Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.2.310

Development and Analysis of Various Activity Types for Teaching Scientific Creativity  

Park, Jongwon (Chonnam National University)
Kim, Jinkuk (Chonnam National University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.33, no.2, 2013 , pp. 310-327 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study aims to develop teaching materials for scientific creativity and to introduce it in more detail. To do this, based on the analysis of the previous studies, we developed about 80 activities in five categories. Main features of the developed materials are as follows: (1) it covers various areas of creativity, (2) each activity includes elements of scientistic creativity, (3) each activity includes guides for thinking creatively and instances of the guides, (4) these guides are categorized to be utilized in other situations for teaching creativity, (5) the activities can be transformed according to actual teaching situations. The teachers gave responses that materials were appropriate to teach scientific creativity and that they wanted to use the materials in schools. And based on the teachers' response about the advantages, disadvantages, and conditions for more effective use of the materials, we hope that further studies for actual use and revisions on the materials will be conducted. Finally, we suggested various methods to use the developed activities for different purposes and educational situations.
Keywords
scientific creativity; teaching creativity; teaching material; element of scientific creativity;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Radford, D.L. (1998). Transferring theory into practice: A model for professional development for science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(1), 73- 88.   DOI
2 Renzulli, J.S (2000). New Directions in Creativity: Mark 2. CT: Creative Learning Press, Inc.
3 Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 905-947), Washington, D.C.: American Educational Research Association
4 Scott, G., Leritz, L.E., & Mumford, M.D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 361-388.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Treffinger, D.J. (2000). Practice Problems for Creative Problem Solving (3rd Ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press, Inc.
6 Treffinger, D. J., Isaksen, S. G. & Dorval, K. B. (1994). Creative problem solving: An introduction. Sarasota, FL: Center for Creative Learning.
7 Treffinger, D.J., Isaksen, S.G., & Dorval, K.B. (2006). Creative Problem Solving(CPS): An Introduction (4th ed.). Waco, TX: Prifrock Press, Inc.
8 Treffinger, D.J., Sortore, M.R., & Cross, J.A. (1993). Programs and strategies for nurturing creativity. In K.A. Heller, F.J. Monks & A.H. Passow (Eds.), International Handbook for Research on Giftedness and talent (pp. 555- 567). Oxford: Pergamon
9 Wallace, J., & Louden,W. (1992). Science teaching and teachers'knowledge: Prospects for reform of elementary classrooms. Science Education, 76, 507-521.   DOI
10 Wang, C.W., & Horng, R.Y. (2002) The effects of creative problem solving training on creativity, cognitive type and R&D performance. R&D Management, 32, 35-45.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Weisberg, R.W. (2006). Creativity: Understanding Innovation in Problem Solving, Science, Invention, and the Arts. NJ: John Wiley & Sons
12 Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in collge- and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 89-99.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 강호감, 노석구, 이희순, 홍석인, 최선영, 원용준, 하정원, 김지선 (2001). 창의력 계발을 위한 자연과 교수학습자료 개발 -2. 개발과 적용-. 한국과학교육학회지, 21(1),89-101.
14 김형석, 정용재, 곽성일, 하은성, 이선양, 이현정(2004). 과학창의력 신장을 위한'일상생활 소재 다중활동'중심의 6-7학년'재량활동'프로그램 개발과 효과 탐색. 한국초등과학교육학회지, 23(4), 344-356.
15 박인숙, 강순희 (2011). 과학 창의적 문제 해결 능력에대한 현장 교사들의 인식. 한국과학교육학회지, 31(2),314-327.
16 박종석, 김민정 (2003). 과학 창의성 프로그램 분석을통한 과학 창의성 요소 추출, 중등교육연구, 51(2), 269-285
17 박종원 (2004). 과학적 창의성 모델의 제안 -인지적측면을 중심으로-. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(2), 375-386.
18 박종원 (2011). 과학적 창의성의 이해와 지도. 새물리,61(10), 947-961.
19 박종원, 김본경, 최재혁, 지경준 (2010). 과학적 창의성 지도를 위한 워크숍 방식의 심화 연수 프로그램의 개발과 적용. 한국과학교육학회지, 30(8), 1017-1030.
20 박종원, 지경준 (2010). 과학 영재아의 창의적 과제 수행과정에서의 특성 분석, 한국과학교육학회지, 30(6),770-784.
21 박종원, 박종석, 이강길 (2008). 과학적 창의성 활동자료 개발. KRF-2007-721-B00034. 학술진흥재단 연구 보고서.
22 이경학, 박종원 (2012). 교사연수를 통한 과제 수행형과학적 창의성 평가도구(TATSC) 현장 활용 가능성 탐색.교사교육연구, 51(1), 1-15.
23 임성만, 양일호, 임재근 (2009). 영역 특수적인 입장에서의 과학적 창의성에 대한 정의, 구성요인에 대한 탐색,과학교육연구지, 33(1), 31-43.
24 정현철, 한기순, 김병노, 최승언 (2002). 과학 창의성계발을 위한 프로그램 개발 -이론과 예시를 중심으로- 한국지구과학회지, 23(4), 334-348.
25 지경준, 박종원 (2012). 과학적 창의성 향상을 위한 가족활동(FAISC) 프로그램의 개발과 적용, 한국과학교육학회 총회 및 제61차 동계학술대회, 서울
26 최선영, 김지인 (2011). 초등과학에서 창의적 문제 해결 수업 적용에 따른 학습자 유형에 대한 효과. 초등과학교육, 30(4), 615-623.
27 황요한, 박종석 (2010). 과학영재의 창의성 신장을 위한 CNP 모형의 개발과 적용. 영재교육연구, 20(3), 847-866.
28 Baer, J. (1991). Generality of creativity across performance domains. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 23-39.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Banks, F., Mayes, A.S., Oakes, M., & Sutton, D. (2001). Teaching early professional development: The context. In Early Professional Development for Teacher, In F. Banks and A.S. Mayes (Eds.), (pp. 1-11), London: David Fulton Publishers and The Open University
30 Cheng, M.M.H., Cheng, A.Y.N., & Tang, S.Y.F. (2010). Closing the gap between the theory and practice of teaching: implications for teacher education programmes in Hong Kong. Journal of Education for Teaching, 36(1), 91-104.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Conti, R., Coon, H., & Amabile, T.M. (1996). Evidence to support the componential model of creativity: Secondary analyses of three studies. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 358- 389.
32 Cropley, A.J. (2003). Creativity in Education & Learning: A Guide for Teachers and Educators. London: Kogan Page Limited.
33 Driel,, J.H., & Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional Development and Reform in Science Education: The Role of Teachers'Practical Knowledge. Journal or Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137-158.   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Eberle, B. (2008). Scamper: Creative Games and Activities for Imagination Development. Waco, TX: Prifrock Press, Inc.
35 Ebert, C., & Ebert II, E.S. (1998). The Inventive Mind in Science: Creative Thinking Activities. Englewood, CO: Teacher Ideas Press.
36 Fogler, H.S., LeBlanc, S.E. (2008). Strategies for Creative Problem Solving (2nd ed.). NY; Pearson Education, Inc.
37 Higgins, J.M. (2006). 101 Creative Problem Solving Techniques: The handbook of new Ideas for Business. FL: New Management Publishing Company, Inc.
38 Hoban, G.F. (2005). The missing links in teacher education design: Developing a multi-linked conceptual framework. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
39 Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389-403.   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Kampylis, P.G., & Valtanen, J. (2010). Redefining creativity-Analyzing definitions, collocations, and consequences. Journal of Creative Behavior, 44(3), 191-214.   DOI   ScienceOn
41 Mansfield, R. S., & Busse, T. V. (1981). The psychology of creativity and discovery: scientists and their work. Chicago: Nelson-Hall Inc.
42 Mansfield, R.S., Busse, T.V., & Krepelka, E.J. (1978). The effectiveness of creativity training. Review of Educational Research, 48, 517-536.   DOI   ScienceOn
43 Mohamed, A. (2006). Investigating the scientific creativity of fifth-grade students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Arizona
44 Newton, D.P. and Newton, L.D. (2009). "Some student teachers'conceptions of creativity in school science." Research in science technological education, 27(1), 45-60.   DOI   ScienceOn
45 Noller, R.B., Parnes, S.J., Biondi, A.M. (1976). Creative Actionbook: Revised Edition of Creative Behavior Workbook. NY: Charles Scribner's Sons.
46 Park, Jongwon. (2012). Developing the format and samples of teaching materials for scientific creativity in the ordinary science curriculum -Including teachers'practice and reflection-. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 32(3), 446-466.
47 Plucker, J. A. (2004). Generalization of creativity across domains: Examination of the method effect hypothesis. Journal of Creative Behavior, 38, 1 .12.
48 Plucker, J.A., Beghetto, R.A., & Dow, G.T. (2004). Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83-96.   DOI   ScienceOn