Browse > Article

Cases and Features of Abductive Inference Conducted by a Young Child to Explain Natural Phenomena in Everyday Life  

Joung, Yong-Jae (Seoul Daeyoung Elementary School)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.28, no.3, 2008 , pp. 197-210 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore the cases and features of the abductive inference used by young children when trying to explain natural phenomena in everyday life. From observing a 5-year-old's daily activities with his family, and analyzing the data according to the criterion extracted from the form of abductive inference described by C. S. Peirce, a few cases where the child used abductive inferences to explain natural phenomena were found. The abductive inferences in the cases were conducted: (a) based on figural resemblance and behavioral resemblance (b) under the influence by individual belief and communal belief, then (c) resulted in new categorization accompanied by over generalization. Such features of the abductive inference showed the 'double faces'; sometimes encourages and sometimes discourages children's generating better scientific hypotheses and explanations. These results suggest that even young children use abductive inference to explain doubtful natural phenomena in everyday life, although we need to consider carefully with the double aspects of the features of abductive inference for the practical applications to the fields of science education. Finally, several suggestions and following studies for science education are proposed.
Keywords
abductive inference; hypothesis generation; explanation of natural phenomena;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 11  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Science Education for Everyday Life: Evidence-based practice. New York: Teachers College Press
2 Aliseda, A. (2004). Logics in scientific discovery. Foundations of Science, 9, 339-363   DOI
3 Chen, Z., & Daehler, M. W. (1992). Intention and outcome: Key components of causal structure facilitating mapping in children's analogical transfer. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 53, 237-257   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Inagaki, K. (1992). Piagetian and post-Piagetian conceptions of development and their implications for science education in early childhood. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 7, 115-133   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Joung, Y. J. (2006). What do children do in everyday life to construct their scientific knowledge?: A case stud of a 5-year-old's experience. Proceedings of the International Science Education Conference 2006 (pp. 960-969), 22 nd - 24 th November 2006, Singapore
6 Kwon, Y. -J, Jeong, J. -S., Park, Y, -B., and Kang, M. -J. (2003b). A philosophical study on the generating process of declarative scientific knowledge: Focused on inductive, abductive, and deductive process. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 23(3), 215-228
7 Murphey, M. G. (1969). The development of Peirce's philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
8 Oh, P. S. (2006). Rule-inferring strategies for abductive reasoning in the process of solving an earth-environmental problem. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 26(4), 546-558
9 Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
10 Thagard, P. (1988). Computational philosophy of science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
11 Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. (1987). Theories of Knowledge restructing in development. Review of Educational Research, 57(1), 51-67   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Anderson, J. R. (2000). Cognitive psychology and its Implication. 6th ed. New York: Worth Publishers
13 Lawson, A. E. (2002). What does Galileo's discovery of Jupiter's moons tell us about the process of scientific discovery?. Science & Education, 11(1), 1-24   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Hanson, N. R. (1961). Is there a logic of scientific discovery? In B. A. Brody & R. E. Grandy (1989) (Eds.) Readings in the philosophy of science (pp. 398-409). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
15 Park, E. M., & Kang, S. H. (2006). Effects of offering similar experiences for hypothesis-generation based on abduction. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 26(3), 356-366
16 Osborne, R. J., & Freyberg, P. (1985). Learning in science: The implications of children's science. London: Heinemann
17 Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. NJ: Princeton University Press
18 Gilbert, J. K., Osborne, R. J., & Fensham, P. J. (1982). Children's science and its consequences for teaching. Science Education 66(4), 623-633   DOI
19 Paavola, S. (2004). Abduction as a logic and methodology of discovery: The importance of strategies. Foundation of Science, 9(3), 267-283
20 Hinton, G. E., McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1986). Distributed representations. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Exploration in the microstructure of cognition, Vol. 1 (pp. 77-109). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
21 Joung, Y. J., & Song, J. (2006a). The features of the hypotheses generated by pre-service elementary teachers using the form of Peirce's abduction. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 25(2), 126-140
22 Brooks, L. R. (1987). Non-analytic cognition. In U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual bases of categories. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press
23 Chen, Z. (1996). Children's analogical problem solving: The effects of superficial, structural, and procedural similarity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 62, 410-431   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children's ideas in science. Milton Keynes, Philadelphia: Open University Press
25 Fischer, H. R. (2001). Abductive reasoning as a way of worldmaking. Foundation of Science, 6, 361-383
26 Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. Jossey-Bass Publishers
27 Park, J. (2000). Analysis of students' processes of generating scientific explanatory hypothesis: Focused on the definition and the characteristics of scientific hypothesis. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 20(4), 667-679
28 Kim, K., Shin, E., Byun, S., & Noh, T. (2006). Analysis of students' mapping errors induced in learning chemistry concept with analogy. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 26(4), 592-600
29 Rosch, E., & Marvis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblance: Studies in the internal structure of categories, Cognitive Psychology, 7, 573-605   DOI
30 Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
31 Magnani, L. (2004). Model and manipulative abduction in science. Foundation of Science, 9(3), 219-247
32 Kang, T. (2006). The characteristics of Typically Perceived Situations (TPSs) and Critical Examples: Focusing on the secondary students' ideas of force and mechanical conversion. Unpublished MEd thesis. Seoul National University
33 Curd, M. V. (1980). The logic of discovery: an analysis of three approaches. In B. A. Brody & R. E. Grandy(1989) (Eds.), Readings in the philosophy of science (pp. 417-430). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
34 Else, M. J., Clement, J., & Ramirez, M. A. (2003). Should different types of analogies be treated differently in instruction?: Observation from a middleschool life science curriculum. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA
35 Kim, J. Y., & Kang, S. H. (2006). The practical use of process skill and the perception about hypothesis by secondary school science teachers. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 26(2), 258-267
36 Crisafi, M. A., & Brown, A. L. (1986). Analogical transfer in very young children: Combining two separately learned solutions to reach a goal. Child Development, 57, 953-968   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Gilbert, J. K., & Watts, D. M. (1983). Concepts, misconception and alternative conceptions: changing perspectives in science education, Studies in Science Education, 10, 61-98   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Lawson, A. E. (1995). Science Teaching and the Development of Thinking. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company
39 Newell, A., & Simon, H. (1972). Human problem-solving. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs: NJ
40 Kaufman, D.R., Vosniadou, S., diSessa, A. & Thagard, P. (2000). Scientific Explanation, Systematicity, and Conceptual Change. In L. Gleitman & A.K. Joshi (eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 5-9). Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
41 Medin, D. L. (1989). Concepts and conceptual structure. American Psychologist, 44(12), 1469-1481   DOI   ScienceOn
42 Jung, Y. -J., & Song, J. (2004). An analysis of the features of 'Typically-Perceived-Situation (TPS)' for in-depth understanding of students' ideas: The case of four elementary school students' TPSs related to the action of force. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 24(4), 785-803   과학기술학회마을
43 Myrstad, J. A. (2004). The use of converse abduction in Kepler. Foundation of Science, 9(3), 321-338
44 Peirce, C. S. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce [abbr. CP], 8 vols. C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss(1931-1958) (Eds.) vols. 1-6; A. W. Burks (1931-1958) (Ed.) vols. 7-8, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
45 Joung, Y. J., & Song, J. (2006b). Exploring the implications of Pierce's abduction in science education by theoretical investigation. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 26(6), 703-722
46 Duit, R. (1991). Students' conceptual frameworks: Consequences for learning science. In S. M. Glynn, R. H. Yeany, & B. K. Britton (Eds.), The psychology of learning science (pp. 65-85). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
47 Fleer, M., & Robbins, J. (2003). "Hit and run research" with "hit and miss" results in early childhood science education. Research in Science Education, 33(4), 405-431   DOI   ScienceOn
48 Fleer, M. (1996). Fusing the boundaries between home and child care to support children's scientific learning. Research in Science Education, 16(2), 143-154
49 Jeong, J. -S., Won, H. -J., & Kwon, Y. -J. (2005). Application of the Triple Abduction Model for improving the skills of scientific hypothesis generation. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 25(5), 595-602
50 Kwon, Y. -J, Jeong, J. -S., Kang, M. -J., & Kim, Y. -S. (2003a). A grounded theory on the process of generating hypothesis: Knowledge about scientific episodes. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 23(5), 458-469
51 Yang, I. H., Jeong, J. S., Kwon, Y. J., Jeong, J. W., Hur, M., & Oh, C. H. (2006). An intensive interview study on the process of scientists` science knowledge generation. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 26(1), 88-98
52 Osborne, R. J., Bell, B. F., & Gilbert, J. K. (1983). Science teaching and children's views of the world. European Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 1-14   DOI
53 Shin, D. -H., & Kwon, Y. -J. (2006). Brain activities by the generating-process-types of scientific emotion in the pre-service teachers' hypothesis generation about biological phenomena: An fMRI study. Journal of Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 26(4), 568-580
54 Robbins, J. (2005). 'Brown paper packages'? A sociocultural perspective on young children's ideas in science. Research in Science Education, 35(2-3), 151-172   DOI
55 Andersson, B. (1986). The experiential gestalt of causation: a common core to pupils' preconceptions in science. European Journal of Science Education, 8(2), 155-171   DOI   ScienceOn
56 Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 296-316   DOI   ScienceOn
57 Sherin, B. (2006). Common sense clarified: the role of intuitive knowledge in physics problem solving. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 43(6). 535-555   DOI   ScienceOn
58 Howard, E. W. (1987). Concepts and schemata. London: Cassell Educational
59 Medin, D. L, & Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning. Psychological Review, 86, 207-238
60 Oh, P. S., & Kim, C. J. (2005). A theoretical study on abduction as an inquiry method in earth science. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 25(5), 610-623
61 French, L. (2004). Science as the center of coherent, integrated early childhood curriculum. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(1), 138-149   DOI   ScienceOn
62 Rogoff, B. (1998). Cognition as a collaborative process. In W. Damon (Chief Ed.), D. Kuhn, & R. S. Siegler (Volume Eds.), Cognition, perceptions and language. 5 th Ed., Handbook of child psychology (pp. 679-744). New York: Wiley
63 Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press