Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.7.1354

Analysis of the Types of Teachers' Questioning in Verification Laboratory Instruction and Discovery Laboratory Instruction  

Kim, O-Beom (Korea National University of Education)
An, Un-Ha (Korea National University of Education)
Kim, Eun-Ae (Korea National University of Education)
Ko, Min-Seok (Korea National University of Education)
Yang, Ilho (Korea National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.33, no.7, 2013 , pp. 1354-1366 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze the types of teachers' questioning between verification laboratory instruction and discovery laboratory instruction. Results were that there was no difference in questioning types in verification laboratory instruction and discovery laboratory instruction. Most teachers in two types of laboratory instruction used closed questionings more than open-ended questioning. This shows that teachers' laboratory instruction processes are focusing on 'get the content' rather than consideration of the characteristics of laboratory instruction types. Such results show that the teachers in verification laboratory instruction and discovery laboratory instruction provide little opportunity for children to improve in scientific thinking. Therefore, teachers should make good plans with a questioning strategy that can be adapted to the types and characteristic of laboratory instruction. If teacher's questioning is practiced well in the science class, it can improve students' scientific thinking and science laboratory instruction.
Keywords
verification laboratory instruction; discovery laboratory instruction; questioning;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 성태제(2007). 타당도와 신뢰도(제2판). 서울: 학지사, pp. 154-163.
2 양일호, 김석민, 조현준(2007a). 초.중등학교 실험 수업의 유형 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 27(3), 235-241.
3 양일호, 정진우, 허명, 김석민(2006a). 실험수업 유형 분류틀 개발. 한국과학교육학회지, 26(3), 342-355.   과학기술학회마을
4 양일호, 정진우, 허명, 김영신, 김진수, 조현준, 오창호 (2006b). 초등학교 과학 실험 수업 분석. 초등과학교육, 25(3), 281-295.   과학기술학회마을
5 양일호, 조현준, 유영란(2007b). 확인실험수업에서 나타나는 초등교사들의 교수 행동 절차 분석. 초등과학교육, 26(4), 418-427.
6 조연순, 우재경(1998). 초등 과학 수업에서 교사의 발문과 반응 유형 분석. 교육과학연구, 27, 51-69.
7 Blosser, P. E. (1991). How to ask the right questions [electronic resource]. NSTA
8 Chin, C. (2006). Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students'responses. International Journal of Science Education, 28(11), 1315-1346.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815-843.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 D'Andrade, R. G., & Wish, M. (1985). Speech act theory in quantitative research on interpersonal behavior. Discourse Processes, 8(2), 229-259.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Domin, D. S. (1999). A review of laboratory instruction styles. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4), 543-547.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Erdogan, I., & Campbell, T. (2008). Teacher questioning and interaction patterns in classrooms facilitated with differing levels of constructivist teaching practices. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1891-1914.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Gallagher, J. J. (1965). Productive thinking of gifted children. U. S. Office of education, department of health, education and welfare, cooperative research project No. 965. Urbana: University of Illinois.
14 Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American educational research journal, 31(1), 104-137.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Koufetta-Menicou, C., & Scaife, J. (2000). Teachers' Questions--Types and Significance in Science Education. School Science Review, 81(296), 79-84.
16 Harlen, W. (1999). Effective Teaching of Science. A Review of Research. Using Research Series, 21. Scottish Council for Research in Education, 15 St. John Street, Edinburgh EH8 8JR, Scotland.
17 Harwood, W. S., Reiff, R., & Phillipson, T. (2002). Scientist' conceptions of scientific inquiry: Vocies from the grant. Proceeding of the Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science.
18 Hodson, D. (2004). Practical work in school science: Exploring some directions for change. International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), 755-760.
19 Lehnert, W. G., & Lehnert, W. G. (1978). The process of question answering: A computer simulation of cognition. L. Erlbaum Associates.
20 Millar, R., Le Marehal, J. F., & Tiberghien, A. (1998). A map of the variety of labwork. Labwork in Science Education-Working Paper, 1.
21 Penick, J. E., Crow, L. W., & Bonnsteter, R. J. (1996). Questions are the answers. The Science Teacher, 63(1), 26-29.
22 Sahin, A. (2007). Teachers'classroom questions. School Science and Mathematics, 107(1), 369-370.   DOI
23 Van Zee, E., & Minstrell, J. (1997). Using questioning to guide student thinking. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 6(2), 227-269.   DOI   ScienceOn