Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.7.1471

Development of the Heuristic Attention Model Based on Analysis of Eye Movement of Elementary School Students on Discrimination task  

Shin, Won-Sub (Seoul National University of Education)
Shin, Dong-Hoon (Seoul National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.33, no.7, 2013 , pp. 1471-1485 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop a HAM (Heuristic Attention Model) by analyzing the difference between eye movements according to the science achievement of elementary school students on discrimination task. Science achievement was graded by the results of the Korea national achievement test conducted in 2012 for a random sampling of classes. As an assessment tool to check discrimination task, two discrimination measure problems from TSPS (Test of Science Process Skill, developed in 1994) which were suitable for an eye tracking system were adopted. The subjects of this study were 20 students from the sixth grade who agreed to participate in the research. SMI was used to collect EMD (eye movement data). Experiment 3.2 and BeGaze 3.2 programs were used to plan experiments and analyze EMD. As a result, eye movements of participants in discrimination tasks varied greatly in counts and duration of fixation, first fixation duration, and dwell time, according to students' science achievement and difficulty of the problems. By the analysis of EMD, strategies of the students' problem-solving could be found. During problem solving, subjects' eye movements were affected by visual attention; bottom-up attention, top-down attention and convert attention, and aflunter attention. In conclusion, HAM was developed, and it is believed to help in the development of a science learning program for underachievers.
Keywords
heuristic attention model; bottom-up; top-down; cognitive load;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 9  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 권재술, 김범기(1994). 초.중학생들의 과학탐구능력 측정도구의 개발. 한국과학교육학회지, 14(3), 251-264.
2 박민철, 최경주(2005). 모션 기반 선택적 주의 시스템. 한국콘텐츠학회지, 5(6), 87-96.   과학기술학회마을
3 박상재, 신장규, 이민호(2002). 독립성분해석 알고리즘을 이용한 칼라영상에서의 상향식 선택적 주의 집중 시각 모델. 경북대학교 센서기술연구소, 13(1), 150-154.
4 손영숙, 이현구, 옥애니, 김민식(2003). 선택적 주의와 관점의 변화가 무의미 도형의 재인에 미치는 영향. 한국심리학회지, 15(2), 259-274.
5 신동훈(2006). 생물학 가설 생성에서 나타나는 과학적 감성의 생성 과정 설명을 위한 신경 인지적 모형 개발. 한국생물교육학회지, 34(2), 232-245.
6 신원섭, 신동훈(2012). 초등 교사들의 과학교과서 그래프 이해 과정에 대한 안구 운동 분석. 초등과학교육, 31(3), 386-397.   과학기술학회마을
7 신원섭, 신동훈(2013). 관찰 문제에서 초등학생의 과학 학업성취도에 따른 안구운동 분석. 초등과학교육, 32(2), 185-197.
8 신원섭, 신동훈, 전영석(2013). UX관점에서 Eyetracking을 이용한 교육용 게임 UI연구. 정보교육학회논문지, 17(2), 211-224.
9 이민호(2009). 선택적 주의집중 인공시각 시스템. 전자공학회지, 36(11), 52-65.   과학기술학회마을
10 이유부, 이석한(2013). 상향식 돌출과 하향식 단서 결합 기반 시각주의를 이용한 얼굴검출. 정보과학학회지, 40(2), 99-107.
11 정범수, 이민호(2004). 인체의 상향식 선택적 주의 집중 시각 기능을 모방한 능동 스테레오 감시 시스템의 개발. 한국센서학회지, 13(2), 144-151.   과학기술학회마을   DOI   ScienceOn
12 조인수(1998). 시각변별과제 전이조작에 따른 정신지체아의 선택적 주의집중과 학업성취수준 변화. 발달장애학회지, 2, 1-14.
13 최경주, 박민철(2011). 인간의 주의시각에 기반한 시각정보 선택방법. 멀티미디어학회지, 14(3), 378-391.
14 최경주, 이일병(2005). 인간의 시각적 주의 특성에 바탕을 둔 현저한 영역 탐지. 정보과학학회지 : 소프트웨어 및 응용, 31(2), 189-202.   과학기술학회마을
15 최민영(2003) 사용자의 시각적 인지 특성에 기초한 시선 추적 분석 방법에 대한 연구. 디자인학연구, 16(4), 197-206.
16 최현동, 신원섭, 신동훈(2012). 초등과학영재와 일반 아동의 분류 과정에서 나타나는 안구 운동 패턴의 차이. 초등과학교육, 31(4), 501-512.   과학기술학회마을
17 Choi, S. B., Ban, S. W., & L, M. (2004). Human-Like Selective Attention Model with Reinforcement and Inhibition Mechanism. Neural Information Processing Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3316, 694-699.
18 Cook, M., Wiebe, E. N., & Carter, G. (2011). Comparing visual representation of DNA in two multimedia presentations. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 20(1), 21-42.
19 Corbetta, M., Shulman, G. L., Miezin, F. M., & Petersen, S. E. (1995), Superior cortex activation during spatial attention shifts and visual feature conjunction. Science 270, 802-805.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Goldberg, J. H., & Kotval, X. P. (1999). Computer interface evaluation using eye movements: Methods and constructs. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 24(6), 631-645.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Haciomeroglu, E. S., & Chicken, E. (2012). Visual thinking and gender differences in high school calculus. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science & Technology. 43(3), 303-313.   DOI
22 Henderson, J. M. (1992). Visual attention and eye movement control during reading and picture viewing. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements and visual cognition: scene perception and reading (pp. 260-283). New York: Springer-Verlag.
23 Holmqvist, K., NystrOm, M., Anderson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., & van de Weijer, J. (2011). Eye tracking : A comprehensive guide to methods and measures, pp. 9-144. Oxford University Press.
24 Itti, L., Koch, C., & Niebur, E. (1998). A model of saliencybased visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Trans. Patt. Anal. Mach. Intell, 20(11), 1254-1259.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Liu, C. J., & Shen, M. H. (2011). The influence of different representations on solving concentration problems at elementary school. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20, 621-629.   DOI
26 Moore, T., & Fallah, M. (2001). Control of eye movements and visual attention. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA. 98, 1273-1276.   DOI
27 Muller, H. J., & Krummenacher, J. (2006). Visual search and selective attention. VISUAL COGNITION, 14(4/5/6/7/8), 389-410.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Navalpakkam, V., & Itti, L. (2002) A Goal Oriented Attention Guidance Model. Biologically Motivated Computer Vision Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2525, 453-461.
29 Rauthmann, J. F., Seubert, C. T., Sachse, P., & Furtner, M. R. (2012). Eyes as windows to the soul: Gazing behavior is related to personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 147-156.   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Senso Motoric Instruments. (2011a). BeGaze Manual version 3.1.
31 Senso Motoric Instruments. (2011b). iView XTM Manual.
32 Slykhuis, D. A., Wiebe, E. N., & Annetta, L. A. (2005). Eyetracking students’attention to powerpoint photo- graphs in science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(6), 509-520.   DOI
33 Snowden, R., Tnompson, P., & Troscianko, T. (2011). Basic vision : An introduction to visual perception. 오성주 역, 학지사, 2013.
34 Tang, H., & Pienta, N. (2012). Eye-Tracking Study of Complexity in Gas Law Problems. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(8), 988-994.   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A Feature-integration Theory of Attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Treisman, A. (1986). Features and objects in visual processing. Scientific American 255, November, 106-115.
37 Tsai, M. J., Hou, H. T., Lai, M. L., Liu, W. Y., & Yang, F. Y. (2012). Visual attention for solving multiple- choice science problem: An eye- tracking analysis. Computer & Education, 58, 375-385.   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Tsotsos, J. K., Culhane, S. M., Wai, W., Lai, Y., Davis, N., & Nuflo, F. (1995). Modeling visual attention via selective tuning. Artificial Intelligence, 78, 507-545.   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Review: Neuroscience, 5(6), 495-501.   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(2), 202-238.   DOI   ScienceOn
41 Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(3), 419-433.   DOI   ScienceOn