1 |
Capkinoglu, E., Cetin, P. S., & Peten, D. M. (2021). How do pre-service science teachers evaluate persuasiveness of a socioscientific argument? International Journal of Science Education, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1876273
DOI
|
2 |
Choe, I. (2005). A comparative study on modelling readability formulas: Focus on primary and secondary textbooks. Journal of the Korean Society for information Management, 22(4), 173-195.
DOI
|
3 |
Christenson, N., Rundgren, S. N., & Zeidler, D. L. (2014). The relationship of discipline background to upper secondary students' argumentation on socioscientific issues. Research in Science Education, 44(4), 581-601.
DOI
|
4 |
Dani, D., Wan, G., & Henning, J. E. (2010). A case for media literacy in the context of socioscientific issues. New Horizons in Education, 58(3), 85-98.
|
5 |
Evagorou, M. (2011). Discussing a socioscientific issue in a primary school classroom: The case of using a technology-supported environment in formal and nonformal settings. In T. D. Sadler (Ed.), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning, and research (pp. 133-159). The Netherlands: Springer.
|
6 |
Ratcliffe, M. (1997). Pupil decision-making about socio-scientific issues within the science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 167-182.
DOI
|
7 |
Song, H., Kim W, W., & Cho, H. (2005). A study on audience's awareness about the media reports of science technology risk: Focused on the genetically modified organism(GMO) case. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 49(3), 105-128.
|
8 |
Raveendran, A., & Chunawala, S. (2015). Values in science: Making sense of biology doctoral students' critical examination of a deterministic claim in a media article. Science Education, 99(4), 669-695.
DOI
|
9 |
Rundgren, S. N. C., & Rundgren, C. J. (2010). SEE-SEP: From a separate to a holistic view of socioscientific issues. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning & Teaching, 11(1), 1-24.
|
10 |
Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536.
DOI
|
11 |
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In Y. S. Lincoln & N. K. Denzin (Eds), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273-285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
|
12 |
Werner da Rosa, C., & Otero, J. (2018). Influence of source credibility on students' noticing and assessing comprehension obstacles in science texts. International Journal of Science Education, 40(13), 1653-1668.
DOI
|
13 |
Witzig, S. B., Halverson, K. L., Siegel, M. A., & Freyermuth, S. K. (2013). The interface of opinion, understanding and evaluation while learning about a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 35(15), 2483-2507.
DOI
|
14 |
Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2007). High school students' informal reasoning on a socio-scientific issue: Qualitative and quantitative analyses. International Journal of Science Education, 29(9), 1163-1187.
DOI
|
15 |
Oliveras, B., Marquez, C., & Sanmarti, N. (2014). Students' attitudes to information in the press: Critical reading of a newspaper article with scientific content. Research in Science Education, 44(4), 603-626.
DOI
|
16 |
Kim, Y., & Ahn, J. (2019). Factors influencing internet media credibility among college students. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 19(2), 438-449.
DOI
|
17 |
Kolsto, S. D., Bungum, B., Arnesen, E., Isnes, A., Kristensen, T., Mathiassen, K., Mestad, I., Quale, A., Tonning, A. S. V., & Ulvik, M. (2006). Science students' critical examination of scientific information related to socioscientific issues. Science Education, 90(4), 632-655.
DOI
|
18 |
McClune, B., & Jarman, R. (2012). Encouraging and equipping students to engage critically with science in the news: What can we learn from the literature? Studies in Science Education, 48(1), 1-49.
DOI
|
19 |
Yang, F. Y., Chen, Y. H., & Tsai, M. J. (2013). How university students evaluate online information about a socio-scientific issue and the relationship with their epistemic beliefs. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(3), 385-399.
|
20 |
Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49-58.
DOI
|
21 |
Zimmerman, C., Bisanz, G. L., Bisanz, J., Klein, J. S., & Klein, P. (2001). Science at the supermarket: A comparison of what appears in the popular press, experts' advice to readers, and what students want to know. Public Understanding of Science, 10(1), 37-58.
DOI
|
22 |
Miller, J. D. (2006). Civic scientific literacy in Europe and the United States. Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the World Association for Public Opinion Research, Montreal, Canada.
|
23 |
Xiao, S., & Sandoval, W. A. (2017). Associations between attitudes towards science and children's evaluation of information about socioscientific issues. Science & Education, 26(3-4), 247-269.
DOI
|
24 |
Lee, E., & Kang, N. (2014). Middle school students' evaluation of scientific information: From the perspective of hypothetico-deductive Reasoning. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(4), 375-383.
DOI
|
25 |
Leung, J. S. C., Wong, A. S. L., & Yung, B. H. W. (2015). Understandings of nature of science and multiple perspective evaluation of science news by non-science majors. Science & Education, 24(7-8), 887-912.
DOI
|
26 |
Leung, J. S. C., Wong, A. S. L., & Yung, B. H. W. (2017). Evaluation of science in the media by non-science majors. International Journal of Science Education(Part B), 7(3), 219-236.
|
27 |
Lin, S. S. (2014). Science and non-science undergraduate students' critical thinking and argumentation performance in reading a science news report. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(5), 1023-1046.
DOI
|
28 |
Phillips, L. M., & Norris, S. P. (1999). Interpreting popular reports of science: What happens when the reader's world meets the world on paper? International Journal of Science Education, 21(3), 317-327.
DOI
|
29 |
Mun, J., Kim, E., & Kim, S. (2017). College students' evaluation of scientific information: Focusing on the trustworthiness of information. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 17, 143-165.
DOI
|
30 |
Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (1994). Interpreting pragmatic meaning when reading popular reports of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 947-967.
DOI
|
31 |
Ko, Y. (2017). Comparison of college students' dialogic argumentation in the context of socioscientific issues: Based on idiocentrism and allocentrism. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
|
32 |
Kolsto, S. D. (2006). Patterns in students' argumentation confronted with a risk-focused socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 28(14), 1689-1716.
DOI
|
33 |
Hogan, K., & Maglienti, M. (2001). Comparing the epistemological underpinnings of students' and scientists' reasoning about conclusions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 663-687.
DOI
|
34 |
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Puig, B. (2012). Argumentation, evidence evaluation and critical thinking. In B. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1001-1015). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
|
35 |
Tseng, A. S. (2018). Students and evaluation of web-based misinformation about vaccination: Critical reading or passive acceptance of claims? International Journal of Science Education(Part B), 8(3), 250-265.
|
36 |
Kwon, H., & Choi, H. (2013). Effect of epistemological beliefs on dependency on the source authority in terms of evaluating persuasiveness of scientific explanation. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 27(1), 181-200.
|
37 |
Lee, E. (2011). Perceived bias or biased perception? Effects of others' comments, perceived opinion climate, and issue involvement on perceived news slant. Korean Journal of Journalism & Communication Studies, 55(3), 179-198.
|
38 |
Kolsto, S. D. (2001). 'To trust or not to trust,... '-pupils' ways of judging information encountered in a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 23(9), 877-901.
DOI
|