Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.4.0335

Student Understanding of Scale: From Additive to Multiplicative Reasoning in the Constriction of Scale Representation by Ordering Objects in a Number Line  

Park, Eun-Jung (Ewha Womans University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.34, no.4, 2014 , pp. 335-347 More about this Journal
Abstract
Size/scale is a central idea in the science curriculum, providing explanations for various phenomena. However, few studies have been conducted to explore student understanding of this concept and to suggest instructional approaches in scientific contexts. In contrast, there have been more studies in mathematics, regarding the use of number lines to relate the nature of numbers to operation and representation of magnitude. In order to better understand variations in student conceptions of size/scale in scientific contexts and explain learning difficulties including alternative conceptions, this study suggests an approach that links mathematics with the analysis of student conceptions of size/scale, i.e. the analysis of mathematical structure and reasoning for a number line. In addition, data ranging from high school to college students facilitate the interpretation of conceptual complexity in terms of mathematical development of a number line. In this sense, findings from this study better explain the following by mathematical reasoning: (1) varied student conceptions, (2) key aspects of each conception, and (3) potential cognitive dimensions interpreting the size/scale concepts. Results of this study help us to understand the troublesomeness of learning size/scale and provide a direction for developing curriculum and instruction for better understanding.
Keywords
size and scale; number; multiplicative reasoning; operation;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Evans, K. L., Yaron, D., & Leinhardt, G. (2008). Learning stoichiometry: a comparison of text and multimedia formats. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(3), 208-218.   DOI
2 Fauvel, J. (1995). Revisiting the history of logarithms. Learn from the Masters, 39-48.
3 Fischbein, E., Deri, M., Nello, M. S., & Marino, M. S. (1985). The role of implicit models in solving verbal problems in multiplication and division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16 (1), 3-17.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Guckin, A. M., & Morrison, D. (1991). Math*Logo: A project to develop proportional reasoning in college freshmen. School Science and Mathematics, 91(2), 77-81.   DOI
5 Hart, K. M. Brown, M. L., Kuchemann, D. E., Kerslake, D., Ruddock, G., & McCartney, M. (1981). Children's understanding of mathematics: 11-16. London: John Murray.
6 Hines, E., & McMahon, M. T. (2005). Interpreting middle school students' proportional reasoning strategies: Observations from preservice teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 105(2), 88-105.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Hodson, D. (1985). Philosophy of science, science and science education. Studies in Science Education, 12(1), 25-57.   DOI
8 Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 201-217.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
10 Jang, M., & Park, M. (2006). A study on the multiplicative thinking of 2nd grade elementary students. Communications of Mathematical Education. Series E, 20(3), 443-467.   과학기술학회마을
11 Jones, M. G., Taylor, A., & Broadwell, B. (2009). Concepts of scale held by students with visual impairment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(5), 506-519.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Jones, M. G., Taylor, A., Minogue, J., Broadwell, B., Wiebe, E., and Carter, G. (2006). Understanding scale: Powers of ten. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(2), 191-202.
13 Kadosh, R., Tzelgov, J., & Henik, A. (2008). A synthetic walk on the mental number line: The size effect. Cognition, 106, 548-557.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Kamii, C., & Livingston, S. (1994). Young children continue to reinvent arithmetic, 3rdgrade. New York: Teachers College Press.
15 Kim, J., & Bang, J. (2013). An analysis on third graders' multiplicative thinking and proportional reasoning ability. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 23(1), 1-16.
16 Akatugba, A. H., & Wallace, J. (2009). An integrative perspective on students' proportional reasoning in high school physics in a West African context. International Journal of Science Education, 31(11), 1473-1493.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 An, S. (2008). A survey on the proportional reasoning ability of fifth, sixth, and seventh graders. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 18(1), 103-121.
18 Angell, C., Kind, P. M., Henriksen, E. K., & Guttersrud, O. (2008). An empirical-mathematical modelling approach to upper secondary physics. Physics Education, 43(3), 256-264.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Bar. V. (1987). Comparison of the development of ratio concepts in two domains. Science Education, 71(4), 599-613.   DOI
20 Beland, A., & Mislevy, R. J. (1996). Probability-based inference in a domain of proportional reasoning tasks. Journal of Educational Measurement, 33(1), 3-27.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Ben-Chaim, D., Fey, J. T., Fitzgerald, W. M., Benedetto, C., & Miller, J. (1998). Proportional reasoning among 7thgrade students with different curricular experiences. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 36(3), 247-273.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Booth, J. L., & Siegler, R. S. (2006). Developmental and individual differences in pure numerical estimation. Developmental Psychology, 41(6), 189-201.
23 Booth, J. L., & Siegler, R. S. (2008). Numerical magnitude representations influence arithmetic learning. Child Development, 79(4), 1016-1031.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Cheek, K. A. (2010). Why is geologic time troublesome knowledge? In J. H. F. Meyer, R. Land, & C. Baillie (Eds.), Threshold concepts and transformational learning (pp.117-129). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
25 Clark, F., & Kamii, C. (1996). Identification of multiplicative thinking in children in grades 1-5. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(1), 41-51.   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Akatugba, A. H., & Wallace, J. (1999). Sociocultural influences on physics students' use of proportional reasoning in a non-western country. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(3), 305-320.   DOI
27 Dawkins, K. R., Dickerson, D. L., McKinney, S. E., & Butler, S. (2008). Teaching density to middle school students: Preservice science teachers' content knowledge and pedagogical practices. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues, and Ideas, 82(1), 21-26.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 De Lozano, S. R., & Cardenas, M. (2002). Some learning problems concerning the use of symbolic language in physics. Science Education, 11, 589-599.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Dehaene, S. (2011). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. (Revised & Expanded Edition), New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
30 Drane, D., Swarat, S., Light, G., Hersam, M., & Mason, T. (2009). An evaluation of the efficacy and transferability of a nanoscience module. Journal of Nano Education, 1(1), 8-14.   DOI
31 Smith, C., Maclin, D., Grosslight, L., & Davis, H. (1997). Teaching for understanding: a study of students' pre-instruction theories of matter and a comparison of the effectiveness of two approaches to teaching about matter and density. Cognition and Instruction, 15(3). 317-393.   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Stevens, S., Sutherland, L., Schank, P., & Krajcik, J. (2009). The big ideas of nanoscale science & engineering: A guidebook for secondary teachers. NSTA Press.
33 Streefland, L. (1984). Search for the roots of ratio: Some thoughts on the long term learning process (Towards... a theory). Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15(4), 327-348.   DOI
34 Swarat, S., Light, G., Park, E-J., & Drane, D. (2011). A typology of undergraduate students' conceptions of size and scale: Identifying and characterizing conceptual variation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(5), 512-533.   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Taber, K. S. (2006). Conceptual integration: a demarcation criterion for science education?. Physics Education, 41(4), 286-287.   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Thompson, P. W. (1994). The development of the concept of speed and its relationship to concepts of rate. The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp179-234). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
37 Trend, R. (2000). Conceptions of geological time among primary teacher trainees, with reference to their engagement with geosciences, history, and science. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 539-555.   DOI
38 Tretter, T. R., Jones, M. G., & Minogue, J. (2006). Accuracy of scale conceptions in science: Mental maneuverings across many orders of spatial magnitude. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(10), 1061-1085.   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Tourniaire, F., & Pulos, S. (1985). Proportional reasoning: A review of the literature. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 16,181-204.   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Tretter, T. R., Jones, M. G., Andre, T., Negishi, A., & Minogue, J. (2006). Conceptual boundaries and distances: Students' and experts' concepts of the scale of scientific phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(3), 282-319.   DOI   ScienceOn
41 Vergnaud, G. (1983). Multiplicative structures. In R. Lesh, & M. Landau (Eds.), Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp. 127-174). New York: Academic Press.
42 Wagner, E. P. (2001). A study comparing the efficacy of a mole ratio flow chart to dimensional analysis for teaching reaction stoichiometry. School Science and Mathematics, 101(1), 10-22.   DOI
43 Weber, K. (2002). Developing students' understanding of exponents and logarithms. ERIC Documents, 471-763.
44 Zen, E.-A. (2001). What is deep time and why should anyone care? Journal of Geoscience Education, 49(1), 5-9.   DOI
45 Piaget, J. (1987). Possibility and necessity: The role of possibility in cognitive development. Minneapolis, MN: The University of Minnesota Press.
46 Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2006). An exploratory study of teachers' and students' use of multi-modal representations of concepts in primary science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1843-1866.   DOI   ScienceOn
47 Redlich, O. (1970). Intensive and extensive properties. Journal of Chemical Education, 47(2), 154-156
48 Sanders, M., Kwon, H., Park, K., & Lee, H. (2011). Integrative STEM education: contemporary trends and issues. Secondary Education Research, 59(3), 729-762.   DOI
49 Reys, R. E., Lindquist, M. M., Lambdin, D. V., & Smith, N. L. (2009). Helping children learn mathematics. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
50 Rizvi, N. F., & Lawson, M. J. (2007). Prospective teachers' knowledge: concept of division. International Education Journal, 8(2), 377-392.
51 Sheppard, K. (2006). High school students' understanding of titrations and related acid-base phenomena. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(1), 32-45.   DOI
52 Siegler, R. S., & Opfer, J. (2003). The developmental of numerical estimation: Evidence for multiple representations of numerical quantity. Psychological Science, 14(3), 237-243.   DOI   ScienceOn
53 Siegler, R. S., Thompson, C. A., & Opfer, J. E. (2009). The logarithmic to linear shift: One learning sequence, many tasks, many time scales. Mind, Brain, and Education, 3(3), 143-150.   DOI   ScienceOn
54 Siemon, D., Breed, M., & Virgona, J. (2006). From additive to multiplicative thinking-The big challenge of the middle years. www.education.vic.gov.au/studentlearning/teachingresources/maths/
55 Siemon, D., & Virgona, J. (2001). Road maps to numeracy-Reflections on the middle years numeracy research project. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Fremantle, WA.
56 Sin, Y., & Han, S. (2011). A study of the elementary school teachers' perception in STEAM Education. Elementary Science Education, 30(4), 514-523.
57 Adjiage, R., & Pluvinage, F. (2007). An experiment in teaching ratio and proportion. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 65, 149-175.   DOI
58 Singer, J. A., & Resnick, L. B. (1992). Representations of proportional relationships: Are children part-part or part-whole reasoners? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23(3), 231-246.   DOI
59 Singh, P. (2000). Understanding the concepts of proportion and ratio constructed by two grade six students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43(3), 271-292.   DOI   ScienceOn
60 Smith, E., & Confrey, J. (1994). Multiplicative structures and the development of logarithms: What was lost by the invention of function? In G. J. Harel, & J, Confrey (Eds.) The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp333-364). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
61 Kohn, A. S. (1993). Preschoolers' reasoning about density: Will it float? Child Development, 64, 1637-1650.   DOI   ScienceOn
62 Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity. 2009 -Revised national curriculum.
63 Lamon, S. J. (1993). Ratio and proportion: Connecting content and children's thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(1), 41-61.   DOI   ScienceOn
64 Lamon, S. J. (1994). Ratio and proportion: Cognitive foundations in unitizing and norming. In G. J. Harel, & J, Confrey (Eds.) The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 89-122). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
65 National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, D. C: National Academy Press.
66 Lee, H., Son, D., Kwon, H., Park, K., Han, I., Jeong, H., Lee, S., Oh, H., & Nam, J. (2012). Secondary teachers' perceptions and needs analysis on integrative STEM education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 32(1), 30-45.   DOI
67 Lindquist, M. (1989). Results from the fourth mathematics assessment of the national assessment of educational progress. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
68 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/standards/content.aspx?id=16909
69 Noelting, G. (1980). The development of proportional reasoning and the ratio concept Part I-Differentiation of stages. Educational studies in Mathematics, 11(2), 217-253.   DOI
70 O'Brien, T., & Casey, S. (1983). Children learning multiplication. School Science and Mathematics. 83, 246-251   DOI
71 Oon, P. T., & Subramaniam, R. (2011). On the declining interest in physics among students-from the perspective of teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 33(5), 727-746.   DOI   ScienceOn
72 Park, E-J., & Choi, K. (2010). Analysis of mathematical structure to identify students' understanding of a scientific concept: pH value and scale. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 30(7), 920-932.
73 Erickson, T. (2006). Stealing from physics: modeling with mathematical functions in data-rich contexts. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 25(1), 23-32.   DOI
74 Hart, K. M. (1988). Ratio and proportion. In J. Hiebert, & M. Behr (Eds.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp.198-219). Reston, VA: National Council of Teacher of Mathematics.
75 Lesh, R., Post, R., & Behr, M. (1988). Proportional reasoning. In J. M. Hiebert Behr (Ed.), Number concepts and operations in the middle grades (pp. 93-118). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.