Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2018.38.1.1

Analysis of Perception about Maker Education by Invention Class Students  

Byun, Moonkyoung (Sungkyunkwan University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.38, no.1, 2018 , pp. 1-9 More about this Journal
Abstract
The goal of this study is to analyze and understand invention classes, student's experiences, and motivation to suggest a future direction for K-12 Maker Education in Makerspace. We collected qualitative data using open-ended survey from 100 Invention class students. Through data analysis, we could explore perceptions of students about their inventions and meaningful experiences when they used technologies for enhancing their idea and problem finding ability using interpretive approach. We found that the main themes are (1) Perception and motivation to join in the invention class courses, (2) Perception and the normal method of obtaining the idea on invention, (3) Finding new technology for enhancing of knowledge for the invention, and (4) Relevance of the learning experience and invention activities in Makerspace. As a result of this study, we found that the educational programs using technologies should focus on supporting implement of prototypes instead of helping students create their own ideas in Makerspace.
Keywords
Invention Education; Maker Education; Perception about Invention class; Makerspace;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Sim, J. H., Lee, Y. L., & Kim, H. K. (2015). Understanding STEM, STEAM Education, and Addressing the Issues Facing STEAM in the Korean Context. Journal of the Korean Association for in Science Education, 35(4), 709-723.   DOI
2 Sohn, S. J. (2013). Creative economy perspective intellectual property professionals demand outlook. Science and Technology Policy, 193, 72-88.
3 Son, J. W. (2014). The method of Invention educational approaches in science education curriculum dimension when developed integrated curriculum. Korea Association for Gifted Children Alliance Conference, 2014(1), 103-110.
4 Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press.
5 Waller, M. A., & Fawcett, S. E. (2014). Click here to print a maker movement supply chain: how invention and entrepreneurship will disrupt supply chain design. Journal of Business Logistics, 35(2), 99-102.   DOI
6 Winn, W. (2002). Research into practice: Current trends in educational technology research: The study of learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 14(3), 331-351.   DOI
7 Yoo, G. U., Jung, J. W., Kim, Y. S., & Kim, H. B. (2012). Understanding of qualitative research methods. Seoul: Bakyoungsa.
8 Runco, M. A. (2014). Creativity: Theories and themes: Research, development, and practice. Elsevier.
9 Yuk, G. C. (2005). Groping of a New Evaluation Method using the Knowledge State Analysis in the Selective Examination of Scientifical Gifted, Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 15(1), 37-48.
10 Yuk, G. C., Choi, S. N., Han, S. L., Park, S. T., Ryu, J. Y., Mang, D. S., Won, H. J., Kim, Y. S., Lee, J. M., Chun, G. K. (2011). The recommendations freedom optional multilevel selection models and observations for selected gifted invention. The new paradigm of gifted education: Meta-type development of invention gifted education, Korea Invention Promotion Association.
11 Byun, M. K., & Cho, M. H. (2016). Examining ways to support engineering students for choosing a project topic in interdisciplinary collaboration. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 19(1), 37-46.   DOI
12 Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to "the social psychology of creativity.". Westview press.
13 Bajarin, T. (2014, May 19). Why the Maker Movement Is Important to America's Future. Time, Retrieved from http://time.com/104210/aker-faire-maker-movement
14 Boyd, D. (2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. Mac Arthur foundation series on digital learning-Youth, identity, and digital media volume, 119-142.
15 Byun, M. K., Jo, J. H., & Cho, M. H. (2015). The analysis of learner's motivation and satisfaction with 3D printing in science classroom. Journal of the Korean Association for in Science Education, 35(5), 877-884.   DOI
16 Gardner, H. (2011). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. Basic Books.
17 Chu, S. L., Quek, F., Bhangaonkar, S., Ging, A. B., & Sridharamurthy, K. (2015). Making the Maker: A Means-to-an-Ends approach to nurturing the Maker mindset in elementary-aged children. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 5, 11-19.   DOI
18 Dougherty, D. (2012). The maker movement. innovations, 7(3), 11-14.   DOI
19 Feldman, D. H., Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Gardner, H. (1994). Changing the world: A framework for the study of creativity. Praeger Publishers/ Geenwood Publishing Group.
20 Gardner, H. (2008). 5 minds for the future. Harvard Business School Publishing.
21 Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing Qualitative Research in Educ, State University New York Press.
22 Honey, M., & Kanter, D. E. (Eds.). (2013). Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators. London: Routledge.
23 Howland, J. L., Jonassen, D. H., & Marra, R. M. (2012). Meaningful learning with technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
24 Hwang, S. J. (2014). Discussion of 'The method of entrepreneurship development through the invention education'. Creative invention Educational Conference, 2, 135-137.
25 Hyun, H. J., & Kim, K. H. (2014). Design⋅technology convergence for DIO type of training simulation. Korea Institute of Science and Art Forum, 18, 735-746.
26 Jonassen, D., & Land, S. (Eds.). (2012). Theoretical foundations of learning environments. Routledge.
27 Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective.
28 Kim, S. H. (2016a). Let's prepare for the intelligence information society future education. Retrieved from http://news.donga.com/View?gid=7882322&ate=20160501
29 Kalil, T. (2010). Remarks on innovation, education, and the Maker movement. New York Hall of Science. Retrieved from http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/10/innovation-education-and-the-m.html
30 Karakus, T. (2014). Practices and Potential of Activity Theory for Educational Technology Research. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Springer New York, 151-160.
31 Kim, J. S. (2016b). Elementary School Pre-service Teachers Perception and Educational Needs toward Invention Education. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education. 28(2), 189-206.
32 Kim, J. Y. (2017, Nobember, 11). 'Nuri Conflict' is now an old saying ... Reflects all of the 1 year budget of the Seoul Education Office, http://www.segye.com/newsView/20171110004679
33 Kim, S. P., Byun, C. G., & Ha, H. H. (2014). Creativity and Entrepreneurship : What is The Relationship between Creativity and Entrepreneurship. Korean Management Consulting Review, 14(3), 67-78.
34 Jonassen, D. H., & Rohrer-Murphy, L. (1999). Activity theory as a framework for designing constructivist learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47 (1), 61-79.   DOI
35 Kim, Y. I., Choi, Y. H., Jeon, I. G., Lee, W. C., & Kwack, S. M. (2005). A study on the objective system and contents standards for an invention education through a school subject. The Journal of Vocational Education Research, 24(3), 123-146.
36 Kim, Y. J., & Nho, B. S. (2012). A study of entrepreneurship education effect on the self-leadership and entrepreneurship. Journal of Digital Convergence, 10(6), 23-31.   DOI
37 Kim, Y. O. (1996). Qualitative Research Methods and Design for Education and Research. Seoul: Muneumsa.
38 Lee, K. N., Lee, B. W., & Park, K. M. (2013). Comparative analysis of similar studies for establishing identity of the invention education. The Korean Journal of Technology Education, 13(2), 42-62.
39 Lee, E. S. (2015). Research Trends and Issues of Invention Education in Early Childhood, Elementary and Secondary Education : Focussing on Journals in Korea. Journal of Practical Arts Education, 31(3), 333-356.
40 Lee, B. W., Shim, K. C., & Kim, H. B. (2017). Perception of Science Educators about Invention Education in Science Education. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education. 37(1), 17-24.
41 Lee, J. H., Park, G. B., Jin, S. U., Ryu, J. Y., Lee, S. C., An, S. H., & Jin, B. U. (2012). Understanding Characteristics of the Gifted in Invention for Establishing the Concept of the Gifted in Invention. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 22(3), 551-573.   DOI
42 Martin, L. (2015). The promise of the Maker Movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 5(1), 4.
43 Lee, J. H., Park, G. B., Jin, S. U, Jun, M. L. (2014). Teachers' Perception on Differentiation of Gifted Education in Invention from Gifted Education in Science. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 24(4), 597-612.   DOI
44 Lee, J. H., Park, K. B. (2014). Conceptions Toward ICT in Students of Giftedness in Invention Classes. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 22(3), 551-573.   DOI
45 Lee, J. H., Yang, H. I., & Sun, J. Y. (2012). Korean science and technology innovation ODA strategy. Policy Research, 1-346.
46 Martinez, S. L., & Stager, G. (2013). Invent to learn: Making, tinkering, and engineering in the classroom. Torrance, CA: Constructing modern knowledge press.
47 Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (2014). Endless imagining room operations manual. Retrieved from https://www.kofac.re.kr/?page_id=1677&uid=4277&mod=document
48 McCue, T. J. (2011). First public library to create a maker space. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/sites/tjmccue/2011/11/15/first-public-libraryto-create-a-maker-space
49 Milne, L. (2013). Nurturing the designerly thinking and design capabilities of five-year-olds: Technology in the new entrant classroom. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 349-360.   DOI
50 Ministry of education (2014). 2015 released general remarks' highlights of the integrated curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.moe.go.kr/web/106888/ko/board/view.do?bbsId=339&boardSeq=56875
51 Park, Y. S., Glenn. J., & Gorden, T. (2014). The UN Future Report 2045, Kyung-gi: Kyobo Book Centre.
52 Mun, D. Y. (2012). The Process of Inventive Idea Creation of Inventively Gifted Elementary School Students: A Case Study on the Six Thinking Hats. Journal of Korean practical arts education, 25(2), 63-83.
53 Park, G. Y., & Choi, H. S. (2011). A Study of teaching-learning practices in education center for the talented in invention. The Journal of Vocational Education Research, 30(4), 281-300.
54 Park, Y, S. (2016). The Period of Makers. Kyung-gi: Kyobo Book Centre.
55 Peppler, K., & Bender, S. (2013). Maker movement spreads innovation one project at a time. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(3), 22-27.   DOI
56 Peppler, K., Halverson, E., & Kafai, Y. B. (Eds.). (2016). Makeology: Makerspaces as learning environments (Vol. 1). London: Routledge.
57 Pink, D. H. (2006). Whole new mind : why right-brainers will rule the future. Seoul: The Korea Economic Daily.
58 Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge. Routledge.
59 Seo, H. E., Jeong, H. C., Son, J. W., Lee, B. J., & Maeng, H. J. (2006). Development of content standards for invention education. Seoul:Korean Educational Development Institute, Daejeon: Korea Intellectual Property Office.
60 Seo, H, A., Cho, S. H., Kim, H. W., Jung, H. C., & Sohn, Y. A. (2002). Invention Education Content Standards Development. KIPO Research Reports.
61 Shin, D. H. (2014), Collaboration between the human and the computer, Seoul: Communication Books.