Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.5.0729

Analyzing Korean Pre-service Biology Teachers' Understanding of the Concept of Natural Selection in Comparison with Chinese, American, and German Biology Majors  

Ha, Minsu (Kangwon National University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.36, no.5, 2016 , pp. 729-737 More about this Journal
Abstract
Natural selection is the core idea of evolution that pre-service biology teachers need to understand to solve diverse biological problem. This study aims to investigate the level of Korean pre-service biology teachers' understanding of natural selection by comparing their knowledge with their Chinese, American, and German biology major undergraduate counterparts. In particular, this study focuses on two conceptual components of natural selection (i.e., ecology and genetics). This study used a total 1226 pre-service biology teachers and biology majors' data. The instrument measuring the understanding of natural selection concepts was Conceptual Inventory of Natural Selection, which consists of ten ecology concept items and ten genetics concept items. The Rasch model analysis, multivariate analysis of variance, and univariate analysis of variance were used for the statistical tests. The result reveals that the level of Korean pre-service biology teachers' understanding of natural selection were similar with Chinese undergraduates' understanding and significantly lower than American and German undergraduates.' In the first year student data, the level of genetics concept of Korean pre-service biology teachers were significantly lower than Chinese and German students. In the fourth year student data, the level of ecology concept of Korean pre-service biology teachers were significantly lower than American and German students. Based on these results, the ecology concept education and balanced natural selection concept education are discussed.
Keywords
international comparison; natural selection; pre-service biology teacher; ecology concept; genetics concept;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Ahn, K. J., Oh, H. S., & Kang, K. H. (2014). Analysis according to evaluation contents item of problems related 'biology' subject contents knowledge in secondary school teacher certification examination. Teacher Education Research, 53(1), 143-161.   DOI
2 Anderson, D. L., Fisher, K. M., & Norman, G. J. (2002). Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 952-978.   DOI
3 Bogner, F. X. (1998). The influence of short-term outdoor ecology education on long-term variables of environmental perspective. The Journal of Environmental Education, 29(4), 17-29.   DOI
4 Brumby, M. N. (1984). Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students. Science Education, 68(4), 493-503.   DOI
5 Cho, H. H., Kim, H. K, Yoon, H. S., & Lee, K. Y. (2014). Theories of Science Education. Seoul. Gyoyuk Gwahaksa.
6 Grossschedl, J., Harms, U., Kleickmann, T., & Glowinski, I. (2015). Preservice biology teachers' professional knowledge: Structure and learning opportunities. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 26(3), 291-318.   DOI
7 Ha, M. (2016a). The comparative analysis of evolution conceptions in preand in-service biology teachers. Biology Education, 44(2), 277-288.   DOI
8 Ha, M., Cha, H. Y., & Ku, S. (2012). Comparative study of Korean and United States college students' degree of religiosity, evolutionary interest, understanding and acceptance and their structure. Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(10), 1537-1550.
9 Ha, M. (2016b). Examining the validity of history-of-science-based evolution concept assessment and exploring conceptual progressions by contexts. Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 36(3), 509-517.   DOI
10 Ha, M., & Cha, H. Y. (2007). A qualitative cross-sectional study on explanation about evolution mechanism. Biology Education, 35(1), 106-116.   DOI
11 Kim, S. Y., & Nehm, R. H. (2011). A cross-cultural comparison of Korean and American science teachers' views of evolution and the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 197-227.   DOI
12 Husen, T. (1996). Lessons from the IEA studies, International Journal of Educational Research, 25(3), 207-218.   DOI
13 Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2008). Students'intuitive explanations of the causes of homologies and adaptations. Science & Education, 17(1), 27-47.   DOI
14 Kim, B. M., Han, H. J., & Shim, K. C. (2016). Implications of teacher training for pre-service secondary biology teachers at the college of education through analyzing the examination for appointing secondary school biology teachers. Biology Education, 44(1), 179-189.   DOI
15 Kim, Y. S., Kwon, Y. J., Kim, Y. J., Kim, H. B., Seo, H. A., Son, Y. A., Jeong, E. Y., Jeong, J. S., Cha, H. Y. (2012). Theories of Biological Science Education. Paju: Freedom Academy Pub. Co.
16 Kwon, J. E., & Cha, H. (2015). Analyzing the effect of argumentation program for improving teachers' conceptions of evolution. Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 35(4), 691-707.   DOI
17 National Research Council. (2012). Framework for K-12 Science Education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
18 Lee, S. N., & Cha, H. (2014). Qualitative case study of biology teachers' recognition process of evolutionary explanations included in teaching not the title of evolution in biology, Biology Education, 42(4), 450-466.   DOI
19 Mayr, E. (1998). This is Biology. The Science of the Living World. (6th Ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20 Meir, E., Perry, J., Herron, J. C., & Kingsolver, J. (2007). College students' misconceptions about evolutionary trees. The American Biology Teacher, 69(7), 71-76.   DOI
21 NRC (1993). A collaborative agenda for improving international comparative studies in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
22 Nehm, R. H., & Ha, M. (2011). Item feature effects in evolution assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(3), 237-256.   DOI
23 Nehm, R. H., & Schonfeld, I. S. (2007). Does increasing biology teacher knowledge of evolution and the nature of science lead to greater preference for the teaching of evolution in schools? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(5), 699-723.   DOI
24 Neumann, I., Neumann, K., & Nehm, R. (2011). Evaluating instrument quality in science education: Rasch-based analyses of a nature of science test. International Journal of Science Education, 33(10), 1373-1405.   DOI
25 Olsen, E. M., Heino, M., Lilly, G. R., Morgan, M. J., Brattey, J., Ernande, B., & Dieckmann, U. (2004). Maturation trends indicative of rapid evolution preceded the collapse of northern cod. Nature, 428(6986), 932-935.   DOI
26 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (1992). The OECD international education indicators: A framework for analysis. Paris: OECD Publishing.
27 Yoo, H. M. & Kim, J. G. (2006). A study on the biology II textbooks by analyzing questions for the college scholastics ability test and the biology teachers' appointment test - Focused on the chapters of taxonomy and ecology - . Biology Education, 34(3), 307-320.
28 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2012). PISA 2009 Technical Report. Paris: OECD Publishing.
29 Settlage Jr, J. (1994). Conceptions of Natural Selection: A Snapshot of the Sense-Making Process. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 449-457.   DOI
30 Wright, B.D. & Linacre, J.M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square-fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370.