The socially responsible engineer: Assessing student attitudes of roles and responsibilities. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3), 444-474.
DOI
|
25 |
Levinson, R. (2018). Introducing socio-scientific inquiry-based learning (SSIBL). School Science Review, 100(371), 31-35.
|
26 |
Levrini, O., Tasquier, G., Barelli, E., Laherto, A., Palmgren, E., Branchetti, L., & Wilson, C. (2021). Recognition and operationalization of future-scaffolding skills: Results from an empirical study of a teaching-learning module on climate change and futures thinking. Science Education, 105(2), 281-308.
DOI
|
27 |
Narayan, R., Park, S., Peker, D., & Suh, J. (2013). Students' images of scientists and doing science: An international comparison study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 9(2), 115-129.
|
28 |
Oviawe, J. I., Tazhenova, G. S., Azman, M. N. A., & Abdullah, A. S. (2021). Promoting students' academic performances and interests in blocklaying and concreting works using a futures-wheel instructional strategy versus problem solving: Implications for sustainable development. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 13(3), 79-92.
|
29 |
Sjostrom, J., & Eilks, I. (2018). Reconsidering different visions of scientific literacy and science education based on the concept of Bildung. In Y. J. Dori, Z. Mevarech, & D. Baker (Eds.), Cognition, metacognition, and culture in STEM education (pp. 65-88). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
|
30 |
Song, S. (2008). Discussion on the social responsibility of scientists and engineers revisited. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 11(2), 5-14.
DOI
|
31 |
Bernard, P., & Dudek, K. (2017). Revisiting students' perceptions of research scientist: Outcomes of an indirect draw-a-scientist test (INDAST). Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(4), 562-575.
DOI
|
32 |
Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2013). Teaching with and about nature of science, and science teacher knowledge domains. Science & Education, 22(9), 2087-2107.
DOI
|
33 |
Lee, H., Choi, Y., Nam, C., Ok, S., Shim, S., Hwang, Y., & Kim, G. (2020). Development of the ENACT model for cultivating social responsibility of college students in STEM fields. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 23(6), 3-16.
DOI
|
34 |
Ariza, M. R., Christodoulou, A., Harskamp, M. V., Knippels, M. C. P., Kyza, E. A., Levinson, R., & Agesilaou, A. (2021). Socio-scientific inquiry-based learning as a means toward environmental citizenship. Sustainability, 13(20), 1-22.
|
35 |
Barelli, E. (2017). Science of complex systems and future-scaffolding skills: A pilot study with secondary school students. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Bologna, Italy.
|
36 |
Barnett, R.(2007). A will to learn: Being a student in an age of uncertainty. Berkshire, England: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
|
37 |
Tasquier, G., Branchetti, L., & Levrini, O. (2019). Frantic standstill and lack of future: How can science education take care of students' distopic perceptions of time?. In E. McLoughlin, O. E. Finlayson, S. Erduran, & P. E. Childs (Eds.), Bridging research and practice in science education (pp. 205-224). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
|
38 |
Wals, A. E., Tassone, V. C., Hampson, G. P., & Reams, J. (2015). Learning for walking the change: Eco-social innovation through sustainability-oriented higher education. In M. Barth, G. Michelsen, M. Rieckmann, & I. Thomas (Eds.), Routledge handbook of higher education for sustainable development (pp. 25-39). London, England: Routledge.
|
39 |
Yoon, J., Cho, W., & Nam, Y. (2021). Gifted students' perception of the social roles and responsibilities of scientists. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 31(3), 383-404.
DOI
|
40 |
Bencze, L. (2017). Science and technology education promoting wellbeing for individuals, societies and environments: STEPWISE. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
|
41 |
Bielefeldt, A. R. (2018). Professional social responsibility in engineering. In I. Muenstermann (Ed.), Social responsibility (pp. 41-60). London, England: IntechOpen.
|
42 |
Canney, N. E., & Bielefeldt, A. R. (2016). Validity and reliability evidence of the engineering professional responsibility assessment tool. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(3), 452-477.
DOI
|