1 |
Jhun, Y. S., & Jeon, M. J. (2010). The difficulty that is caused open inquiry instruction. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 20(1), 105-115.
|
2 |
Jung, W.-K., Lee, J.-K., & Oh, S. W. (2011). Investigation on the difficulties during middle school students' finding inquiry topics on open-inquiry activities. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(8), 1199-1213.
|
3 |
Kampourakis, C., & Tsaparlis, G. (2003). A study of the effect of a practical activity on problem solving in chemistry. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 4(3), 319-333.
DOI
|
4 |
Kang, Y. R., & Cho, C. S. (2015). An activity theoretical analysis on the instrumental orchestration of the teacher: Focusing on the calculator-based classroom activities of gifted elementary math students. Journal of Korea Society Educational Studies in Mathematics, 17(2), 273-287.
|
5 |
Verillon, P., & Rabardel, P. (1995). Cognition and artifacts: A contribution to the study of though in relation to instrumented activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10(1), 77-101.
DOI
|
6 |
Wellington, J. J. (1998). Practical work in science: Time for a reappraisal. In J. J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science (pp. 3-15). New York: Routledge.
|
7 |
Lee, S. (2015). Materiality of science technologized. Journal of the Society of Philosophical Studies, 111, 123-148.
|
8 |
Lee, S. (2000). The nature and structure of experimentation: Epistemic approach founded on theory-network. (Doctoral dissertation). Seoul National University, Seoul.
|
9 |
Lee, S. (2004). Philosophical understanding of doing experience. Korea: Seokwangsa.
|
10 |
Lee, S. (2009). Phenomena and instruments. Korea: Hanul academy.
|
11 |
Lee, S.-K., Han, J., Lee, J., & Noh, T. (2015). Characteristics of student inquiry found in project-based science practices: Focusing on theory-evidence-method coordinations and skills in using tools. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(4), 599-608.
DOI
|
12 |
McGrenere, J., & Ho, W. (2000). Affordances: Clarifying and evolving a concept. Proceedings of Graphics Interface. Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society, Toronto, 2000, 179-186.
|
13 |
Metz, K. (2004). Children's understanding of scientific inquiry: Their conceptualization of uncertainty in investigations of their own design. Cognition and Instruction, 22(2), 219-290.
DOI
|
14 |
Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Doubleday.
|
15 |
Oh, P. S. (2017). An interpretation of modeling-based elementary science lessons from a perspective of distributed cognition. Elementary Science Education, 36(1), 16-30.
DOI
|
16 |
Kim, H., & Song, J. (2003). Middle school students’ ideas about the purposes of laboratory work. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 23(3), 254-264.
|
17 |
Staer, H., Goodrum, D., & Hackling, M. (1998). High school laboratory work in western Australia: Opennes to inquiry. Research in Science Education, 28(2), 219-228.
DOI
|
18 |
Tomkins, S. P., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2001). Looking for ideas: Observation, interpretation and hypothesis-making by 12-year-old pupils undertaking science investigations. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 791-813.
DOI
|
19 |
Trouche, L. (2004). Managing the complexity of human/machine interactions in computerized learning environments: Guiding students’ command process through instrumental orchestrations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9(3), 281-307.
DOI
|
20 |
Kapon, S. (2016). Doing research in school: Physics inquiry in the zone of proximal development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(8), 1172-1197.
DOI
|
21 |
Kim, S.-J. (2010). Re-understanding of technoscience and nature through actor-network theory. Journal of the Korean Geographical Society, 45(4), 461-477.
|
22 |
Kim, Y., & Yang, I.-H. (2005). The factor analysis of affecting elementary students’ science attitude change. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 24(3), 292-300.
|
23 |
Lee, J. H., Nam, J. H., & Moon, S. B. (2003). The effects of a performance assessment based on the experimental practice on student’s science achievement and affective domain in the middle school science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 23(1), 66-74.
|
24 |
Greeno, J. G. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53(1), 5-26.
DOI
|
25 |
Park, H. (2012). A development of affordances design strategy for improvement of pedagogical usability on e-learning contents user interfaces. (Doctoral dissertation). Chung-Ang University, Seoul.
|
26 |
Park, J. (2000). Analysis of students' processes of generating scientific explanatory hypothesis: Focused on the definition and the characteristics of scientific hypothesis. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(4), 667-679.
|
27 |
Choi, C. I., & Lee, S.-K. (2016). Reconsidering the meanings of experiments and instruments based on the analysis of chemistry experiments in textbooks. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 60(4), 267-275.
DOI
|
28 |
Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Massachusetts: MIT Press.
|
29 |
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
|
30 |
Han, S. H., & Chang, K. Y. (2009). Instrumental genesis of Computer Algebra System(CAS) in mathematical problem solving among high school students. School Mathematics, 11(3), 527-546.
|
31 |
Han, Y.-H. (2012). Development of classroom inquiry model to improve scientific communication ability. (Doctoral dissertation). Korea National University of Education, Cheongju.
|
32 |
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Nagarajan, A., & Day, R. S. (2002). "It's harder than we thought it would be": A comparative case study of expert-novice experimentation. Science Education, 86(2), 219-243.
DOI
|
33 |
Yang, I.-H., Jeong, J.-W., Kim, Y.-S., Kim, M.-K., & Cho, H.-J. (2006). Analyses of the aims of laboratory activity, interaction, and inquiry process within laboratory instruction in secondary school science. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 27(5), 509-520.
|
34 |
Yoo, J., & Kim, J. (2012). Middle school students’ construction of physics inquiry problems and variables isolation and clarification during small group open-inquiry activities. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(5), 903-927.
DOI
|
35 |
Anderson, K., Frappier, M., Neswald, E., & Trim, H. (2013). Reading instruments: Objects, texts and museums. Science & Education, 22(5), 1167-1189.
DOI
|
36 |
Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7(3), 245-274.
DOI
|
37 |
Baird, D. (2004). Thing knowledge: A philosophy of scientific instruments. Berkeley: University of California Press.
|
38 |
Hart, C., Mulhall, P., Berry, A., Loughran, J., & Gunstone, R. (2000). What is the purpose of this experiment? Or can students learn something from doing experiments? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 655-675.
DOI
|
39 |
Hartson, H. R. (2003). Cognitive, physical, sensory, and functional affordances in interaction design. Behavior & Information Technology, 22(5), 315-338.
DOI
|
40 |
Jeong, J., Lee, K., & Kim, J. (2006). Analysis of inquiry teaching levels of beginning science teachers in middle school science laboratories. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 27(4), 364-373.
|
41 |
Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218.
DOI
|
42 |
Bell, R. L., Blair, L. M., Crawford, B. A., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students’ understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 487-509.
DOI
|
43 |
Bud, R., & Warner, D. (1998). Instruments of science. An historical encyclopedia. London and New York: Smithsonian Institution.
|
44 |
Chamizo, J. A. (2014). The role of instruments in three chemical' revolutions. Science & Education, 23(4), 955-982.
DOI
|
45 |
Park, Y.-S. (2006). Theoretical study on the opportunity of scientific argumentation for implementing authentic scientific inquiry. Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 27(4), 401-415.
|
46 |
Perry, P. (1995). Getting started in science fairs: From planning to judging. New York: McGraw-Hill.
|
47 |
Pine, J., Aschbacher, P., Roth, E., Jones, M., McPhee, C., Martin, C., Phelps, S., Kyle, T., & Foley, B. (2006). Fifth graders’ science inquiry abilities: A comparative study of students in hands-on and textbook curricula. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(5), 467-484.
DOI
|
48 |
Roth, W.-M. (1995). Authentic school science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
|
49 |
Rudolph, J. L. (2005). Inquiry, instrumentalism, and the public understanding of science. Science Education, 89(5), 803-821.
DOI
|
50 |
Shin, H.-H., & Kim, H.-N. (2010). Analysis of elementary teachers' and students' views about difficulties on open science inquiry activities. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(3), 262-276.
|