1 |
Anderson, D. L., Fisher, K. M., & Norman, G. J. (2002). Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 952-978.
DOI
|
2 |
Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 415-427.
DOI
|
3 |
Board on Science Education. (2012). A Framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
|
4 |
Boulter, C. J., & Buckley, B. C. (2000). Constructing a typology of models for science education. In Developing models in science education (pp. 41-57). Springer Netherlands.
|
5 |
Buckley, B. C. (2000). Interactive multimedia and model-based learning in biology. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 895-935.
DOI
|
6 |
Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
|
7 |
Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., & Lavancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
|
8 |
Cho, H., Yang, I., Lee, H., & Song, Y. (2008). An Analysis on the Level of Evidence used in Gifted Elementary Students' Debate. Journal of the Korean Association for science education, 28(5), 495-505.
|
9 |
Cho, H. (2013). Epistemic level in middle school students' small-group argumentation using first-hand or second-hand data. Master's Thesis. The Graduate School Seoul National University.
|
10 |
Cho, H. (2014). Development and effect of argument-based modeling strategy as teaching method in middle school students. Dissertation. Graduate School Pusan National University.
|
11 |
Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 35(3), 125-129.
DOI
|
12 |
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312.
DOI
|
13 |
Evans, E. M. (2000). The emergence of beliefs about the origins of species in school-age children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 46, 221-254.
|
14 |
Ferrari, M., & Chi, M. T. H.(1998). The nature of naive explanations of natural selection. International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1231-1256.
DOI
|
15 |
Furtak (2012). Linking Progression for Natural Selection to Teachers' Enactment of Formative Assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 1181-1220
|
16 |
Gutheil, G., Vera, A., & Keil, F. C. (1998). Do houseflies think? Patterns of induction and biological beliefs in development. Cognition, 66, 33-49.
DOI
|
17 |
Ha, M., & Cha, H. (2006). Analysis of Mis-conceptualizations regarding Evolution Originating from TV Animation and Science Books for Children. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 25(4), 352-362.
|
18 |
Ha, M., Cha, H., & Ku, S. (2010). A Study of Conceptions, Interest and Acceptance of Evolution, and Religiosity between Biology Majors and Non-majors in Colleges, The Korean Journal of Biology Education, 38(3), 467-475.
|
19 |
Ha, M., Lee, J., & Cha, H. (2006). A Cross-Sectional Study of Students' Conceptions on Evolution and Characteristics of Concept Formation about It in Terms of the Subjects: Human, Animals and Plants. Journal of the Korean Association for science education, 26(7), 813-825.
|
20 |
Ha, M. (2007). Development of The instructional strategies of evolution based on The cross-sectional analysis of evolution conception. Master's Thesis. Graduate School of Korea National University of Education.
|
21 |
Hand, B., & Choi, A. (2010). Examining the impact of student use of multiple modal representations in constructing arguments in organic chemistry laboratory classes. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 29-44.
DOI
|
22 |
Hubber, P., Tytler, R., & Haslam, F. (2010). Teaching and learning about force with a representational focus: pedagogy and teacher change. Research in Science Education, 40, 5-28.
DOI
|
23 |
Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (2002). Young children's naive thinking about the biological world. Psychology Press : New York.
|
24 |
Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (2006). Young children's conception of the biological world. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(4), 177-181.
DOI
|
25 |
Jang, W. (2014). Research on the preconceptual type and the cause of conceptual formation of biological adaptation in 5th grade elementary school student. Master's Thesis. Graduate School of Korea National University of Education.
|
26 |
Jeffery, K. R. (1994) A study of the presence of evolutionary protoconcepts in pre-high school textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 507-518.
DOI
|
27 |
Kuhn, L., & Reiser, B. (2006). Structuring activities to foster argumentative discourse. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
|
28 |
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M., & Erduran, S. (2008). Argumentation in science education: An overview. In S. Erduran & M. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education : perspectives from classroom-based research(pp.3-28). Dordrecht London: Springer.
|
29 |
Jo, J. (2014). Pre-service biology teachers' perspectives about biological meanings of competition and adaptation. Master's Thesis. Graduate School of Korea National University of Education.
|
30 |
Jung, J., & Kim, H. (2010). Influence of ACESE on high school students' argumentative structure and evolutionary conception. Biology Education. 38(1), 168-183.
DOI
|
31 |
Kwon, J., & Cha, H. (2015) Analyzing the effect of argumentation program for improving teachers' conceptions of evolution. Journal of the Korean Association for science education, 35(4), 691-707.
DOI
|
32 |
Lee. G., Kwon. Y., Kim. Y., Baek. S., Shin. D., Yun. Y., Jang. Y., & Cho. M (2013). Life ScienceI. Seoul: Sangsangacademy Co.
|
33 |
Lee. J., Lee. B., Ku. H., Oh. H., Ryu. H., & Kang. H. (2012). Life Science II. Seoul: Chunjae Education Co.
|
34 |
Lee. M., Oh. S., & Lee. G. (2005). Analysis of Elementary School Children's Concepts in Evolution Based on Science History. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 24(2), 145-159.
|
35 |
Mayer, R. E., Bove, W., Bryman, A., Mars, R., & Tapango, L. (1996). When is less more: meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessons. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 64-73.
DOI
|
36 |
Mayr, E. (1997). This is biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
|
37 |
Nehm, R. H., & Ha, M. (2011). Item feature effects in evolution assessment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(3), 237-256.
DOI
|
38 |
McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students' construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153-191.
DOI
|
39 |
Medin, D. L., & Atran, S. (2004). The native mind: Biological categorization and reasoning in development and across cultures. Psychological Review, 111, 960-983.
DOI
|
40 |
Nehm, R. H., Ha, M., Rector, M., Opfer, J., Perrin, L., Ridgway, J., & Mollohan, K. (2010). Scoring guide for the open response instrument (ORI) and evolutionary gain and loss test (EGALT). Technical Report of National Science Foundation REESE Project 0909999. Accessed online 10 Jan 2011 at: http://evolutionassessment.org.
|
41 |
NRC(National Research Council) (2011). A framework for K-12 science education; Practice, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington D. C.: National Academy Press.
|
42 |
Oh. P., & Lee. J. (2014). Criteria for Evaluating Scientific Models Used by Pre-service Elementary Teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for science education, 34(2), 135-146.
DOI
|
43 |
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020.
DOI
|
44 |
Poling, D. A., & Evans, E. M. (2002). Why do birds of a feather flock together? Developmental change in the use of multiple explanations: Intention, teleology, essentialism. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 89-112.
DOI
|
45 |
Reece, J. B., Urry, L. A., Cain, M. L., Wasserman, S. A., Minorsky, P. V., & Jackson, R. B. (2012). Campbell Biology, 9th Eds. Pearson Education, Inc.
|
46 |
Sampson, V., & Clark, D. (2011). A comparison of the collaborative scientific argumentation practices of two high and two low performing groups. Research in Science Education, 41, 63-97.
DOI
|
47 |
Rutledge, M. L., Warden, M. A. (2000). Evolutionary theory, the nature of science & high school biology teachers: critical relationships. The American Biology Teacher, 62(1), 23-31. 448-484.
DOI
|
48 |
Sampson, V. & Clark, D. (2008). The Impact of collaboration on the outcomes of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 93(3), 448-484.
DOI
|
49 |
Sampson, V., & Clark, D. (2009). The effect of collaboration on the outcomes of argumentation. Science Education, 93(3), 448-484.
DOI
|
50 |
Sampson, V., & Grooms, J. (2010). Generate an argument: an instructional Model. Science Teacher, 77(5), 32-37.
|
51 |
Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. P. (2011). Argument-driven inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study. Science Education, 95(2), 217-257.
DOI
|
52 |
Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Acher, A., Fortus, D., Schwarz, Y., Hug, B., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632-654.
DOI
|
53 |
Smith, M. U. (2010). Current status of research in teaching and learning evolution: II. padagogical issues. Science & Education, 19(6-8), 539-571.
DOI
|
54 |
Walton, D. M. (1990). What is reasoning? what is an argument?. The Journal of Philosophy, 87, 399-419.
DOI
|
55 |
Yang. I., Kim. H., Park. K., Lim. S., Kim. J., Shin. H., Eum. A., & Baek. S. (2013). Elementary science teachers' guide book 6-1. Seoul: MiraeN.
|