1 |
Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision-making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87(3), 352-377
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
Bingle, W. H., & Gaskell, P. J. (1994). Scientific literacy for decision-making and the social construction of scientific knowledge. Science Education, 78(2), 185-201
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Kolsto, S. D. (2000). Consensus projects: Teaching science for citizenship. International Journal of Science Education, 22(6), 645-664
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Kolsto, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education, 85(3), 291-310
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Witz, K. G. (2006). The participant as ally and essentialist portraiture. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 246-268
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Witz, K. G., Goodwin, D. R, Hart, R S., & Thomas, H. S. (2001). An essentialist methodology in education-related research using in-depth interviews. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(2), 195-227
DOI
|
7 |
Zeidler, D. L., Lederman, N. G., & Taylor, S. C. (1992). Fallacies and student discourse: Conceptualizing the role of critical thinking in science education. Science Education, 76(4), 437-450
DOI
|
8 |
Prewitt, K. (1983). Civic education and scientific illiteracy. Journal of Teacher Education, 34(6), 17-20
DOI
|
9 |
American Association for the Advancement of Science(AAAS). (1989). Science for all Americans. Washington, D.C.: The author
|
10 |
Rubba, P. A. (1990). STS education in action: What researchers say to teachers. Social Education, 54(4), 201-203
|
11 |
Trachtman, L. E. (1981). The public understanding of science effort: A critique. Science Technology & Human Values, 6(36), 10-15
DOI
|
12 |
Jenkins, E. W. (1999). School science, citizenship and the public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21 (7), 703-710
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Fleming, R. (1986). Adolescent reasoning in socio-scientific issues, part II: Nonsocial cognition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 23(8), 689-698
DOI
|
14 |
Johnson, J. M. (2002). In-depth interviewing. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context & method (pp. 103-119). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
|
15 |
Zeidler, D. L. (1997). The central role of fallacious thinking in science education. Science Education, 81(4), 483-496
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education, 86(3), 343-367
DOI
ScienceOn
|
17 |
Fensham, P. J. (2002). Time to change drivers for scientific literacy. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 2(1), 9-24
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Geddis, A. N. (1991). Improving the quality of science classroom discourse on controversial issues. Science Education, 75(2), 169-183
DOI
|
19 |
National Research Council(NRC) (1996). National science education standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academic Press
|
20 |
Pedretti, E. (1999). Decision making and STS education: Exploring scientific knowledge and social responsibility in schools and science centers through and issue-based approach. School Science & Mathematics, 99(4), 174-181
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Gayford, C. (1993). Discussion-based group work related to environmental issues in science classes with 15-year-old pupils in England. International Journal of Science Education, 15(5), 521-529
DOI
ScienceOn
|
22 |
Zeidler, D. L., & Schafer, L. E. (1984). IdentifYing mediating factors of moral reasoning in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(1), 1-15
DOI
|
23 |
Mertens, T. R., & Hendrix, J. R. (1990). The popular press, scientific literacy in human genetics, and bioethical decision-making. School Science & Mathematics, 90(4), 317-322
DOI
|
24 |
Hurd, P. D. (1986). Perspectives for the reform of science education. Phi Delta Kappan, 67(5), 353-358
|
25 |
Dass, P. M. (1997). Organizing high school biology experiences around contemporary bioethical issues: An STS approach. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 17(5-6), 325-330
DOI
|
26 |
Jenkins, E. W. (1992). School science education: Toward a reconstruction. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 24(3), 229-246
DOI
ScienceOn
|
27 |
Cross, R. T., & Price, R. F. (1999). The social responsibility of science and the public understanding of science. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), 775-785
DOI
ScienceOn
|
28 |
Solomon, J. (1992). The classroom discussion of science-based social issues presented on television: Knowledge, attitudes and values. International Journal of Science Education, 14(4), 431-444
DOI
ScienceOn
|
29 |
Yager, R. E. (1990). STS: Thinking over the years. An overview of the past decade. Science Teacher, 57(3), 52-55
|
30 |
Hurd, P. D. (1990). Guest editorial: Change and challenge in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(5), 413-414
DOI
|