1 |
Cantrell, P., Young, S., & Moore, A. (2003). Factors affecting science teaching efficacy of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 14(3), 177-192.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Czerniak, C. M., & Schriver, M. L. (1994). An examination of preservice science teachers' beliefs and behaviors as related to self-efficacy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 5(3), 77-86.
DOI
|
3 |
Deemer, S. A., & Minke, K. M. (1999). An investigation of the factor structure of the teacher efficacy scale. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(1), 3-10.
DOI
|
4 |
Enochs, L. G., & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching efficacy belief instrument: A preservice elementary scale. School Science & Mathematics, 90, 694-706.
DOI
|
5 |
Gibson, S. & Dembo, M. H. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A construct validation, Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(4), 569-582.
DOI
|
6 |
Ginns, I. S., & Watters, J. J. (1999). Beginning elementary school teachers and the effective teaching of science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10(4), 287- 313.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
Glasersfeld, E. (1993). Questions and answers about radical constructivism. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp.23-38). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
|
8 |
Howe, K. R., & Berv, J. (2000). Constructing constructivism, epistemology and pedagogy. In D. C. Phillops (Ed.), Constructivism in education: Opinions and second opinions on controversial issues (pp.19-40). Chicago,Illinois: The University of Chicago Press.
|
9 |
Hudson, P. (2005). Identifying mentoring practices for developing effective primary science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1723-1739.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Hudson, P. & Ginns, I. (2007). Developing an instrument to examine preservice teachers' pedagogical development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 885-899.
DOI
|
11 |
Kemp, J. E., Morrison, G. R., & Ross, S. M. (1994). Designing effective instruction. New York: Macmillan College Publishing Company.
|
12 |
Kennedy, M. M. (1998). Education reform and subject matter knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 249-263.
DOI
|
13 |
Khourey-Browers, C., & Simonis, D. G. (2004). Longitudinal study of middle grades chemistry professional development: Enhancement of personal science teaching selfefficacy and outcome expectancy. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 15(3), 175-195.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Lederman, N. G., & Gess-Newsome, J. (1992). Do subject matter knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, and pedagogical content knowledge constitute the ideal gas law of science teaching? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 3(1), 16-20.
DOI
|
15 |
Park, S. H. (2006). Pedagogical content knowledge among science teachers based on teaching method, self-efficacy, and attitude on science teaching. Journal of Korea Association of Research in Science Education, 26(1), 122-131.
|
16 |
Radford, D. L. (1993). Transferring theory into practice: A model for professional development for science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(1), 73 88.
|
17 |
Sim, J. (2006). Secondary school science teachers' perceptions about professionality and in-service training program for experiment. Korean Journal of Biology Education, 34(1), 27-37.
|
18 |
Son, Y., Shin, J., Min, B. (2007). Analysis of pre-service biology teachers' class applying the science instructional model: Using the microteaching technique. Korean Journal of Biology Education, 35(3), 495-507.
|
19 |
Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 963-980.
DOI
|
20 |
Watters, J. J., & Ginns, I. S. (2000). Developing motivation to teach elementary science: Effect of collaborative and authentic learning practices in preservice education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 11, 301-321.
DOI
ScienceOn
|