1 |
ITEA(International Technology Education Association). (2007). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: ITEA.
|
2 |
Jeanpierre, B., Oberhauser, K., & Freeman, C. (2005). Characteristics of professional development that effect change in secondary science teachers' classroom practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 668-690.
DOI
|
3 |
Kim, U. S. (1998). Information society and ethics: The nature of technology. Paper Presented in the 1st conference of the Korean Institute of Communication and Information Science, Seoul, Korea.
|
4 |
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
|
5 |
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359.
DOI
|
6 |
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science quesrionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497-521.
DOI
|
7 |
Lee, H. (2015). Construction of nature of technology framework and its utilization for investigation of changes in college students' perception of nature of technology through SSI-based program. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Ewha Womans University.
|
8 |
Lee, H., & Lee, H. (2015). Analysis of students' socioscientific decision-making from the nature of technology perspectives. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 35(1), 169-177.
DOI
|
9 |
Lee, H., & Lee, H. (2016). Contextualized nature of technology in socioscientific issues. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 36(2), 303-315.
DOI
|
10 |
Celik, S., & Bayrakceken, (2006). The effect of a "science, technology and society" course on perspective teachers' conceptions of the nature of science. Research in Science and Technological Education, 24(2), 255-273.
DOI
|
11 |
Chiappetta, E. L., & Fillman, D. A. (2007). Analysis of five high school biology textbooks used in the United States for inclusion of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 29(15), 1847-1868.
DOI
|
12 |
Chiappetta, E. L., Fillman, D. A., & Sethna, G. H. (1991). A method to quantify major themes of scientific literacy in science textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 713-725.
DOI
|
13 |
Choi, U. H. (2017). The Study of Technology Education. Heoung-Sul Press.
|
14 |
Choi, Y., & Rye, C. (2007), Analyzing preceding research on the concepts and elements of technological literacy. Korean Technology Education Association, 7(2), 141-153.
|
15 |
Choi, Y. & Ryu, C. (2007). Analyzing preceding research on the concepts and elementary of technological literacy. Korean Technology Education Association, 7(2), 141-153.
|
16 |
Collier-Reed, B. I. (2008). Pupils' Experiences of Technology: Exploring Dimensions of Technological Literacy. Saarbrucken: VDM Verlag Dr. Mueller e. K.
|
17 |
Confrey, J. (1990). A review of the research on student conceptions im mathematics, science, and programming. Review of Research in Education, 16, 3-56.
|
18 |
DiGironimo, N. (2011). What is technology? investigating student conceptions about the nature of technology. International Journal of Science Education, 33(10), 1337-1352.
DOI
|
19 |
Durbin, P. T. (2006). Philosophy of technology: In search of discourse synthesis. Techne, 10(2), 4-319.
|
20 |
Lee, H., & Lee, H. (2017). Developing and application of rubric for assessing nature of technology in the context of socioscientific issues. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 37(2), 323-334.
DOI
|
21 |
Lee, Y. H. (2013). A proposal of inclusive framework of the nature of science (NOS) based on the 4 themes of scientific literacy for K-12 school science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(3), 553-569.
DOI
|
22 |
Lee, Y. H. (2014a). Comparative analysis of the presentation of the nature of science(NOS) in Korea and US elementary science textbooks. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(3), 207-212.
DOI
|
23 |
Lee, Y. H. (2014b). What do scientists think about the nature of science?- exploring views of the nature of science of korean scientists related with life science area, Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(7), 677-691.
DOI
|
24 |
Liou, P. (2015). Developing an intrument for assessing students' concepts of the nature of technology. Research in Science & Technological Education, 33(2), 162-181.
DOI
|
25 |
Marianne, C. P., Vowell, J. E., Lee, Y. H., & Plankis, B. J. (2015). How do elementary science textbooks present the nature of science? The Educational Forum, 79, 148-162.
DOI
|
26 |
McGinn, R. E. (1991). Science, technology, and society. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
|
27 |
Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and Awareness. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
|
28 |
Meichtry, Y. J. (1992). Influencing student understanding of the nature of science: Data from a case of curriculum development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 29(4), 389-407.
DOI
|
29 |
Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. London: King's College London.
|
30 |
Mitcham, C. (1994). Thinking through technology: The path between engineering and philosophy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
|
31 |
Misa, T. J. (2009). History of technology. In J. K. B. Olsen, S. A. Pedersen, & V. F. Hendricks (Eds.), A companion to the philosophy of technology (pp. 7-17). West Sussex, UK: Blackwell.
|
32 |
Ministry of Education(MOE). (2015). Curriculum of High School Science Education, Seoul, Korea: Author.
|
33 |
Moon, S., Lee, Y. H., & Son, Y. A. (2015). Analysis of middle school environmental education textbooks using the environmental literacy based on the four themes of scientific literacy. The Korean Society of Environmental Education, 28(1), 1-14.
DOI
|
34 |
Moore, D. R. (2011). Technology literacy: The extension of cognition. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(2), 185-193.
DOI
|
35 |
National Research Council (NRC) (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
|
36 |
National Research Council (NRC) (2002). Technically speaking: Why all Americans needs to know more about technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Presss.
|
37 |
National Research Council (NRC) (2006). Tech tally: Approaches to assessing technological literacy. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
|
38 |
National Research Council (NRC) (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concept, and core idea. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press.
|
39 |
Layton, E. T. (1974). Technology as knowledge. Technology and Culture, 15(1), 31-41.
DOI
|
40 |
National Science Teachers Association [NSTA] (1982). Science- Technology-Society: Science Education for The 1980s (An NSTA Position Statement). Washington, DC: Author.
|
41 |
Rose, M. A. (2007). Perceptions of technological literacy among science, technology, engineering, and mathematics leaders. Journal of Technology Education, 19(1), 35-52.
|
42 |
Oldenziel, R. (2006). Signifying semantics for a history of technology. Technology and Culture, 47, 477-485.
DOI
|
43 |
Pearson, G., & Young, A. T. (2002). Technically speaking: Why all americans need to know more about technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
|
44 |
Pitt, J. C. (2000). Thinking about technology: Foundations of the philosophy of technology. New York: Seven Bridges Press.
|
45 |
Schatzberg, E. (2006). Technik comes to America: Changing meaning of technology before 1930. Technology and Culture, 47, 486-512.
DOI
|
46 |
Seo, D., Lee, Y. H., & Jho, H. (2017). Understanding of students at a technical high school about the nature of technology through the course of science and technology course. Biology Education, 45(1), 199-212.
|
47 |
Waight, N. (2014). Technology knowledge: high school science teachers' conceptions of the nature of technology. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(5), 1143-1168.
DOI
|
48 |
Smith, M. U., & Scharmann, L. C. (1999). Defining versus describing the nature of science: A pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science education. Science Education, 83, 493-509.
DOI
|
49 |
Synder, J. (2004). One world, rival theories, Foreign Policy, 145, 52-62.
|
50 |
Taylor, A. R., Jones, M.G., Broadwell, B., & Oppewal, T. (2008). Creativity, inquiry, or accountability? Scientists' and teachers' perceptions of science education. Science Education, 92(6), 1058-1075.
DOI
|
51 |
Zorlu, Y., Baykara, O., & Zorlu, F. (1993). The views of pre-service classroom teachers about nature of technology. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 3121-3132.
|
52 |
Waight, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Nature of technology: implications for design, development, and enactment of technological tools in school science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 34(18), 2875-2905.
DOI
|
53 |
Wright, R. T., Israel, R. N., & Lauda, D. P. (1993). Teaching technology: A teacher's guide. International Technology Education Association, Reston, VA.
|
54 |
Young, A. T., Cole, J. R., & Denton, D. (2002). Improving technological literacy: The first steps is understanding what is meant by 'Technology'. Issues in Science and Technology, 18(4), 73-79.
|
55 |
Freenberg, A. (1999). Questioning technology. New York: Routledge.
|
56 |
Duschl, R. (2000). Making the nature of science explicit. In R. Millar, J. Leach, & J. Osborne (Eds.), Improving science education: The contribution of research (pp. 187-206). Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
|
57 |
Fedock, P., Zambo, R., & Cobern, W. (1996). The professional development of college science professors as science teacher educators. Science Education, 80(1), 5-19.
DOI
|
58 |
Frank, M. (2005). A systems approach for developing technological literacy. Journal of Technology Education, 17(1), 19-34.
|
59 |
Franssen, M., Lokhorst, G. J., & van de Poel, I. (2009). Philosophy of technology (Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy). Retrieved August 24, 2010, from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/technology/
|
60 |
Harding, P., & Hare, W. (2000). Portraying science accurately in classrooms: Emphasizing open-mindness rather than relativism. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 668-690.
DOI
|
61 |
ITEA(International Technology Education Association). (1996). Technology for All Americans: A rationale and structure for the study of technology (rationale and structure). Reston, VA: ITEA.
|
62 |
ITEA(International Technology Education Association). (2003). Advancing excellence in technological literacy: students assessment, professional development, and program standards. Reston, VA: ITEA
|
63 |
ITEA(International Technology Education Association). (2004). Measuring progress: Assessing students for technological literacy. Reston, VA: ITEA.
|
64 |
ITEA(International Technology Education Association). (2006). Technological literacy for all: A rationale and structure for the study of technology. Reston, VA: ITEA.
|
65 |
Aydin, F. & Tasar, F. (2010). An investigation of pre-service science teachers' cognitive structures and ideas about the nature of technology. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 11(4), 209-221.
|
66 |
Aikenhead, G., & Ryan, A. (1992). The development of a new instrument: Views on science-technology-society(VOSTS). Science Education, 76(5), 477-491.
DOI
|
67 |
American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS] (1990) Project 2061: Science for All Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
|
68 |
American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS] (1993) Benchmarks for Science Literacy. Oxford University Press.
|
69 |
Bayir, E., Cakici, Y., & Ertas, O. (2014). Exploring natural and social scientists' views of nature of science. International Journal of Science Eduation, 36(8), 1286-1312.
DOI
|