1 |
Yang, I.-H., Jeong, J-S., Kwon, Y.-J., Jeong, J.-W., Heo, M. & Oh, C.-H. (2006). An intensive interview study on the process of scientists' science knowledge generation. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 26(1), 88-98.
과학기술학회마을
|
2 |
Yi, H.-J. & Kang, S.-J. (2005). Reformation and application of an introductory chemistry laboratory at the university for teacher education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 25(3), 346-352.
|
3 |
Soldatova, L. N. & King, R. D. (2006). An ontology of scientific experiments, Journal of the Royal Society Interface. 3(11): 795 803.
DOI
|
4 |
Leonard, W. H. (1983). An Experimental study of a BSCS-style laboratory approach for university general biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(9), 807-813.
DOI
|
5 |
Tamir, P. (1997). How are the laboratories used? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14(3), 311-316.
|
6 |
Tobin, K. (1990). Research on science laboratory activities. School Science and Mathematics, 90(5), 403-418.
DOI
|
7 |
Patton, M. Q. (2000). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publications, pp. 104-110, 113-115, 482-487, 497-499.
|
8 |
Shepardson, D. P. (1997). The nature of student thinking in life science laboratories. School Science and Mathematics, 97(10), 37-44.
DOI
|
9 |
Park, J., Jang, K.-A. & Kim, I. (2009). An analysis of the actual processes of physicists' research and the implications for teaching scientific inquiry in school, Research in Science Education, 39(1), 111-129.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Kim, Y.-S. & Yang, I.-H. & Park, G.-S. (2006). The analysis of quantity of science experiment lessons in university. The Research of Secondary Education, 54(1), 79-94.
|
11 |
Lin, J. Y. (2007). Responses to anomalous data obtained from repeatable experiments in the laboratory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(3), 506-528.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
12 |
Noh, T.-H., Lim, H.-Y. & Kang, S.-J. (2000). Types of students' responses to anomalous data. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 20(2), 288-296.
|
13 |
Hofstein, A. (2004). The laboratory in chemistry education; thirty years of experience with developments, implementation, and research. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 5(3), 247-264.
DOI
|
14 |
Lim, H.-Y. & Kang, S.-J. (2009). Undergraduates'response pattern on the problem-solving-type general chemistry laboratory. Journal of the Korean association for Science Education, 29(2), 193-202.
과학기술학회마을
|
15 |
Kim, H.-K. & Song, J.-W. (2003). Middle school students' ideas about the purposes of laboratory work. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 23(3), 254- 264.
과학기술학회마을
|
16 |
Kim, Y.-S. (2010). The Comprehension of process of the creative idea generation produced in a process of the idea-creative type inquiry, Unpublished master thesis of Korea National University of Education, pp15-18.
|
17 |
Germann, P. J., Aram, R. A., & Burke, G. (1996). Identifying patterns and relationships among the responses of seventh-grade students to the science process skills of designing experiments. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(1), 79-99.
DOI
|
18 |
Hofstein A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century, Science Education, 88. 28-54.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Lee, E.-K. & Kang, S.-J. (2008). The Effect of SWH application on problem-solving type inquiry modules through student-student verbal interactions. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 28(2), 130-138.
과학기술학회마을
|
20 |
Dunbar, K. (2000). How scientists think in the real world: implications for science education. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 49-58.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Dunbar, K. (1993). Concept discovery in a scientific domain. Cognitive Science Society, 17, 397-434.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Bodner, G. M. & Herron, J. D. (2002). Problem-solving in Chemistry. In Gilbert, J. K. & Jong, O. D. & Justi, R. & Treagust, D. F. & Driel J. V. (Eds.) Chemical Education: Towards research-based practice (pp. 235-266). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
|
23 |
Brush, S. G. (1974). Should the history of science be rated X? Science, 183, 1164-1172.
DOI
ScienceOn
|