1 |
Driver, R., Leach, J., Miller, R. & Scott, P. (1996). Young people's image of science. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
|
2 |
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-313
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Giere, R. N. (1991). Understanding scientific reasoning (3rd ed.). Fourth Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
|
4 |
Hodson, D. (1996). Practical work in school science: Exploring some directions for change. International Journal of Science Education, 18(7), 755-760.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Hug, B. & McNeill, K. L. (2008). Use of first-hand and second-hand data in science: Does data type influence classroom conversations? International Journal of Science Education, 30(13), 1725-1751.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M., Rodriguez, M., & Duschl, R. A. (2000)". Doing the lesson"or" doing science": Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757 792
|
7 |
Kelly, G. J. & Takao, A. (2002). Epistemic levels in argument : an analysis of university oceanography students' use of evidence in writing. Science Education, 86(3). 314- 342.
|
8 |
Kelly, G. J., Drucer, S. & Chen, C. (1998). Students' reasoning about electricity: combining performance assessments with argumentation analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 20(7), 849-871.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Kind, P. M., Kind, V., Hofstein, A., & Wilson, J. (2012). Peer argumentation in the school science laboratoryexploring effects of task features. International Journal of Science Education, 33(18), 2527-2558.
|
10 |
National Research Council (1996). National Science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
|
11 |
National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the National Science education standards: A Guide for Teaching and Learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
|
12 |
Newton, P., Dirver, R., & Osborne, J. (1999). The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(5), 553-576.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Pera, M. (1994). The discourse of Science. trans. C. Botsford. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
|
14 |
Schauble, L. Klopfer, L. E., & Raghavan, K. (1991). Students'transition form an engineering model to a science model of experiment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 859-882.
DOI
|
15 |
Schauble, L., Glaser, R., Duschl, R. A., Schulze, S., & John, J. (1995). Students'understanding of the objectives and procedure of experimentation in the science classroom. The Journal of The Learning Sciences, 4(2), 131-166.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Toulmin, S. (1958). The use of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
|
17 |
Walton, D. M. (1990). What is reasoning? What is an argument? The Journal of Philosophy, 87, 399-419.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Watson, J. R., Swain, J. R. L., & McRobbie, C. (2004). Students'discussion in practical scientific inquiries. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 24-45.
|