Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2020.40.6.631

'Neonadeuri' of 'Unripe' and 'Ripe': Science Learning as Heterogeneous Network  

Joung, Yong Jae (Gongju National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.40, no.6, 2020 , pp. 631-648 More about this Journal
Abstract
As an attempt to consider what to pay attention to in science learning, this study was conducted with the aim of discussing the meaning of science learning as a heterogeneous network. As a result of theoretical investigation, the characteristics of the heterogeneous network were described in three aspects: heterogeneous composition, existence by relations, and construction and change by translation. And it was discussed that science learning also has these characteristics of heterogeneous network. Relating to what to pay attention to in science learning, it was also discussed that science learning as a heterogeneous network requires us to pay attention to the elevation of things, the concept as a punctualized heterogeneous network, and the construction and expansion of heterogeneous network with neonadeuri of 'unripe' and 'ripe'. Finally, several suggestions for the science learning were given.
Keywords
heterogeneous network; Actor-Network Theory (ANT); science learning; neonadeuri of unripe and ripe;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 10  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Blok, A. & Jensen, T. E. (2011). Bruno Latour: Hybrid thoughts in a hybrid world. London: Routledge.
2 Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3 Callon, M.(1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fisherman of St. Brieuc's Bay. In J. Law (ed.). Power, Action and Belief: a New Sociology of Knowledge? (pp. 196-233). London: Routledge.
4 Callon, M. (1991). Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In J. Law (Ed.) A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 132-161). London: Routledge.
5 Callon, M., & Law, J. (1997). After the individual in society: Lessons on collectivity from science, technology and society. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 22(2), 165-182.   DOI
6 Carroll, M. (2018). Understanding curriculum: An Actor Network Theory approach. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 9(3), 247-261.   DOI
7 Cole, H., & Raven, R. (1969). Principle learning as a function of instruction on excluding irrelevant variables. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 6(3), 234-241.   DOI
8 Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
9 Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York: Henry Holt and Company.
10 Dong, P. I. (2019). Diverse and complicated networks that digital pictures construct in early childhood classrooms: Focusing on Actor-Network Theory. The Journal of Anthropology of Education, 22(3), 173-198.   DOI
11 Driver, R. (1983). The pupils as scientist? Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
12 Elam, M., Solli, A., & Makitalo, A. (2019). Socioscientific issues via controversy mapping: Bringing actor-network theory into the science classroom with digital technology. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 40(1), 61-77.   DOI
13 Fenwick, T., & Edwards, R. (2010). Actor-network theory in education. London: Routledge.
14 Gilbert, J. K., & Watts, D. M.(1983). Concepts, misconception and alternative conceptions: Changing perspectives in science education, Studies in Science Education, 10, 61-98.   DOI
15 Ha, H., & Kim, H. -B., (2019). A theoretical investigation on agency to facilitate the understanding of student-centered learning communities in science classrooms. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(1), 101-113.   DOI
16 Hong, S. (2010). Understaing ANT with 7 thesis. In S. Hong (Ed.). Human.Things.Alliance: Actor-Network Theory and technoscience [7가지 테제로 이해하는 ANT. 홍성욱 편, 인간.사물.동맹: 행위자네트워크 이론과 테크노사이언스] (pp. 15-35). Seoul: Eum.
17 Joung, Y. J. (2009). Children's Typically-Perceived-Situations of floating and sinking. International Journal of Science Education, 31(1), 101-127.   DOI
18 Joung, Y. J., & Gunstone, R. (2010). Children's Typically-Perceived-Situations of force and no force in the context of Australia and Korea. International Journal of Science Education, 32(12), 1959-1615.   DOI
19 Joung, Y. J, (2014). Theoretical investigation on the implications of the 'Community of Inquiry' for science education: Toward 'Community of Inquiry in Science Classroom'. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(3), 303-319.   DOI
20 Joung, Y. J. (2018). Community of inquiry in science classroom [과학교실탐구공동체]. Seoul: Bookshill.
21 Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: the construction of scientific knowledge. NJ: Princeton University Press.
22 Joung, Y. J, (2020). Exploring the implications of heterogeneous network perspectives on teaching practicum, Teaching Practicum Research, 2(1), 1-12.   DOI
23 Kim, H. -S. (2011). Technoscience and democracy from the perspective of ANT. Journal of Korean Social Trend and Perspective, 83, 11-46.
24 Komatsu, L.K. (1992). Recent views of conceptual structure. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 500-526.   DOI
25 Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26 Latour, B. (1988). The Pasteurization of France. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27 Latour, B. (1989). The moral dilemmas of a safety belt (trans. L Davis). Retrived from: https://courses.ischool.berkeley.edu/i290-tpl/s11/w/images/6/69/The_Moral_Dilemmas_of_a_Safety-belt.pdf.
28 Latour, B. (1991). Technology is society made durable. In J. Law (Ed.). A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination (103-31), London: Routledge.
29 Latour, B. (1993). We have never been modern, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30 Latour, B. (1996). On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale Welt, 47, 369-381.
31 Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32 Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33 Lee, S., Kim, C. -J., Choe, S. U., Yoo, J., Park, H., Kang, E., & Kim, H. -B. (2012). Exploring the patterns of group model development about blood flow in the heart and reasoning process by small group interaction. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(5), 805-822.   DOI
34 Law, J. (1992). Notes on the theory of the Actor-Netwok: Odering, strategy and heterogeneity, Systems Practice, 5(4), 379-393.   DOI
35 Law, J. (2009). Actor Network Theory and material semiotics. In B. S. Turner (Ed). The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory (141-158). West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
36 Lee, M., & Kim, H. -B. (2019). Key stages of a research and students' epistemic agency in a student-driven R&E. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(4), 511-523.
37 Lee, S. S. (2012). New directions in educational innovation as a response to the networked society. Teacher Education Research, 51(2), 282-296.   DOI
38 Mattozzi, A. (2019), What can ANT still learn from semiotics? In A. Blok, I. Farias, & C. Roberts (Eds.). The Routledge Companion to Actor-Network Theory Routledge (pp. 87-100). London: Routledge.
39 Medin, D. L. (1989). Concepts and conceptual structure. American Psychologist, 44(12), 1469-1481.   DOI
40 Latour, B. (1999). Pandora's hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university press.
41 Medin, D. L., & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 86, 207-238.   DOI
42 Medin, D. L., & Shoben, E. J. (1988). Context and structure in conceptual combination. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 158-190.   DOI
43 Ministry of Education (2015). The 2015 revised science curriculum.
44 Paledi, V. N., & Alexander, P. M. (2017). Actor‐Network Theory to depict context‐sensitive m‐learning readiness in higher education. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 83(1), 1-26.   DOI
45 Mol, A. (2010). Actor-network theory: Sensitive terms and enduring tensions. Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, Sonderheft, 50, 253-269.
46 National Institute of Korean Language (2020). Standard Korean language dictionary. Retrieved from: https://stdict.korean.go.kr/search/
47 Oh, E. -K. (2010). Consilience or heterogeneous networks: An analysis of communication structure for the interdisciplinary studies. Sogang Humanities Journal, 29, 265-301.
48 Park, H. -Y. (2019a). Ontological understanding of posthuman learners and the paradigm shift of learning theories. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 31(1), 121-145.   DOI
49 Park, H. -Y. (2019b). Posthuman onto-epistemology and the transition of learner subjectivity. Philosophy of Education, 73, 81-119.
50 Park, H. -Y. (2020). Posthuman literacy: Its concept, categories, theoretical basis, and the directions of education. The Korean Journal of Literacy Research 11(1), 11-55.
51 Pellicano, E., Brett, S., den Houting, J., Heyworth, M., Magiati, I., Steward, R., Urbanowicz, A., & Stears, M. (2020). "I want to see my friends": The everyday experiences of autistic people and their families during COVID-19. Sydney, Australia.
52 Peirce, C. S. (1877). The fixation of belief. Popular Science Monthly, 12 (November 1877), 1-15. In C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (Eds.) Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 5 (1931-1958) (pp. 223-247). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1960.
53 Pickering, A. (1993). The mangle of practice: Agency and emergence in the sociology of science. American Journal of Sociology, 99(3), 559-589.   DOI
54 Peirce, C. S. (1878). Deduction, induction, and hypothesis. Popular Science Monthly, 13, 470-482. In C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (Eds.) Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 2 (1931-1958) (pp. 372-388). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1960.
55 Pierce, C. (2015). Learning about a fish from an ANT: Actor network theory and science education in the postgenomic era. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(1), 83-107.   DOI
56 Piaget, J., & Cook, M. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.
57 Roehl, T. (2012). From witnessing to recording-material objects and the epistemic configuration of science classes. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 20(1), 49-70.   DOI
58 Rosch, E., & Marvis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblance: Studies in the internal structure of categories, Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605.   DOI
59 Roth, W.-M., McGinn, M. K., Woszczyna, C., & Boutonne, S. (1999). Differential participation during science conversations: The interaction of focal artifacts, social configurations, and physical arrangements. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3&4), 293-347.   DOI
60 Ryu, J. -H., Choi, Y. -M., Kim, R. -H., & You, Y. -M. (2016). An Inquiry into the Identity of Educational Technology, Journal of Educational Technology, 32(1), 1-27.   DOI
61 Sayes, E. (2014). Actor-Network Theory and methodology: Just what does it mean to say that nonhumans have agency? Social Studies of Science, 44(1), 134-149.   DOI
62 Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1982). Conceptual change and science teaching. European Journal of Science Education, 4(3), 231-240.   DOI
63 Shin, S., Ha, M., & Lee, J. -K. (2020). Images of decomposition of hydrogen peroxide demonstration represented in new media contents: Focusing on simulacra and simulation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 40(1), 13-28.
64 Smith, E. (1989). Concepts and induction. In M. Posner (Ed.). Foundations of cognitive science (pp. 501-526). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
65 Song, J., Kang, S.-J., Kwak, Y., Kim, D., Kim, S., Na, J., Do, J.-H., Min, B., Park, S. C., Bae, S., Son, Y.-A, Son, J. W., Oh, P. S., Lee, J.-K., Lee, H. J., Ihm, H., Jeong, D. H., Jung, J. H., Kim, J., & Joung, Y. J. (2019). Contents and features of 'Korean Science Education Standards (KSES)' for the next generation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 39(3), 465-478,   DOI
66 Yoon, M., & Kwon, J. (2013). Creative value connection and hyper connected society [창조적 가치연결, 초연결사회의 도래]. IT & Future Strategy, 10, 1-39.
67 Way, W. C. (1997). Connectionism and conceptual structure. American Behavioral Scientist, 40(6), 729-753.   DOI
68 Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations (G. E. M. Anscombe, trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.
69 Seong, T. (2017). Suggestions for the human character and education in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 55(2), 1-21.