Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2020.40.6.595

Analysis of the Experiences and Perceptions of Teachers Participating in the Development of Content-Based Online Science Class Videos, and the Characteristics of the Developed Class Content  

Shin, Jung Yun (Daejeon Baeul Elementary School)
Park, Sang Hee (Daejeon GwanPyeong Elementary School)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.40, no.6, 2020 , pp. 595-609 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the experiences of teachers who participated in the development of online science class videos in the context of covid-19, their perception of online science class, and the characteristics of the online science class content developed by teachers. A survey and interviews were conducted with ten elementary school teachers who made online science class videos themselves. Also the characteristics of the online science class were investigated by analyzing the online science class video produced by the participants. As a result, participants in the study recognized the lack of production time, difficulty in filming and editing, concerns over misconceptions, the problem of solving copyrights for existing materials, and the burden of external disclosure. Although it was a teacher who had experience producing online science class video contents, no research participants actively answered the merits of online science class. On the other hand, the study participants cited that the shortcomings of online science classes were that students had fewer opportunities for inquiry and lack of communication or interaction. In particular, these shortcomings were thought to have a great influence on the quality of online science classes, especially in making inquiry classes difficult. Some teachers took a negative view that online science classes could not completely replace face-to-face classes. However, if multiple teachers are presented with supplementary teaching activities that complement the content-based online teaching method, the method of combining online science classes and face-to-face classes is not. Through the analysis of the contents of the online science class, the introduction and arrangement steps of the online science class were similar to the process of the face-to-face science class, but the inquiry step and the conceptual explanation step showed a big difference from the face-to-face science class.
Keywords
teacher experience; teacher perception; content-based online science class; online science class video production;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Rovai, A. P., & Wighting, M. J. (2005). Feelings of alienation and community among higher education students in a virtual classroom. The Internet and higher education, 8(2), 97-110.   DOI
2 Ryu, H., Lee, W., & Jang, N. H. (2005). Groping the design procedure of force-motion web courseware for studying middle school science II. Report of Science education, 36, 77-98.
3 Lim, B. (2003). Experiences of college students in online inquiry-based learning environment: Implications for design of inquiry on the web. Journal of Education Technology, 19(3), 69-99.   DOI
4 Shim, K., Park, J., & Yuk, K. (2001). A study on the development of a new learning method and program for the science gifted students on cyber environment. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 11(3), 69-84.
5 Shim, S. (2012). Relationship among the learning instrument, learning achievement, and learning satisfaction in online class. The Korea Contents Society, 12(3), 487-497.   DOI
6 Shim, S. (2013). Influence of learning instrument and self-regulated learning strategy on learning achievement in online learning. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 13(3), 456-467.   DOI
7 Sung, E., Jin, S. H., & Yoo, M. (2016). Exploring learning data for supporting self-directed learning in the perspective of learning analytics. Journal of Educational Technology, 32(3), 487-533.   DOI
8 Chae, Y., & Lee, S. (2015). An analysis of differences in motivation, self-regulation strategy use, leaning style preference among high, medium, low achievers in an online gifted program. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 25(6), 905-926.   DOI
9 Choi, K. A., & Lee, S. (2016). A relationship among facilitating discourse, students perceived challenge, and learning outcomes in an online science gifted education. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 26(3), 541-559.   DOI
10 Chao, I. T., Saj, T., & Hamilton, D. (2010). Using collaborative course development to achieve online course quality standards. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 11(3), 106-126.   DOI
11 Choi, K. A., Lee, S., & Chae, Y. (2016). A relationship among teaching presence, students' perceptions of class, and learning outcomes in an online science gifted education program. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 22(2), 381-408.
12 Do, J. (2020). An investigation of design constraints in the process of converting face-to-face course into online course. Journal of Education & culture, 26(2), 153-173.   DOI
13 Hong, K., & Oh, J. (2008). An analysis of learners' satisfaction and effectiveness awareness on jeollabuk-do cyber home study system. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 8(2), 423-447.
14 Jang, M. (2010). Preservice elementary teachers' understanding of children's science misconceptions. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(1), 32-46.
15 Jeong, Y. S., Park, J. P., & Jeong, S. W. (2012). A legal analysis on on-line instruction system of elementary and secondary schools. The Korean Association of Computer Education, 16(2), 109-115.
16 Jeong, Y., Koh, Y., Park, J., & Yim, J. (2003). Development and evaluation of distance learning for the gifted students in science and mathematics. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 13(3), 1-17.
17 Kim, S. (2020). Analysis of press articles in korean media on online education related to Covid-19. Journal of Digital Contents Society, 21(6), 1091-1100.   DOI
18 Jung, H., & Yoon, J. (2020). A survey research of student's perception of Korean language online video lecture. The Journal of Humanities and Social science, 11(3), 1305-1318.
19 Kang, H., Kim, M., & Noh, T. (2007). The influences of cognitive conflict and non-cognitive variables on conceptual change and the sources of situational interest induced by a discrepant event. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 27(1), 18-27.
20 Kim, I., & Cho, E. (2008). Inquiry based online contents development for elementary science class. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 8(12), 457-464.   DOI
21 Kwon, S. (2011). The investigation of the relationships among social presence, learners characteristics, perceived effects of discussion, perceived learning and satisfaction in online learning. The journal of Educational Studies, 42(3), 55-82.
22 Lee, S., & Choi, K. A. (2016). A relationship among middle school students' perception about learning task, challenge, deep learning, and achievement in a context of online mathematics and science gifted education program. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 16(1), 189-212.   DOI
23 Bae, Y., & Kho, D. (2008). A study on the effectiveness of the cyber home learning system. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, 12(3), 253-265.
24 Buxton, C. A. (2006). Creating contextually authentic science in a "low-performing" urban elementary school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(7), 695-721.   DOI
25 Bybee, R. W. (2006). Scientific inquiry and science teaching. In: FLICK; LEDREMAN. Scientific inquiry and nature of science. Implications for teaching, learning, and teacher education. Springer.
26 Lecompte, M. D., & Preissle, J. (1993). Ethnography and Qualitative Design in Educational Research, 2.
27 Lee, J., & Hong, C. E. (2009). Development and validation of teaching-learning model for cyber education of giftedness. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 19(1), 116-137.
28 Lee, Y., & Gwak, B. (2012). Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference, 20(2), 457-458.
29 Lyu, M. (2011). A case study on structure and possibility of online courses in physical education. Research Institute of Curriculum & Instruction, 15(2), 353-370.   DOI
30 McKinnon, D. H., & Nolan, C. P. (1999). Distance education for the gifted and talented: An interactive design model. Roeper Review, 21(4), 320.   DOI
31 Nam, S. (2006). An empirical study on students' problems of internet-based distance learning. Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 6(3), 102-107.
32 Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2008). Assessing the online learner: Resources and strategies for faculty (Vol. 7). John Wiley & Sons.
33 Park, K., & Kim, Y. M. (2019). The difference analysis of learning presence in online discussion learning based on e-learning. The e-Business Studies, 20(5), 95-109.   DOI
34 Park, S. H., & Joo, Y. J., & Bong, M. M. (2007). Investigation of the perceived effectiveness of and user satisfaction with the cyber home learning system. Journal of Education Technology, 23(3), 59-87.   DOI