Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2020.40.6.657

Development of Data-Driven Science Inquiry Model and Strategy for Cultivating Knowledge-Information-Processing Competency  

Son, Mihyun (Center for Educational Research, Seoul National University)
Jeong, Daehong (Center for Educational Research, Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.40, no.6, 2020 , pp. 657-670 More about this Journal
Abstract
The knowledge-information-processing competency is the most essential competency in a knowledge-information-based society and is the most fundamental competency in the new problem-solving ability. Data-driven science inquiry, which emphasizes how to find and solve problems using vast amounts of data and information, is a way to cultivate the problem-solving ability in a knowledge-information-based society. Therefore, this study aims to develop a teaching-learning model and strategy for data-driven science inquiry and to verify the validity of the model in terms of knowledge information processing competency. This study is developmental research. Based on literature, the initial model and strategy were developed, and the final model and teaching strategy were completed by securing external validity through on-site application and internal validity through expert advice. The development principle of the inquiry model is the literature study on science inquiry, data science, and a statistical problem-solving model based on resource-based learning theory, which is known to be effective for the knowledge-information-processing competency and critical thinking. This model is titled "Exploratory Scientific Data Analysis" The model consisted of selecting tools, collecting and analyzing data, finding problems and exploring problems. The teaching strategy is composed of seven principles necessary for each stage of the model, and is divided into instructional strategies and guidelines for environment composition. The development of the ESDA inquiry model and teaching strategy is not easy to generalize to the whole school level because the sample was not large, and research was qualitative. While this study has a limitation that a quantitative study over large number of students could not be carried out, it has significance that practical model and strategy was developed by approaching the knowledge-information-processing competency with respect of science inquiry.
Keywords
Data-driven Science Inquiry; ESDA inquiry model; Knowledge-information-processi ng competency; Data literacy;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 9  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kim, S. (2015). Design Education based on STEAM Theory and Visual Thinking - focus on design program of Cooper-Hewitt National Design Museum. Korea Design Forum, 48, 59-70.
2 Kim, S., & Kang, S. (2016). Data science leading the 4th industrial revolution. Industrial Engineering Magazine 23(3), 9-13.
3 Kim, S., Jeoung, J., & Chun, J. (2010). Development and Application of Evaluation Criteria for Free Inquiry Activity Reports of Elementary School Students. Journal of Korean elementary science education, 29(1), 69-85.
4 Kim, T., Bae, D., & Kim, B. (2002). The Relationships of Graphing Abilities to Logical Thinking and Science Process Skills of Middle School Students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 22(4), 725-739.
5 King, A. (1992). Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and notetaking-review as strategies for learning from lectures. American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 303-323.   DOI
6 Klucevsek, K. M. (2017). The intersection of information and science literacy. Communications in Information Literacy, 11(2), 7.   DOI
7 Ku, J. (2006). Development and application of earth science inquiry learning material and homepage using on-line real-time data. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education
8 Kwak, S. (2005). Problem-Solving Model to Improve Scientific Literacy of Youth. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 36(3), 21-38.
9 Kwon, Y., Kim, W., Lee, H., Byeon, J., & Lee, I. (2011). Analysis of Biology Teachers' Systems Thinking about Ecosystem. Biology Education, 39(4), 529-543.   DOI
10 Lawson, A. E. (1995). Science teaching and the development of thinking. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
11 Leckie, G. J., & Fullerton, A. (1999). Information literacy in science and engineering undergraduate education: faculty attitudes and pedagogical practices. College and Research Libraries, 60(1), 9-29.   DOI
12 Majetic, C., & Pellegrino, C. (2014). When science and information literacy meet: an approach to exploring the sources of science news with non-science majors. College teaching, 62(3), 107-112.   DOI
13 Moore, D. S., Notz, W. I., & Notz, W. (2006). Statistics: Concepts and controversies. Macmillan.
14 Neumann, D. L., Hood, M., and Neumann, M. M. (2013). Using real-life data when teaching statistics: student perceptions of this strategy in an introductory statistics course. Statistics Education Research Journal, 12(2), 59-70.
15 NRC(National Research Council) (1996). National science education standards, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
16 Krumhansl, R., Peach, C., Foster, J., Busey, A., & Baker, I. (2012). Visualizing oceans of data: Educational interface design. Waltham, MA: Education Development Center, Inc.
17 NRC(National Research Council) (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. National Academies Press.
18 NRC(National Research Council) (2006). Guidelines for the Humane Transportation of Research Animals. Washington DC: National Academies Press.
19 Qin, J., & D'Ignazio, J. (2010a). Lessons learned from a two-year experience in science data literacy education. In Proceedings the 31st Annual IATUL Conference https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/iatul2010/conf/day2/5/.
20 Qin, J., & D'Ignazio, J. (2010b). Teaching Metadata as a Key Ingredient in Developing Science Data Literacy. Journal of Library Metadata, 10(2-3), 188-204.   DOI
21 Rakes, G. C. (1996). Using the Internet as a Tool in a Resource-Based Leatning Environment. Education Edchnology, 36(5), 52-56.
22 Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2007). Design and development research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
23 Robinson, W. R. (2004). The inquiry wheel, an alternative to the scientific method. Journal of Chemical Education, 81(6), 791.   DOI
24 Rubio, D. M., Berg-Weger, M., Tebb, S. S., Lee, E., & Rauch, S. (2003). Objectifying content validity: Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Social Work Research, 27(2), 94-104.   DOI
25 Saltz, J., & Heckman, R. (2016). Big Data science education: A case study of a project-focused introductory course. Themes in science and technology education, 8(2), 85-94.
26 Seo, W., & Ahn, S. (2019). Development And Applying Detailed Competencies For Elementary School Students' Data Collection, Analysis, and Representation. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 23(2), 131-139.   DOI
27 Schield, M. (2004). Information literacy, statistical literacy, data literacy. Iassist Quarterly (IQ), 28(2-3), 6-11.   DOI
28 Schuff, D. (2018). Data science for all: a university-wide course in data literacy. In A. Deokar, A. Gupta, L. Iyer, M. Jones(Eds). Analytics and Data Science. Annals of Information Systems. Springer, Cham. pp. 281-297.
29 Shim, H., & Ryu, S. (2018). Pre Service Chemistry Teachers' Understanding of Science Practices During Open-inquiry Chemistry Laboratory Activities. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 62(1), 52-63.   DOI
30 Son, M., & Jeong, D. (2018). A Study of Science Teachers' Perception on Knowledge Information Processing Competency. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(5), 693-703.   DOI
31 Son, M., Jeong, D., & Son, J. (2018). Analysis of Middle School Students' Difficulties in Science Inquiry Activity in View of Knowledge and Information Processing Competence. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(3), 441-449.   DOI
32 Songer, N. B., Lee, H. S., & McDonald, S. (2003). Research towards an expanded understanding of inquiry science beyond one idealized standard. Science Education, 87(4), 490-516.   DOI
33 Stepien, W. J., Senn, P. R., & Stepien, W. C. (2000). The Internet and problem-based learning: Developing solutions through the web for grades 6-12. Tucson, AZ: Zephyr Press.
34 Tairab, H. H., & Khalaf Al-Naqbi, A. K. (2004). How do secondary school science students interpret and construct scientific graphs?. Journal of Biological Education, 38(3), 127-132.   DOI
35 Tyner, K. (2014). Literacy in a digital world: Teaching and learning in the age of information. Routledge.
36 Ucar, S., & Trundle, K. C. (2011). Conducting guided inquiry in science classes using authentic, archived, web-based data. Computers and Education, 57(2), 1571-1582.   DOI
37 Vahey, P., Rafanan, K., Patton, C., Swan, K., Van't Hooft, M., Kratcoski, A., & Stanford, T. (2012). A cross-disciplinary approach to teaching data literacy and proportionality. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81(2), 179-205.   DOI
38 Wu, H. K., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2001). Promoting understanding of chemical representations: Students' use of a visualization tool in the classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 38(7), 821-842.   DOI
39 Wyner, Y. (2013). A case study: Using authentic scientific data for teaching and learning of ecology. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 54-60.
40 AAAS(American Association for the Advancement of Science) (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
41 Adams, M. D., DeLuca, P. F., Corr, D., & Kanaroglou, P. S. (2012). Mobile air monitoring: Measuring change in air quality in the city of Hamilton, 2005-2010. Social indicators research, 108(2), 351-364.   DOI
42 ALS(American Library Association) (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. http://www.ala.org/acrl/ilstandardlo.html.
43 Arends, R. I. (1998). Learning to teach(4th ed). Boston: McGraw Hill
44 Barker, L. J. (2009). Science teachers' use of online resources and the digital library for Earth system education. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries ACM. pp. 1-10.
45 Brogan, D. S., McDonald, W. M., Lohani, V. K., Dymond, R. L., & Bradner, A. J. (2016). Development and Classroom Implementation of an Environmental Data Creation and Sharing Tool. Advances in Engineering Education, 5(2), 1-34.
46 Behrens, S. J. (1994). A conceptual analysis and historical overview of information literacy. College & Research Libraries. April, 309-322.
47 Bell, R. L., Blair, L. M., Crowford, B. A. & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school studentes' understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 487-509.   DOI
48 Brickman, P., Gormally, C., Francom, G., Jardeleza, S. E., Schutte, V. G., Jordan, C., & Kanizay, L. (2012). Media-savvy scientific literacy: Developing critical evaluation skills by investigating scientific claims. The american biology Teacher, 74(6), 374-379.   DOI
49 Brown, C., & Krumholz, L. R. (2002). Integrating information literacy into the science curriculum. College and Research Libraries, 63(2), 111-123.   DOI
50 Butler, S. M., & McMunn, N. D. (2006). A Teacher's Guide to Classroom Assessment: Understanding and Using Assessment to Improve Student Learning. Greensboro, NC:Jossey-Bass.
51 Carlson, J., Fosmire, M., Miller, C. C., & Nelson, M. S. (2011). Determining data information literacy needs: A study of students and research faculty. Libraries and the Academy, 11(2), 629-657.   DOI
52 Ceccucci, W., Tamarkin, D. & Jones, K. (2015). The Effectiveness of Data Science as a means to achieve Proficiency in Scientific Literacy. Information Systems Education Journal, 13(4), 64-70.
53 Chang, B., Wang, H. Y., & Lin, Y. S. (2009). Enhancement of mobile learning using wireless sensor network. IEEE Learning Technology Newsletter, 11(1-2), 22-25.
54 Cook, M. P. (2006). Visual representations in science education: The influence of prior knowledge and cognitive load theory on instructional design principles. Science Education, 90(6), 1-19.   DOI
55 Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative research. Sage Publications Ltd, London.
56 Cho, W., & Sung, K. (2009). Social Studies Education in knowledgeinformation-based Society: Change of Education and Curricular Orientations. Theory and Research in Citizenship Education, 41(1), 167-188.   DOI
57 Cobb, P., & McClain, K. (2004). Principles of instructional design for supporting the development of students' statistical reasoning. In D. Ben-Zvi & J. Garfield (Eds), The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking. Springer, Dordrecht. pp. 375-395.
58 Cook, J., Bedford, D., & Mandia, S. (2014). Raising climate literacy through addressing misinformation: Case studies in agnotology-based learning. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62(3), 296-306.   DOI
59 Deluca, V. W., & Lari, N. (2011). The GRID C Project: Developing Students' Thinking Skills in a Data-Rich Environment. Journal of Technology Education, 23(1), 5-18.
60 Doering, A., & Veletsianos, G. (2008). An investigation of the use of real-time, authentic geospatial data in the K-12 classroom. Journal of Geography, 106(6), 217-225.   DOI
61 Drier, H. S., Dawson, K. M., & Garofalo, J. (1999). Not your typical math class. Educational Leadership, 56(5), 21-25.
62 Eisenberg, M. B., & Berkowitz, R. E. (1988). Curriculum Initiative: An Agenda and Strategy for Library Media Programs. Norwood, New Jersey, Ablex.
63 Glaser, B. G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social problems, 12(4), 436-445.   DOI
64 Ellwein, A. L., Hartley, L. M., Donovan, S., & Billick, I. (2014). Using rich context and data exploration to improve engagement with climate data and data literacy: Bringing a field station into the college classroom. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62(4), 578-586   DOI
65 Erwin, Jr., and Robin, W. (2015). Data literacy: Real-world learning through problem-solving with data sets. American secondary education, 43(2), 18.
66 Gebre, E. H. (2018). Young adults' understanding and use of data: insights for fostering secondary school students' data literacy. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 18(4), 330-341.   DOI
67 Grant, J.S. & Davis, L. (1997). Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Researchin Nursing and Health, 20(3), 269-274.   DOI
68 Griffis, K., Thadani, V., & Wise, J. (2008). Making authentic data accessible: The sensing the environment inquiry module. Journal of Biological Education, 42(3), 119-122.   DOI
69 Hakkarainen, K., & Sintonen, M. (2002). The interrogative model of inquiry and computer-supported collaborative learning. Science and Education, 11(1), 25-43.   DOI
70 Han, E. (2002). A Study on the Social Constructivist Teaching-Learning Model in the Early Childhood Education. Journal of Young Child Studies, 5, 49-63.
71 Hancock, C., Kaput, J. J., & Goldsmith, L. T. (1992). Authentic inquiry with data: Critical barriers to classroom implementation. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 337-364.   DOI
72 Hannafin, M. J., Hill, J. R., & Land, S. M. (1997). Student-centered learning and interactive multimedia: Status, issues, and implication. Contemporary Education, 68(2), 94.
73 Hwang, H. (2002). Teaching-Learning Methodology for development of student's performance ability in art.. Art Education Research Review. 15, 205-235.
74 Hoskins, S. G., & Stevens, L. M. (2009). Learning our LIMITS: less is more in teaching science. Advances in Physiology Education, 33(1), 17-20.   DOI
75 Hotaling, L., Lowes, S., Stolkin, R., Lin, P., Bonner, J., Kirkey, W., & Ojo, T. (2012). SENSE IT : Teaching STEM principles to middle and high school students through the design, construction and deployment of water quality sensors. Advances in Engineering Education, 3(2), 1-34.
76 Hulsizer, M. R., & Woolf, L. M. (2009). A guide to teaching statistics: Innovations and best practices (Vol. 10). John Wiley and Sons.
77 Iqbal, M. Z., & Chowdhury, S. H. (2007). Using on-campus monitoring wells to enhance student learning in geo-hydrology courses. Journal of Geoscience Education, 55(5), 364-370.   DOI
78 Jung, W., Lee, J., Oh, S (2011). Investigation on the Difficulties During Middle School Students' Finding Inquiry Topics on Open-Inquiry Activities. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(8), 1199-1213.   DOI
79 Jonassen, D. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed), Instructional Theories and Models(2nd ed). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate. pp. 215-239.
80 Jhun, Y., & Park, J. (2006). An analysis of the science high-school students' readiness to perform open inquiry tasks in physics, New Physics: Sae Mulli, 52(4), 345-355.
81 Kim, J. (2016). Hello Data Science. Seoul: Hanbitmedia.
82 Kim, J., & Lee, W. (2014). Controversial Issues in Knowledge and Problem Solving Skills of Information Subjects Observed after Amending the Curriculum in the U.K. The Journal of Korean association of computer education, 17(3), 54-64.
83 Kim, K. (2012). Development of social studies lesson for creativity and character education focused on key competencies: problem-solving based on empathic activity. Social studies education, 51(3), 87-101.
84 Kang, M., (2009). How to Use the Computer in Order to Develop the Mathematical Thinking. Science Education Center Inchon National University of Education, 22(1), 37-54.
85 Kim, Y. (2018). Data science education program to improve computational thinking and creativity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation in Jeju National University.
86 Kim, S. (2012). Developing Experimental Method of Real-time Data Transfer and Imaging using Astronomical Observations for Scientific Inquiry Activities. Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 33(2), 183-199.   DOI