1 |
Shin, J., & Choi, A. (2014). Trends in research studies on scientific argument and writing in Korea. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(2), 107-122.
DOI
|
2 |
Sohn, W. (2008). Multi-level factors influencing the affective domain of Korean students: Results from PISA 2006. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 21(4). 81-105.
|
3 |
Song, H. (2010). Development of a self-reported executive function rating scale for the Korean high school students: a preliminary study. The Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 29(1), 109-124.
DOI
|
4 |
Stufflebeam, D. L., Foley, W. J., Gephart, W. J., Guba, E. G., Hammond, R. L., Merriman, H. O., & Provus, M. M. (1971). Educational evaluation and decision-making in education. Itasca, IL:Peacock Publishers Incorporated.
|
5 |
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, and applications. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
|
6 |
Sung, T., & Si, K. (2015). Research methodology (2nd ed). Hakjisa: Seoul.
|
7 |
Unfried, A., Faber, M., Stanhope, D. S., & Wiebe, E. (2015). The development and validation of a measure of student attitudes toward science, technology, engineering, and math (S-STEM). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(7), 622-639
DOI
|
8 |
Wang, L., Huettel, S., & De Bellis, M. D. (2008). Neural substrates for processing task-irrelevant sad images in adolescents. Developmental Science, 11(1), 23-32.
DOI
|
9 |
Yang, I., Na, J., Lim, S., & Choi, H. (2008). An analysis of elementary schools's science test items by Kopfer's taxonomy of educational objectives: Focusing on the first term of the 5th grade. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 27(3), 221-232.
|
10 |
Yum, S., & Kang, D. (2011). Influence of curricular context factors within student- and school-levels on the 2006 PISA science achievements of Korean students. Journal of the Research Institute of Curriculum Instruction, 15(2), 281-304.
DOI
|
11 |
Abd-El-Khalick, F., Summers, R., Said, Z., Wang, S., & Culbertson, M. (2015). Development and large-scale validation of an instrument to assess Arabic-speaking students' attitudes toward science. International Journal of Science Education, 37(16), 2637-2663.
DOI
|
12 |
Bailey, R. C., & Bailey, K. G. (1974). Self-perceptions of scholastic ability at four grade levels. The Journal of Generic Psychology, 124, 197-212.
DOI
|
13 |
Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human characteristics and school learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
|
14 |
Choe, S., Ku, J., Kim, J., Park, S., Oh, E., Kim, J., & Baek, H. (2013). Strategies for improving the affective characteristics of Korean students based on the results of PISA and TIMSS. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
|
15 |
Chae, S. (1996). Towards a reconstruction of the social scientific methods: a synthesis of qualitative and quantitative methods. The Journal of Educational Research, 34(5), 281-297.
|
16 |
Cho, J., Min, K., & Park, I. (2015). Consequential validity of National Achievement in elementary schools. The Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation, 18(1), 135-154.
|
17 |
Choi, J., & Paik, S. (2015). A comparative analysis of achievement standards of the 2007 & 2009 Revised Elementary Science Curriculum with Next Generation Science Standards in US based on Bloom's revised taxonomy. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(2), 277-288.
DOI
|
18 |
Choi, W., & Jeong, E. (2008). Relationship between science achievement and student-related variable in National Assessment of Educational Achievement in 2006. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(8), 848-859.
|
19 |
Chung, B. (2009). A comparative study on the school differences in PISA 2006 science performance: Finland, Japan, Chinese Taipei, Hong Kong, and Korea. Korean Journal of Comparative Education, 19(2), 1-26.
|
20 |
Chung, Y., & Choi, J. (2007). An assessment of the scientific literacy of secondary school students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 27(1), 9-17.
|
21 |
Chung, W., Yoh, S., Park, J., & Kim, E. (1992). Evaluation of scientific inquiry skills for students of the special classroom(school) managed by firm. Journal of Science Education Kyungpook National University, 16, 1-17.
|
22 |
Cowie, B. (2012). Focusing on the classroom: Assessment for learning. In Fraser, B. J., Tobin, K. G., & McRobbie, C. J. (Eds). Second International Handbook of Science Education, Dadrecht; New York: Springer.
|
23 |
Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches(3rd ed.). CA: Sage Publications.
|
24 |
Davis, G. A., Rimm, S. B., & Siegle, D. (2011). Education of the gifted and talented(6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
|
25 |
Dong, H., Lee, I., & Shin, J. (2013). Characteristics of science achievement of Korean students in TIMSS 2011 and NAEA 2011. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 26(5), 1091-1114.
|
26 |
Duschl, R. (2008). Science education in three-part harmony: Balancing conceptual, epistemic, and social learning goals. Review of Research in Education, 32, 268-291.
DOI
|
27 |
Eisner, E. W. (1997). The promise and perils of alternative forms of data representation. Educational Researcher, 26(6), 4-10.
DOI
|
28 |
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2015). How to design and evaluate research in education (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
|
29 |
Fraser, Tobin, & McRobbie. (2012). Second international handbook of science education, Dadrecht; New York: Springer.
|
30 |
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg. W. R. (2007). Educational research(8th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
|
31 |
Ha, M., & Lee, J. (2013). The item response, generalizability, and structural validity for the translation of Science Motivation Questionnaire II (SMQII). Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 13(5), 1-18.
|
32 |
Holling, H., & Preckel, F. (2005). Self-estimates of intelligence methodological approaches and gender differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 503-517.
DOI
|
33 |
Huizinga, H. M., Crone, E. A., & Jansen, B. J. (2007). Decision-making in healthy children adolescents and adults explained by the use of increasingly complex proportional reasoning rules. Developmental Science, 10(6), 814-825.
DOI
|
34 |
Hwang, S., Kim, H., Yoo, J., & Park, S. (2001). Ninth grader's self assessment of scientific process skills in open investigation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 21(3), 506-515.
|
35 |
Jo, S., & Ku, J. (2013). An exploration in the measurement and application of attitude towards science based on social constructivism. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(2), 466-477.
DOI
|
36 |
Johnson, A. P. (2005). A short guide to action research (2nd ed.). Boston: Pearson.
|
37 |
Joo, H. (2000). A little idea of concept mapping evaluation method in construction option. The Journal of Elementary Education, 13(2), 221-237.
|
38 |
Kang, S., Park, E., Park, I., Yang, J., Lee, Y., Hong, H., & An, J. (2008). The analysis of the relationships between tests of the creative thinking and tests of the hypotheses generating ability. Journal of Research Institute of Curriculum Instruction, 12(1), 253-271.
DOI
|
39 |
Kim, D., & Hong, H. (2010). Measuring the effects of school science curriculum on students science outcomes based on PISA 2006 and comparing them with those of Finland. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(1), 87-112.
DOI
|
40 |
Kim, K., Kim, S., Kim, M., Kim, S. H., Kang, M., Park, H., & Jung, S. (2009). Comparative analysis of curriculum and achievement characteristics between Korea and high performing countries in PISA & TIMSS. Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
|
41 |
Kim, H. (2012). A research analysis for an alternative paradigm in christian education with a focus on research methodology. A Journal of Christian Education in Korea, 29, 347-377.
|
42 |
Kim, J., Kim, S., & Dong, H. (2015). International comparison of cognitive attributes using analysis on science results at TIMSS 2011 based on the cognitive diagnostic theory. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(2), 267-275.
DOI
|
43 |
Kim, M. (2002). The effect of portfolio assessment on the scientific investigation ability and science-related attitude of students in elementary school. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 15(1), 87-113.
|
44 |
Kim, R., Kim, G., & Kwon, N. (2012). Trends in research design and methods: Research on elementary and secondary mathematics curriculum. School Mathematics, 14(3), 395-408.
|
45 |
Kim, S., & Choi, T. (2008). Research methodology in education. Seoul: Hakjisa.
|
46 |
Kim, Y., Park, Y., Park, H., Shin, D., Jung, J., & Song, S. (2014). World of science education. Seoul: Book's hill.
|
47 |
Kim, Y., Yoon, K., & Kwon, D. (2010). Analysis of summative evaluation objectives in middle school biology based on Bloom's revised taxonomy of educational objectives. Journal of Science Education, 34(1), 164-174.
DOI
|
48 |
Koballa, T. R. (1988). Attitude and related concepts in science education. Science Education, 72(2), 115-126.
DOI
|
49 |
Krynowsky, B. (1988). Problems in assessing student attitude in science education: A partial solution. Science Education, 72(4), 575-584.
DOI
|
50 |
Ku, J., Han, J., & Kim, S. (2015). Effects of educational context variables on gender difference in science achievement among top performing countries of PISA 2012. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 28(5), 1381-1400.
|
51 |
Lawrenz, F., & Thao, M. (2014). Review of science education program evaluation. In Lederman, N. G., & Abell, S. K. (Eds). Handbook of Research on Science Education, volume II. New York: Routledge.
|
52 |
Lederman, N. G., Abell, S. K. (2014). Handbook of research on science education, volume II, New York: Routledge.
|
53 |
Lee, D., & Jeong, E. (2014). An analysis of paper and pencil test items of Life Science I in high school. Journal of Science Education, 38(3), 670-690.
DOI
|
54 |
Lee, H., Choi, K., & Nam, J. (2000). The effects of formative assessment with detailed feedback on students' science achievement, attitude, and interaction between teacher and students. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(3), 479-490.
|
55 |
Lee, Y., & Kim, E. (2013). Human characteristics and education. Hakjisa: Seoul.
|
56 |
Lee, J., Lee, I., & Kwon, Y. (2010). The development of the brain-based analysis framework for the evaluation of teaching-learning program in science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 30(5), 647-667.
|
57 |
Lee, S., Kim, J., & Jung, K. (2006). Potential of a self-report measure for intelligence. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 20(4), 931-953.
|
58 |
Leem, Y., Kim, Y. (2013). A historical study on the Korean Science Curriculum for the elementary and secondary schools. Biology Education, 41(3), 483-503.
DOI
|
59 |
Lim, J., Kang, S., Kong, Y., Choi, B., Nam, J. (2004). The development of instrument to assess high school students' views on Science-Technology-Society. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(6), 1143-1157.
|
60 |
Liu, X. (2012). Developing measurement instruments for science education research. In Fraser, B. J., Tobin, K. G., & McRobbie, C. J. (Eds). Second International Handbook of Science Education, Dadrecht; New York: Springer.
|
61 |
Lyon, E. (2011). Beliefs, practices, and reflection: Exploring a science teacher's classroom assessment through the assessment triangle model. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22, 417-435.
DOI
|
62 |
Miller, D. C. (1991). Handbook of research design and social measurement. Newbury Park. CA: Sage Publications.
|
63 |
Ministry of Culture and Education. (1981). Elementary education curriculum. Notification No. 1981-442 of MOCE. Seoul: MOCE.
|
64 |
Ministry of Culture and Education. (1987). Elementary education curriculum. Notification No. 87-9 of MOCE. Seoul: MOCE.
|
65 |
Ministry of Education. (1992). Elementary education curriculum. Notification No. 1992-16 of MOE. Seoul: MOE.
|
66 |
Ministry of Education. (1997a). Elementary education curriculum. Notification No. 1997-15 of MOE. Seoul: MOE.
|
67 |
Ministry of Education. (1997b). High school science curriculum reference book. Notification No. 1997-15 of MOE. Seoul: MOE.
|
68 |
Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development. (2007). Elementary education curriculum. Notification No. 2007-79 of MOEHRD. Seoul: MOEHRD.
|
69 |
Ministry of Education Science, and Technology. (2011). Science curriculum. Notification No. 2011-361 of MOEST. Seoul: MOEST.
|
70 |
Nam, J., Choi, J., Kong, Y., Moon, S., & Lee, S. (2004). The effects of feedback types in self assessment on the students's science concept understanding and science-related attitedes in the middle school science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 24(3), 646-658.
|
71 |
National Research Council. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, D. C.: Nationl Academy Press.
|
72 |
Neuman, W. L. (2011). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
|
73 |
Noh, T., Yoon, J., & Kang, S. (2009). The investigation of elementary school teachers' perceptions toward constructivist science assessment and their relationship with related variables. Journal of the Korean Society of Elementary Science Education, 28(3), 352-360.
|
74 |
Orpwood, G. (2001). The role of assessment in science curriculum reform. Assessment in Education, 8(2), 135-151.
DOI
|
75 |
Paik, S., Lee, E., Kim, J., Song, Y., Kim, Y., Chung, J., & Han, J. (2008). Analysis of the content validity of the achievement evaluation items on the "Water" chapter in the high school Chemistry I course. Journal of the Research Institute of Curriculum Instruction. 12(1), 55-65.
DOI
|
76 |
Park, D., Park, C., & Kim, S. (2001). The effect of school and school and student level background variables on math and science achievements in middle schools. Journal of Educational Evaluation. 14(1), 127-149.
|
77 |
Park, H., Bea, J., & Jo, K. (2012). Analysis of instructional and evaluational objectives in Chemistry I textbooks. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 56(4), 491-499.
DOI
|
78 |
Park, K. (2012). Analysis of research trends on gifted education in Korea. Journal of Gifted/Talented Education, 22(4), 823-840.
DOI
|
79 |
Park, S., & Yoo, J. (1999). Science performance assessment. The Korea Association of Yeolin Education, 7(1), 247-262.
|
80 |
Pellegrino, J. W. (2012). Assessment of science learning: Living in interesting times. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(6), 831-841.
DOI
|
81 |
Seo, Y., Kim, H., & Chae, H. (2010). Analysis of the end-of-chapter questions in Chemistry II according to revised Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 54(3), 329-337.
DOI
|