Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2018.38.3.343

Analysis of the Scientific Research Process of a Participant in Undergraduate Research Program by Cultural Historical Activity Theory  

Lee, Jiwon (Korea National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.38, no.3, 2018 , pp. 343-354 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, the first experience of the whole research process of a novice scientist (student A) who participated in the Undergraduate Research Program (URP) was analyzed. The data were collected through observation, interviews, and document analysis with the cultural historical activity theory being used as a theoretical lens. At the beginning of novice's research, the mentor guided him in setting a research goal and provided mediating artifacts. Student A formed a research team based on the vertical relationship without a shared mental model. Two major contradictions occurred and they were the sources of changes of student A's activity system. The first contradiction was between the mentor's educational philosophy and the mentee's educational needs, which was resolved in a way that student A asked and used the mentor's network to obtain his needs about task-specific details. The second contradiction arose because the team members wanted horizontal relationship while student A wanted to stick to the vertical relationship. After student A accepted the opinions of the team members, they cooperatively changed the division of labor in the activity system. Student A decided to become a scientist and not a physics teacher, even if his major is physics education after finishing his URP research process. His URP experience also created and expanded his network in the academic field, and his negative attitude toward collaboration changed positively. Through the analysis of the structure and changes in the activity system of URP research, implications for instructional method and support system of the apprenticeship can be obtained.
Keywords
undergraduate research program; novice scientist; cultural historical activity theory; scientific research process; mentoring; gifted;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Converse, S., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1993). Shared mental models in expert team decision making. Individual and group decision making: Current issues, 221.
2 Chemers, M. M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Syed, M., Goza, B. K., & Bearman, S. (2011). The role of efficacy and identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority students. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 469-491.   DOI
3 Nagda, B. A., Gregerman, S. R., Jonides, J., von Hippel, W., & Lerner, J.S. (1998). Undergraduate student-faculty research partnerships affect student retention. The Review of Higher Education, 22(1), 55-72.   DOI
4 Paglis, L. L., Green, S. G., & Bauer, T. N. (2006). Does adviser mentoring add value? A longitudinal study of mentoring and doctoral student outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 47(4), 451-476.   DOI
5 Robnett, R. D., Chemers, M. M., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2015). Longitudinal associations among undergraduates’ research experience, self‐efficacy, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(6), 847-867.   DOI
6 Roth, W. M., Lee, Y. J., & Hsu, P. L. (2009). A tool for changing the world: possibilities of cultural‐historical activity theory to reinvigorate science education. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 131-167.   DOI
7 Sawchuk, P. H. (2003). Adult Learning and Technology in Working-Class Life. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8 Sawchuk, P., Duarte, N., & Elhammoumi, M. (Eds.). (2006). Critical perspectives on activity: Explorations across education, work, and everyday life. Cambridge University Press.
9 Slovacek, S., Whittinghill, J., Flenoury, L., & Wiseman, D. (2012). Promoting minority success in the sciences: The minority opportunities in research programs at CSULA. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(2), 199-217.   DOI
10 Thiry, H., Laursen, S. L., & Hunter, A. B. (2011). What experiences help students become scientists? A comparative study of research and other sources of personal and professional gains for STEM undergraduates. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(4), 357-388.
11 Villarejo, M., Barlow, A. E., Kogan, D., Veazey, B. D., & Sweeney, J. K. (2008). Encouraging minority undergraduates to choose science careers: career paths survey results. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 7(4), 394-409.   DOI
12 Johnson, W. B., Behling, L. L., Miller, P., & Vandermaas-Peeler, M. (2015). Undergraduate research mentoring: obstacles and opportunities. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 23(5), 441-453.   DOI
13 Kardash, C. M. (2000). Evaluation of undergraduate research experience: Perceptions of undergraduate interns and their faculty mentors. Journal of educational psychology, 92(1), 191.   DOI
14 Laursen, S., Hunter, A. B., Seymour, E., Thiry, H., & Melton, G. (2010). Undergraduate research in the sciences: Engaging students in real science. John Wiley & Sons.
15 Lee, G. H. (2009). An Educational Program of Undergraduate Research Participation in Science and Engineering Field. KAIST.
16 Lopatto, D. (2004). Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): First findings. Cell biology education, 3(4), 270-277.   DOI
17 Lopatto, D. (2007). Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6(4), 297-306.   DOI
18 Lovitts, B. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study. Rowman & Littlefield.
19 Lompscher, J. (2006). The cultural-historical activity theory. Critical perspectives on activity: Explorations across education, work, and everyday life, 35-51.
20 Lovitts, B. E. (2005). Being a good course‐taker is not enough: a theoretical perspective on the transition to independent research. Studies in higher education, 30(2), 137-154.   DOI
21 Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning. (2013). The master plan for the identifying and nurturing of the science gifted students. Gwacheon: Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning.
22 Dolan, E., & Johnson, D. (2009). Toward a holistic view of undergraduate research experiences: An exploratory study of impact on graduate/postdoctoral mentors. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(6), 487.   DOI
23 Engestrom, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsult.
24 Engestrom, Y. (2000). Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics, 43(7), 960-974.   DOI
25 Gardner, S. K. (2005). If it were easy, everyone would have a Ph. D. Doctoral student success: Socialization and disciplinary perspectives.
26 Engestrom, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of education and work, 14(1), 133-156.   DOI
27 Engestrom, Y. (2009). The future of activity theory: A rough draft. Learning and expanding with activity theory, 303-328.
28 Fletcher, J. K., & Ragins, B. R. (2007). Stone center relational cultural theory. The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, and practice, 373-399.
29 Gardner, S. K. (2008). “What’s too much and what’s too little?”: The process of becoming an independent researcher in doctoral education. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(3), 326-350.
30 Adedokun, O. A., Bessenbacher, A. B., Parker, L. C., Kirkham, L. L., & Burgess, W. D. (2013). Research skills and STEM undergraduate research students’ aspirations for research careers: Mediating effects of research self‐efficacy. Journal of Research in Science teaching, 50(8), 940-951.   DOI
31 Bargar, R. R., & Duncan, J. K. (1982). Cultivating creative endeavor in doctoral research. The Journal of Higher Education, 53(1), 1-31.   DOI
32 Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (2003). Research for education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon
33 Burgin, S. R., & Sadler, T. D. (2016). Learning nature of science concepts through a research apprenticeship program: A comparative study of three approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(1), 31-59.   DOI
34 Youn, C., & Park, S. (2012). Theoretical development of cultural historical activity theory and implications to lifelong education. Journal of Lifelong Education, 18(3), 113-139.
35 Hathaway, R. S., Nagda, B. A., & Gregerman, S. R. (2002). The relationship of undergraduate research participation to graduate and professional education pursuit: an empirical study. Journal of College Student Development, 43(5), 614-631.
36 Hunter, A. B., Laursen, S. L., & Seymour, E. (2007). Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development. Science education, 91(1), 36-74.   DOI