Characteristics of School Science Inquiry Based on the Case Analyses of High School Science Classes
![]() |
Lee, Sun-Kyung
(Seoul National University)
Son, Jeong-Woo (Gyeongsang National University) Kim, Jong-Hee (Chonnam National University) Park, Jongseok (Kyungpook National University) Seo, Hae-Ae (Pusan National University) Shim, Kew-Cheol (Kongju National University) Lee, Ki-Young (Kangwon National University) Lee, Bongwoo (Dankook University) Choi, Jaehyeok (Chonnam National University) |
1 | 이선경, 이선경, 김찬종, 김희백 (2005). 비형식적 과학 학습 자료의 시나리오 및 논증 구조: 영국 자연사박물관의 공룡관의 사례 연구. 한국과학교육학회지, 25(7),849-866 |
2 | Abd-El-Khalick, F., Boujaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H.-L. (2004). Inquiry in Science Education: international Perspectives. Science Education, 88(3), 397-419. DOI ScienceOn |
3 | Chinn, C. A. & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: a theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86, 175-218. DOI ScienceOn |
4 | Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classroom. Science Education, 84, 287-312. DOI ScienceOn |
5 | Duschl, R. A. & Grandy, R. (2012). Two views about explicitly teaching nature of science. Science & Education, published online: 06 October. |
6 | Garcia-Mila, M. & Anderson, C. (2008). Cognitive foundations of learning argumentation. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre (eds.), Argumentation in science education (pp. 29-45). Springer |
7 | Giere, R. (1988). Explaining science: A cognitive approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press |
8 | Grandy, R. & Duschl, R. A. (2007). Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: analysis of a conference. Science & Education, 16, 141-166. DOI ScienceOn |
9 | Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. & Erduran, S. (2008). Argumentation in science education: an overview. In M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre & S. Erduran (eds.), Argumentation in science education: perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 3-27). Springer. |
10 | Kuhn, D. & Franklin, S. (2006). The second decade: What develops (and how)? In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Seried Eds.), D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2, Cognition, perception, and language (6th ed., pp. 953-993). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. |
11 | McNeil, K. L. (2011). Elementary students'views of explanation, argumentation, and evidence and their abilities to construct arguments over the school year. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(7), 793-823. DOI ScienceOn |
12 | Millar, R. (1998). Rhetoric and reality: what practical work in science education is really for. In J. Wellington (ed.), Practical work in science education: which way now? (pp. 16-31). London: Routledge. |
13 | Moshman, D. (1998). Cognitive development beyond childhood. In D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2, Cognition, perception, and language (5th ed., pp. 947-978). New York: Wiley. |
14 | National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press |
15 | National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: a guide for teaching and learning. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. |
16 | Nersessian, N. (2002). The cognitive basis of modelbased reasoning in science. In P. Carruthers, S. Stich, & M. Siegal (Eds.), The cognitive basis of science (pp. 133 153). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
17 | Norris, S. & Phillips, L. (2005). 'Reading as inquiry', NSF inquiry conference proceedings. http://www.ruf.rice.edu /rgrandy/NSFConSched.html. |
18 | White, R. & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing understanding. London, UK: Falmer Press. |
19 | Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. P. (2011). Argument-driven inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: an exploratory study. Science Education, 95, 217- 257. DOI ScienceOn |
20 | Siegel, H. (1989). The rationality of science, critical thinking and science education. Syntheses, 80(1), 9-42. DOI |
21 | Zimmerman, C. (2000). The development of scientific reasoning skills. Developmental Review, 20, 99-149. DOI ScienceOn |
![]() |