Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.1.079

Patterns of Middle School Students' Value-Judgement and Decision-Making on Biotechnology-Related Socioscientific Issues  

Ju, In-Ae (Ewha Womans University)
Lee, Hyunju (Ewha Womans University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.33, no.1, 2013 , pp. 79-93 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study examined value-judgement and decision-making process of middle school students on three biotechnology related socioscientific issues (SSI) (i.e. designer baby, amniotic fluid test, and embryonic stem cell research). In particular, it focused on the level of consistency in their value application to the decisions. Twenty 8th grade students participated in the SSI program. The participants were asked to mark their positions on each issue before and after the debates. All classroom and sub-group debates were audio-recorded. The researcher conducted individual interviews with 10 students after the program. The results show three patterns emerging. First, five students applied their personal values in a consistent manner when making decisions on the three consecutive issues. Second, three students demonstrated incremental resoluteness in their value application as the sessions proceeded and had tendency to be oriented towards a specific value, more so towards the end of the program than the beginning. And third, four students gradually showed ambivalence in their decisions as they participate in the program. The results suggest that science teachers addressing SSI need to encourage students to be aware of their own values and to engage in internalized decision-making in light of those values. They also need to be aware of the possible challenges that students might feel in their decision-making process caused by the complexity of SSI.
Keywords
biotechnology; socioscientific issues; decision-making; value-judgement;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 김희백, 이선경(1996). 과학.기술과 관련하여 사회적으로 쟁점화된 주제에 대한 중.고등학생의 태도. 한국과학교육학회지, 16(4), 461-469.
2 양정은, 김현정, Lei Gao, 김은진, 김성원, 이현주 (2012). 과학과 관련된 사회.윤리적 문제(SSI)의 도입을 통한 창의.인성 교육 가능성에 대한 과학교사들의 인식. 한국과학교육학회지, 32(1), 113-128.
3 이현주(2008). 과학과 관련된 사회적.윤리적 문제에 대한 예비 과학교사들의 의사결정유형. 교과교육학연구, 12(2), 377-395.
4 Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87, 352-377.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Berkowitz, M. W., & Simmons, P. (2003). Integrating science education and character education. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 117-138). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
6 Chang, H., & Lee, H. (2010). College students'decision-making tendencies in the context of socioscientific issues(SSI). Journal of Korean Association in Science Education, 30(7), 887-900.
7 Connell, S., Fien, J., Lee, J., Sykes, H., & Yencken, D. (1999).' If it doesn't directly affect you, you don't think about it': A qualitative study of young people's environmental attitudes in two Australian cities. Environmental Education Research, 5(1), 96-113.
8 Dreyfus, A., & Roth, Z. (1991). Twelfthgrade biology pupils'opinions on interventions of man in nature: Agreement, indifference and ambivalence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(1), 81-95.   DOI
9 Grace, M. M. & Ratcliffe, M. (2002). The science and values that young people draw upon to make decisions about biological conservation issues. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1157-1169.   DOI
10 Halverson, K. L., Siegel, M. A., & Freyermuth, S. K. (2009). Lenses for framing decisions: Undergraduates'decision making about stem cell research. International Journal of Science Education, 31(9), 1249-1268.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Lee, H., Chang, H., Choi, K., Kim, S., & Zeidler, D. L. (2012). Developing character and values for global citizens: Analysis of preservice science teachers'moral reasoning on socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 925-953.   DOI
12 Lincoln, Y. & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13 Means, M. L. & Voss, J. F. (1996). Who reasons well? Two studies of informal reasoning among children of different grade, ability, and knowledge levels. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 139-178.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Millar, R., (2006). Twenty first century science: Insights from the design and implementation of a scientific literacy approach in school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(13), 1499-1521.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. Fulmar Colour Printing Company Limited, King's College London.
16 National Research Council [NRC]. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
17 Perkins, D. N., Farady, M., & Bushey, B. (1991). Everyday reasoning and the roots of intelligence. In J. F. Voss, D.N. Perkins, & J.W. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education(pp. 83 105). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
18 Ratcliffe, M. (1997). Pupil decision-making about socio-scientific issues within the science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 162-182.
19 Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas. Science Education, 88, 4-27.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112-138.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Sadler, T. D., Chambers, W. F., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). Student conceptualizations of the nature of science in response to a socioscientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 26(4), 387-409.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M., & Howes, E. (2005). Beyond STS: A researchbased framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89, 357-377.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Applebaum, S., & Callahan, B. E. (2009). Advancing reflective judgment through socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(1), 74-101.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students'knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 35-62.   DOI   ScienceOn