Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.1.0169

Analysis of Students' Socioscientific Decision-Making from the Nature of Technology Perspectives  

Lee, Hyunok (Ewha Womans University)
Lee, Hyunju (Ewha Womans University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.35, no.1, 2015 , pp. 169-177 More about this Journal
Abstract
Since socioscientific issues (SSI) reflect various characteristics of new technologies designed to meet the incessant human needs in the contemporary society, this study explores the feasibility of adapting nature of technology (NOT) to analyze students' socioscientific decision-making. To achieve the aim, forty-five college students enrolled in a liberal arts course on science and technology studies participated in the study and responded to a GMO (golden rice) scenario in a written form. Four major viewpoints were identified from their writing: 1) is the technological artifact able to solve a societal problem?, 2) are there some alternatives to solve the societal problem?, 3) what kinds of side effects or flaws could turn up during distribution and consumption of the technological artifact?, and 4) can we cope with the technological uncertainty? We revisited the viewpoints within the NOT framework (technology as a 'fix,' cultural context and role of values, technological trade-offs, technology as a system, and technological progression). As a result, unlike NOS, NOT were quite explicitly represented in their decision-making and students' level of understanding on NOT varied. It indicates that NOT can be a promising construct for cultivating informed SSI decision-making.
Keywords
nature of science; socioscientific issues; SSI decision-making; nature of technology;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Albe, V. (2008). When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: Students' argumentation in group discussions on a socio-scientific issue. Research in Science Education, 38(1), 67-90.   DOI
2 Arthur, W. B. (2009). The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves: Free Press. New York.
3 Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87(3), 352-377.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Chang, H., & Lee, H. (2010). College students' decision-making tendencies in the context of socioscientific issues (SSI). Journal of Korean Association in Science Education, 31(1), 14-31.
5 Clough, M. P. (2013). Teaching about the nature of technology: Issues and pedagogical practices. In M. P. Clough, J. K. Olson, & D. S. Niederhauser (Eds.). The nature of technology: Implications for learning and teaching (pp. 373-390). Sense Publishers. Netherlands.
6 Eastwood, J. L., Sadler, T. D., Zeidler, D. L., Lewis, A., Amiri, L., & Applebaum, S. (2012). Contextualizing nature of science instruction in socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(15), 2289-2315.   DOI
7 Grace, M. M., & Ratcliffe, M. (2002). The science and values that young people draw upon to make decisions about biological conservation issues. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1157-1169.   DOI
8 Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645-670.   DOI
9 Hong, S. (2010) The latest trend in sociology of technology. In Philosophy of Science Education Committee in Hanyang Univ. (Ed.), Philosophical understanding of science and technology, (pp. 91-107). Hanyang University Press. Seoul.
10 Hughes, T. P. (2012). The evolution of large technological Systems. In W. E. Bijker, T. P. Hughes, T. Pinch & D. G. Douglas (Eds.), The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology (pp. 45-74). MIT Press. Cambridge.
11 Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359.   DOI
12 International Technology Education Association (2000). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. International Technology Education Association. Virginia.
13 Khishfe, R. (2012). Nature of science and decision-making. International Journal of Science Education, 34(1), 67-100.   DOI
14 Kruse, J. W. (2013). Implications of the nature of technology for teaching and teacher education. In M. P. Clough, J. K. Olson, & D. S. Niederhauser (Eds.). The nature of technology: Implications for learning and teaching, (pp. 345-369). Sense Publishers. Netherlands.
15 Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497-521.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage. London.
17 National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. National Academies Press. Washington, DC.
18 Pacey, A. (1983). The culture of technology: MIT Press. Cambridge.
19 Roberts, D.A., & Bybee, R.W. (2014). Scientific literacy, science literacy, and science education. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, Volume II (pp. 545-558). New York, NY: Routledge.
20 Roth, W.-M., & Lee, S. (2004) Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88(2), 263-294.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Sadler, T., Barab, S., & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371-391.   DOI
22 Sadler, T. D., Chambers, F. W., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 387-409.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Volti, R. (2013). Society and Technological Change: Worth Publishers. New York, NY.
24 Waight, N. (2013). Technology knowledge: High school science teachers' conceptions of the nature of technology. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. 11(5), 1-26.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Waight, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Nature of technology: Implications for design, development, and enactment of technological tools in school science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 34(18), 2875-2905.   DOI
26 Walker, K. A., & Zeidler, D. L. (2007). Promoting discourse about socioscientific issues through scaffolded inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1387-1410.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Zeidler, D. L. (2003). The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education. Kluwer Academic Publishers. Netherlands.
28 Zeidler, D.L. (2014). Socioscientific issues as a curriculum emphasis: Theory, research and practice. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, Volume II (pp. 697-726). Routledge. New York, NY.
29 Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357-377.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49-58.   DOI
31 Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86(3), 343-367.   DOI   ScienceOn