Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.4.0681

Analysis of Pre-service Secondary Chemistry Teachers' Uses of Teacher's Guide in Planning Lessons  

Yang, Chanho (Seoul National University)
Song, Nayoon (Seoul National University)
Kim, Minhwan (Seoul National University)
Noh, Taehee (Seoul National University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.36, no.4, 2016 , pp. 681-691 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, we investigated pre-service secondary chemistry teachers' use of teacher's guide in planning lessons. Eleven pre-service teachers at a college of education in Seoul participated in this study. Textbooks and teacher's guide books including various teaching materials were provided. Pre-service teachers used teacher's guide while they planned two lessons, which were a lecture and an instruction using science teaching model. A semi-structured interview was conducted. All of the teaching-learning materials and interviews were analyzed. The analyses of the results revealed that most pre-service teachers followed each lesson presented in teacher's guide, but they did not consider the structure of the whole unit and science curriculum. There were some cases that the exemplary lesson planning in teacher's guide helped them to select science teaching model. They modified the questions of textbook activity in planning their lecture. On the other hand, they modified the activity to fit each stage of the model in planning their instruction using science teaching models. Most pre-service teachers constructed their own worksheets by applying the materials of the teacher's guide. They recognized the components of assessment by considering exemplary lesson planning from the teacher's guide, and created questions by modifying the content of textbooks and teacher's guide books including various teaching materials. However, the questions which they made were limited in context of knowledge. They evaluated that introductory questions were not of interest to students, and modified or added new materials. Educational implications of these findings are discussed.
Keywords
PDC; teacher's guide; planning lessons; pre-service science teacher;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 8  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Arzi, H. J., & White, R. T. (2008). Change in teachers' knowledge of subject matter: A 17-year longitudinal study. Science Education, 92(2), 221-251.   DOI
2 Barab, S. A., & Luehmann, A. L. (2003). Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation. Science Education, 87(4), 454-467.   DOI
3 Beyer, C. J. (2009). Using reform-based criteria to support the development of preservice elementary teachers' pedagogical design capacity for analyzing science curriculum materials. (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Michigan.
4 Beyer, C. J., & Davis, E. A. (2009). Using educative curriculum materials to support preservice elementary teachers' curricular planning: A comparison between two different forms of support. Curriculum Inquiry, 39(5), 679-703.   DOI
5 Beyer, C. J., Delgado, C., Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Investigating teacher learning supports in high school biology curricular programs to inform the design of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(9), 977-998.   DOI
6 Bismack, A. S., Arias, A. M., Davis, E. A., & Palincsar, A. S. (2014). Connecting curriculum materials and teachers: Elementary science teachers' enactment of a reform-based curricular unit. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(4), 489-512.   DOI
7 Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. (2006). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
8 Brown, M. (2009). The teacher-tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials. In J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, & G. M. Lloyd (Eds.), Mathematics teachers at work: Connecting curriculum materials and classroom instruction (pp. 17-36). NY: Routledge.
9 Cho, H.-H., & Ko, Y.-J. (2008). Exploration of pedagogical content knowledge(PCK)-based curricular model in biology teacher education and analysis of subjects required in curriculum of biology education. Biology Education, 36(3), 325-341.   DOI
10 Choi, J.-Y. (2006). An qualitative case study of pre-service teacher's planning for the practical arts instruction in the elementary school. The Journal of Elementary Education, 19(1), 477-499.
11 Choi, S., Lee, J., & Noh, T. (2015). A case study of preservice secondary science teachers' demonstration of STEAM lessons. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(4), 665-676.   DOI
12 Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3-14.
13 Davis, E. A., Palincsar, A. S., Arias, A. M., Bismack, A. S., Marulis, L., & Iwashyna, S. (2014). Designing educative curriculum materials: A theoretically and empirically driven process. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 24-52.   DOI
14 Dietz, C. M., & Davis, E. A. (2009). Preservice elementary teachers' reflection on narrative images of inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20(3), 219-243.   DOI
15 Drake, C., & Sherin, M. G. (2006). Practicing change: Curriculum adaptation and teacher narrative in the context of mathematics education reform. Curriculum Inquiry, 36(2), 153-187.   DOI
16 Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy. Grossman, P., & Thompson, C. (2008). Learning from curriculum materials: Scaffolds for new teachers? Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 2014-2026.   DOI
17 Drake, C., Land, T. J., & Tyminski, A. M. (2014). Using educative curriculum materials to support the development of prospective teachers' knowledge. Educational Researcher, 43(3), 154-162.   DOI
18 Forbes, C. T., & Davis, E. A. (2008). The development of preservice elementary teachers' curricular role identity for science teaching. Science Education, 92(5), 909-940.   DOI
19 Grossman, P., & Thompson, C. (2004). Curriculum Materials: Scaffolds for New Teacher Learning? (A Research Report No. R-04-1). Seattle, WA:
20 Han, K.-A., & Noh, S.-G. (2003). An analysis on the utilization of teacher's guides for science in elementary school. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 22(1), 51-64.
21 Jang, M. D. (2006). Anlysis of pre-service teachers' lesson planing strategies in elementary school science. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 25(2), 191-205.
22 Jang, M.-D., Joung, Y.-J., & Kim, H.-J. (2011). The elementary school teachers' conceptions and utilization on the general remarks in the science teacher's guide. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(4), 535-552.
23 Kang, S., Lim, H., Yeo, S.-I., Choi, S.-Y., Shin, M.-K., Joung, Y. J. (2011). Elementary school teachers' needs about teachers' manual for science instruction. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 30(3), 296-304.
24 Kauffman, D., Johnson, S. M., Kardos, S. M., Liu, E., & Peske, H. (2002). "Lost at sea": New teachers' experiences with curriculum and assessment. Teachers College Record, 104(2), 273-300.   DOI
25 Kweon, J.-M., Chung, W.-H., & Kim, Y.-S. (2001). Teachers' perception and improvement on the elementary science teacher's guide. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 20(1), 75-89.
26 Kim, K., Yoon, J., Park, J., & Noh, T. (2011). The components of pedagogical content knowledge considered by secondary pre-service teachers in planning and implementing teaching demonstrations. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(1), 99-114.
27 Ko, M., Nam, J., & Lim, J. (2009). Two case studies of the development of beginning science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 29(1), 54-67.
28 Kwak, Y. (2008). Pedagogical content knowledge(PCK) and instructional consulting for beginning teachers in secondary school science (Research Report ORM 2008-29-3). Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
29 Kwon, C. S., & Park, B. T. (2010). The teacher's recognition and utilization for subject of new science teacher's guide in the elementary School. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 21(2), 247-260.   DOI
30 Min, H. J., Park, C. Y., & Paik, S. H. (2010). An analysis of beginning science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge through the teaching practice. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 30(4), 437-451.
31 Mulholland, J., & Wallace, J. (2005). Growing the tree of teacher knowledge: Ten years of learning to teach elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 767-790.   DOI
32 Noh, T., Lee, J., Kang, S., & Kang, H. (2015). Secondary school science teachers' actual and preferred types of assessment. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(4), 725-733.   DOI
33 Park, K. (2010). Development of descriptive instructional design model based on the expert teacher's instructional planning. Journal of Educational Technology, 26(3), 21-52.   DOI
34 Nowicki, B. L., Sullivan-Watts, B., Shim, M. K., Young, B., & Pockalny, R. (2013). Factors influencing science content accuracy in elementary inquiry science lessons. Research in Science Education, 43(3), 1135-1154.   DOI
35 Park, C. Y., Min, H. J., & Paik, S. H. (2008). An analysis of pre-service science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge through the student-teacher practice. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(6), 641-648.
36 Park, K. (2008). A case study on instructional planning process of teachers. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 25(3), 379-405.   DOI
37 Park, K.-Y., Bae, Y.-G., & Kang, E.-C. (2009). A case study on instructional design process of pre-service teachers in practice teaching. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 26(3), 169-197.
38 Park, S. (2008). Development of prospective teachers' pedagogical content knowledge during student teaching in a secondary teacher education program. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 8(1), 169-189.
39 Porter, A. C., & Smithson, J. L. (2001). Defining, developing, and using curriculum indicators (CPRE Research Report Series No. RR-048). Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
40 Remillard, J. T., & Bryans, M. B. (2004). Teachers' orientations toward mathematics curriculum materials: Implications for teacher learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 352-388.   DOI
41 Remillard, J. T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211-246.   DOI
42 Squire, K. D., MaKinster, J. G., Barnett, M., Luehmann, A. L., & Barab, S. L. (2003). Designed curriculum and local culture: Acknowledging the primacy of classroom culture. Science Education, 87(4), 468-489.   DOI
43 Schwarz, C. V., Gunckel, K. L., Smith, E. L., Covitt, B. A., Bae, M., Enfield, M., & Tsurusaki, B. (2008). Helping elementary preservice teachers learn to use curriculum materials for effective science teaching. Science Education, 92(2), 345-377.   DOI
44 Seo, K.-H. (2009). Teachers' experience of reconstructing national curriculum. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 27(3), 159-189.   DOI
45 Sherin, M. G., & Drake, C. (2009). Curriuclum strategy framework: Investigating patterns in teachers' use of a reform-based elementary mathematics curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(4), 467-500.   DOI
46 Yang, C., Bae, Y., & Noh, T. (2013). Analysis of pre-service secondary science teachers' uses of curriculum materials in curriculum design. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(7), 1312-1328.   DOI
47 Yang, C., Lee, J., & Noh, T. (2014). The characteristics of lesson planning of pre-service secondary science teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(2), 187-195.   DOI
48 Yoon, J., Kang, S., & Noh, T. (2010). The study on the perceptions of pre-service elementary school teachers toward constructivist science assessment. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(1), 86-92.