Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2010.30.6.770

Characteristics of Scientifically Gifted Students' Performance Processes in the Creative Tasks  

Park, Jong-Won (Chonnam National University)
Jee, Kyoung-Jun (Chonnam National University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.30, no.6, 2010 , pp. 770-784 More about this Journal
Abstract
In this study, we investigated students' behavioral characteristics in the process of and their responses to scientific creativity activities developed based on the three steps of learning model (Park, Park, & Lee, 2008) and scientific creativity model (Park, 2004). Students' responses were obtained by questionnaire, effectiveness of learning materials was explored by comparing students activities before and after the second step, 'Guide', and various characteristic behaviors were obtained through video-recording of their activities. As results, students answered that even though the activities were a little difficult, the activities were nonetheless interesting to them, and they wanted to do the activities more completely, and wanted them in future courses. It was also found that the second step activity was helpful in improving students' divergent thinking. Finally, from the findings about various students' behavioral characteristics, some practical recommendations for more effective teaching of scientific creativity were suggested.
Keywords
scientific creativity; teaching model; teaching guides; interest; gifted students; gifted education;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Parens, S.J. (1999). Programs and courses in creativity. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), The Creativity Research Handbook: Volume one (pp. 465-477). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
2 Peirce, C. S. (1955) Abduction and induction. In J. Buchler (Ed.), Philosophical writings of Peirce (pp. 150-156). New York: Dover Publications.
3 Park, Jongwon., Jang, Kyoung-Ae., & Kim, Ikgyun. (2009). An analysis of the actual physicists'research and implications for scientific inquiry in school. Research in Science Education. 39, 111-129.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Parens, S.J., Noller, R.B., & Biondi, A.M. (1977). Guide to Creative Action. NYC: Charles Scribner's Sons.
5 Mansfield, R.D., & Busse, T.V. (1981). The Psychology of Creativity and Discovery: Scientists and Their Work. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
6 Park, Jongwon (2004b. 7). Asia-Pacific International Conference for the Gifted. Suggesting a Model of Scientific Creativity (MSC) and Developing Scientific Creativity Activities
7 Park, Jongwon (2006). Modelling analysis of students' processes of generating scientific explanatory hypothesis. International Journal of Science Education. 28(5), 469-489.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Nickerson, R. S. (1999). Enhancing Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 392-430). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9 Noller, R.B., Parens, S.J., & Biondi, A.M. (1976). Creative actionbook. New York: Scribner's.
10 Osborn, A. (1963). Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking. NY: Scribner's.
11 Mansfield, R.S., Busse, T.V., & Krepelka, E.J. (1978). The effectiveness of creativity training. Review of Educational Research, 48, 517-536.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligence. New York: Basic Books.
13 Guildford, J.P. (1950). Creativity, American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.   DOI
14 Guildford, J.P. (1968). Intelligence, creativity, and their educational implications. San Diego, CA: EDITS.
15 Hanson, N. R. (1961). Patterns of discovery: An inquiry into the conceptual foundations of science. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
16 Fasco, D. (2001). Education and Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3/4), 317-327.   DOI
17 Fritz, R. L. (1993). Problem solving attitude among secondary marketing education students. Marketing Educators Journal, 19, 45-59.
18 Clapham, M. M. (1997). Ideational skills training: A key element in creativity training programs. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 33-44.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Scott. G., Leritz, L.E., & Mumford, M.D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 361-388.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. In T.B Ward, S.M. Smith and J. Vaid (Eds.). Creative Thought: An Investigation of Conceptual Structures and Processes (pp.461-494). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
21 Clements, D. H. (1991). Enhancement of creativity in computer environments. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 173-187.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Conti, R., Coon, H., & Amabile, T.M. (1996). Evidence to support the componential model of creativity: Secondary analyses of three studies. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 358-389.
23 Baer, J. (1991). Generality of creativity across performance domains. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 23-39.   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Cropley, A.J., & Urban, K.K. (2000). Programs and strategies for nurturing creativity. In K.A. Heller, F.J. Monks, R.J. Sternberg., and R.F. Subotnik (Eds.), International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent (pp. 485-498). Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.
25 Cropley, A.J. (1999). Definitions of creativity. In M. A. Runco & S.R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity: Volume one (pp. 511-524.). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
26 Bull, K.S., Montgomery, D., & Baloche, L. (1995). Teaching Creativity at the College Level: A Synthesis of Curricular Components Perceived as Important by Instructors, Creativity Research Journal, 8(1), 83-89.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 신원호, 정환재, 박종원 (2009). 과학자의 성장기 분석을 통한 사례 중심의 과학 영재 행동특성 체크리스트 제안. 2009년 국제학술대회 및 제 56 차 한국과학교육학회 하계 학술대회 발표. 광주: 조선대학교.
28 Xu, F., McDonne.., G., & Nash, W.R. (2005). A survey of creativity courses at university in principal countries. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 39(2), 75-88.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 오원근 (2006). 과학자의 생애 분석을 통한 과학 영재 판별 준거. 새물리, 53(5), 361-369.
30 Altshuller, G.S. (1984). Creativity as an Exact Science, NY: Gordon and Breach.
31 박종원, 박종석, 이강길 (2008). 과학적 창의성 활동 자료의 개발. 한국학술진흥재단 지원 연구 결과 보고서.
32 Solomon, B., Powell, K., & Gardner, H. (1999). Multiple intelligences. In In M.A. Runco & S.R. Pritzker (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Creativity Vol. 1 (pp. 261-272). London: Academic Press.
33 Torrance, E.P. (1987). Teaching for creativity, In S.G. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research (pp. 190-215). Buffalo, NY: Bearly Press.
34 Treffinger, D.J. (1995). Creative problem solving: Overview and educational implications. Educational Psychology Review, 7(3), 301-312.   DOI   ScienceOn
35 박종원, 등 (2009). 과학영재 교육기관 수학.통합과학 공통교재 개발 보급. 한국과학창의재단 지원, 과학영재교육 진흥연구사업.
36 Treffinger, D.J. , Sortore, M.R., & Cross, J.A. (1993). Programs and strategies for nurturing creativity. In K.A. Heller, F.J. Monks & A.H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook for research on giftedness and talent (pp. 555-567). Oxford: Pergamon.
37 Wang, C.W., & Horng, R.Y. (2002) The effects of creative problem solving training on creativity, cognitive type and R&D performance. R&D Management, 32, 35 45.   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Rose, L.H., & Lin, H.T. (1984). The metaanalysis of long-term creativity training programs. Journal of Creative Behavior, 18, 11-22.   DOI
39 박종원 (2004). 과학적 창의성 모델의 제안 - 인지적 측면을 중심으로 - 한국과학교육학회지, 24(2), 375-386.   과학기술학회마을
40 박종원, 김두현 (2008). 과학의 본성 지도자료 개발과 과학영재를 대상으로 한 시험적용 . 한국과학교육학회지, 28(2), 169-179.   과학기술학회마을
41 Sternberg, R.J., Grigorenko, E.L., & Singer, J.L. (2004). Creativity: From Potential to Realization. APA.
42 Park, Jongwon., & Park, Jongseok. (2008.7). Establishing the Model of Scientific Creativity and the Development of Teaching Materials for Scientific Creativity . Paper presented at the 10th Asia-Pacific Conference of Giftedness. Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.