1 |
Alexopoulou, E., & Driver, R. (1996). Small-Group Discussion in Physics : Peer Interaction Modes in Pairs and Fours. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(10), 1099-1114.
DOI
|
2 |
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
|
3 |
Berland, L., & Lee, V. (2012). In pursuit of consensus: Disagreement and legitimization during small-group argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 34(12), 1857-1882.
DOI
|
4 |
Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007). Rethinking assessment in higher education. London: Kogan Page.
|
5 |
Cho, H., & Nam, J. (2014). The Impact of the Argument-based Modeling Strategy using Scientific Writing implemented in Middle School Science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(6), 583-592.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Clark, D., & Sampson, V. (2008). Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directions. Science Education, 92(3), 447-472.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-313.
DOI
|
8 |
Duschl, R., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39-72.
DOI
|
9 |
Duschl, R., Schweingruber, H., & Shouse, A. (Eds.). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
|
10 |
Erduran, S., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. (2007). Argumentation in science education: an overview. Argumentation in Science Education, 35, 3-27.
DOI
|
11 |
Fulwiler, B. (2008). Writing in science: How to scaffold instruction to support learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
|
12 |
Jang, K., Nam, J., & Choi, A. (2012). The Effects of Argument-Based Inquiry Using the Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) Approach on Argument Structure in Students' Writing. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(7), 1099-1108.
DOI
|
13 |
Hand, B., Choi, A., Greenbowe, T., Schroeder, J., & Bennett, W. (2008). Examining the impact of student use of multiple-mode representations in constructing science arguments. annual international conference of National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Baltimore, MD.
|
14 |
Hand, B., Hohenshell, L., & Prain, V. (2007). Examining the effect of multiple writing tasks on Year 10 biology students' understandings of cell and molecular biology concepts. Instructional Science, 35, 343 -373.
DOI
|
15 |
Hsi, S., & Hoadley, C. (1997). Productive Discussion in Science: Gender Equity Through Electronic Discourse. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 6(1), 23-36.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M., Rodriguez, M., & Duschl, R. (2000). "Doing the lesson" or "doing science": Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757-792.
DOI
|
17 |
Kelly, G., & Chen, C. (1999). The sound of music: Constructing science as a sociocultural practice through oral and written discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 883-915.
DOI
|
18 |
Kelly, G., & Takao, A. (2002). Epistemic levels in argument: an analysis of university oceanography students' use of evidence in writing. Science Education, 86(3), 314-342.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Kelly, G., Regev, J., & Prothero, W. (2007). Analysis of lines of reasoning in written argumentation. Argumentation in science education, 35, 137-157.
DOI
|
20 |
Keys, C., Hand, B., Prian, V., & Collins, S. (1999). Using the Science Writing Heuristic as a Tool for Learning from Laboratory Investigations in Secondary Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(10), 1065-1084.
DOI
|
21 |
Kiuhara, S., Graham, S., & Hweken, L. (2009). Teaching writing to high school students: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 136-160.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Kollar, I. & Fischer F. (2012). Peer assessment as collaborative learning: a cognitive perspective. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 344-348.
DOI
|
23 |
Kuhn, L., & Reiser, B. (2006). Structuring activities to foster argumentative discourse. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
|
24 |
Kulatunga, U., Moog, R., & Lewis, J. (2013). Argumentation and Participation Patterns in General Chemistry Peer-Led Sessions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(10), 1207-1231.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Kwon, J., & Nam, J. (2013). A Study on the Change of the Beginning Science Teachers' Beliefs About a Lesson and Teaching Practice in Argument-Based Inquiry Using Science Writing. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(7), 1329-1342.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
Larson, A., Britt, M., & Kurby, C. (2009). Improving students' evaluation of informal arguments. Journal of Experimental Education, 77(4), 339-366.
DOI
|
27 |
Li, L., Liu, X., & Steckelberg, A. (2010). Assessor or assessee: How student learning improves by giving and receiving peer feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 525-536.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Liu, E., Lin, S., Chiu, C., & Yuan, S. (2001). Web-based peer review: The learner as both adapter and reviewer. IEEE Transactions on Education, 44(3), 246-251.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
Nam, J., Kwak, K., Jang, K., & Hand, B. (2008). The implementation of argumentation using Science Writing Heuristic (SWH) in Middle School Science. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(8), 922-936.
|
30 |
Nam, J., Koh, M., Bak, D., Lim, J., Lee, D. & Choi, A. (2011). The Effects of Argumentation-based General Chemistry Laboratory on Preservice Science Teachers' Understanding of Chemistry Concepts and Writing. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(8), 1077-1091.
|
31 |
Nam, J., Lee, D., & Cho, H. (2011). The Impact of Argumentation-based General Chemistry Laboratory Programs on Multimodal Representation and Embeddedness in University Students' Science Writing. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 31(6), 931-941.
|
32 |
National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
|
33 |
National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
|
34 |
National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
|
35 |
National Research Council. (2013). The next generation science standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
|
36 |
Osborne, J. (2002). Science without literacy:Aship without a sail? Cambridge Journal of Education, 32, 203-215.
DOI
|
37 |
Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe. London: Nuffield Foundation.
|
38 |
Poock, J., Burke, K., Greenbowe, T., & Hand, B. (2007). Using the science writing heuristic in the general chemistry laboratory to improve students academic performance. Journal of Chemical Education, 84, 1371-1378.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
39 |
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simmon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 41(10), 994-1020.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
40 |
Phillips, L., & Norris, S. (1999). Interpreting popular reports of science: What happens when the readers' world meets the world on paper?. International Journal of Science Education, 21(3), 317-327.
DOI
|
41 |
Prain, V., & Hand, B. (1996). Writing for learning in secondary science: Rethinking practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(3), 179-201.
|
42 |
Purchase, H. (2000). Learning about interface design through peer assessment. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 27(4), 341-352.
|
43 |
Rust, C., Price, M., & O'Donovan, B. (2003). Improving students' learning by developing their understanding of assessment criteria and processes. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(2), 147-164.
DOI
|
44 |
Sampson, V., Enderle, P., Grooms, J., & Witte, S. (2013). Writing to Learn by Learning to Write During the School Science Laboratory: Helping Middle and High School Students Develop Argumentative Writing Skills as They Learn Core Ideas. Science Education, 97(5), 643-670.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
45 |
Sandoval, W., & Reiser, B. (2004). Explanation driven inquiry: Integrating conceptual and epistemic scaffolds for scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(3), 345-372.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
46 |
Smyth, K. (2004). The benefits of students learning about critical evaluation rather than being summatively judged. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(3), 369-378.
|
47 |
Xiao, Y., & Lucking, R. (2008). The impact of two types of peer assessment on students' performance and satisfaction within a Wiki environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 186-193.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
48 |
Spiller, D. (2009). Assessment matters: Self assessment and peer assessment. New Zealand: University of Waikato.
|
49 |
Tavares, M., Jimenez-Aleixandre, M., & Mortimer, E. (2010). Articulation of conceptual knowledge and argumentation practices by high school students in evolution problems. Science & Education, 19(6-8), 573-598.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
50 |
Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
51 |
Yore, L., Bisanz, G., & Hand, B. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689-725.
DOI
|