1 |
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), Project 2061. (1994). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
|
2 |
Boulter, C. J., & Gilbert, J. K. (1995). Argument and science education. In P. J. M. Costello & S. Mitchell (Eds.), Competing and consensual voices: The theory and practice of argument(pp. 84-98). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
|
3 |
최재혁, 서정희 (2007). 과학 영재의 국제경진대회 활동에서 창의성의 사회적 측면 분석 - 국제 청소년 물리 토너먼트 사례를 중심으로 -. 초등과학교육, 25(5), 582-590.
|
4 |
이봉우, 이성묵 (2004a). 온라인 물리탐구토론에 나타난 학생들의 상호작용 유형 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(3), 638-645.
과학기술학회마을
|
5 |
이효녕, 조현준, 손정주 (2009). 학교과학교육에서의 논증활동 활용에 대한 교사들의 인식. 한국과학교육학회지, 29(6), 666-479.
과학기술학회마을
|
6 |
Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 35-62.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
조현준, 양일호, 이효녕, 송윤미 (2008). 초등과학 영재의 논증활동에서 사용된 증거의 수준 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 28(5), 495-505.
과학기술학회마을
|
8 |
이봉우, 이성묵 (2004b). 중학생들의 온라인 물리 탐구토론 내용 분석. 새물리, 48(3), 216-222.
|
9 |
Welch, W. W. (1981). Inquiry in school science. In N. Harms, & R. Yager, Project synthesis, What research says, Vol 3 NSTA.
|
10 |
양일호, 이효정, 이효녕, 조현준 (2009). 과학적 논증과정 평가를 위한 루브릭 개발. 한국과학교육학회지, 29(2), 203-220.
과학기술학회마을
|
11 |
김희경 (2003). 중학생의 동료간 논변활동을 강조한 개방적 물리 탐구: 조건, 특징, 역할을 중심으로. 서울대학교 박사학위 논문.
|
12 |
Richmond, G., & Striley, J. (1996). Making meaning in classroom: Social processes in small-group discourse and scientific knowledge building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8), 839-858.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
van Aufschnaiter, C., Erduran, S., Osborne, J., & Simon, S. (2008). Auguing to learn and learning to augue: case studies of how sutdents'augumentation relates to their scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 101-131.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Walton, D. N. (1996). Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning, Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
|
15 |
Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 2006, 235-260.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
교육인적자원부(2007). 과학과 교육과정. 교육인적자원부 고시 제 2007-79호.
|
17 |
Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
|
18 |
National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
|
19 |
National Research Council (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
|
20 |
Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 994-1020.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Meyer, K., & Woodruff, E. (1997). Consensually driven explanation in science teaching. Science Education, 81(2), 173-192.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, Learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
|
23 |
Martins, I., Mortimer, E., Osborne, J., Tsatsarelis, C., & Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P. (2001). Rhetoric and science education. In H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, R. Duit, W. Graber, & M. Komorek (Eds.), Research in science education-past, present, and future (pp. 189-198). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
24 |
Mason, L. (1996). An analysis of children's construction of new knowledge through their use of reasoning and arguing in classroom discussions. Qualitative Studies in Education, 9, 411-433.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
Heigenberg, W. (1969). Der Teil und das Ganze. Gesprache im Umkreis der Atomphysik. Piper. 김용준 역(1982). 부분과 전체. 서울: 지식산업사.
|
26 |
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Pereiro-Munoz, C. (2002). Knowledge producers or knowledge consumers? Argumentation and decision making about environmental management. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1171-1190.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
27 |
Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions, 3rd ed. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
|
28 |
Leach, J. (1999). Students' understanding of the co-ordination of theory and evidence in science. International Journal of Science Education, 21, 789-806.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
Lee, B. W., Son, J. W., & Lee, S. M. (2005). Science-gifted students' scientific inquiry change in online argumentative discussion. J. Korea Assoc. Res. Sci. Edu., 25(6), 642-649.
|
30 |
Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88, 915-933.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
31 |
한국물리교육연구센터 (1994). 과학 공동탐구 토론대회 보고서. 서울: 관악사.
|
32 |
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84, 287-312.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
33 |
Duschl, R. A., Ellenbogen, K., & Erduran, S. (1999). Promoting argumentation in middle school science classrooms. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching(NARST), Boston, MA.
|
34 |
Duschl, R., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse. Studies in Science Education, 38, 39-72.
DOI
ScienceOn
|