Browse > Article

Using Minute Papers to Improve Lecture Demonstrations  

Hurh, Eun-Young (Seoul National University)
Soman, Sherril A. (Grand Valley State University)
Robinson, William R. (Purdue University)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.25, no.1, 2005 , pp. 16-25 More about this Journal
Abstract
Minute papers are brief papers written at the end of a lecture in response to one or two questions posed by the instructor. The answers are discussed briefly at the beginning of the next lecture. We used minute papers to follow students' understanding and response to lecture demonstrations in an introductory general chemistry course. An analysis of these minute papers suggest that the following characteristics are important, when using demonstrations as teaching aids. 1) The purpose of a demonstration should be stated as explicitly as possible. 2) Instructors should be explicit about what is happening and what students should be looking for. 3) Demonstrations should be kept as simple as possible, perhaps illustrating one concept. Finally, we note that students believe that the visual component of demonstrations enhances their comprehension of chemistry concepts.
Keywords
minute papers; lecture demonstrations; teaching aids;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Beasley, W. 1982. Teacher demonstrations: The effect on student task involvement. Journal of Chemical Education, 59, 789-790   DOI
2 Deese, William C.; Ramsey, Linda L.; Walczyk, J.; Eddy, D. 2000. Using demonstration assessments to improve learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 77, 1511-1516   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Gattis, K. W. and Park, J. C. 1998. Effectiveness of demonstrations in facilitating physics concept acquisitions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching
4 Patton, M. Q. 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
5 Roth, W. M., McRobbie, C. J., Lucas, K. B., and Boutonne, S. 1997. Why may students fail to learn from demonstrations? A social practice perspective on learning in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 509-533   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Shakhashiri, B. Z. 1983. Chemical demonstrations: a handbook for teachers of chemistry, Vol. 1 Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press
7 van Manen, M. 1990. Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy pp. 1-34. New York: State University of New York Press
8 von Glasersfeld, E. 1989. Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese 80, 121-140   DOI
9 Driver R., and Bell, B. 1986. Student's thinking and the learning of science: A constructivist view. School Science Review, 67, 443-456
10 Shepardson, D. P., Moje, E. B., and Kennard-McClelland, A. M. 1994. The impact of a science demonstration on children's understandings of air pressure. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 243-258   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Tannis, D.O. 1984. Why I do demonstrations. Journal of Chemical Education, 61, 1010
12 Erickson, F. 1986. Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock Ed., Handbook of research on teaching, Vol. 3, pp. 119-161. New York: Macmillan
13 Ramette, R.W. 1980. Exocharmic reactions. Journal of Chemical Education, 57, 68-69   DOI
14 Beall, H. 1996. Report on the WPI conference Demonstrations as a teaching tool in chemistry: Pro and con. Journal of Chemical Education, 73, 641-642   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Bodner, G. M. 2001 Why lecture demonstrations are 'exocharmic' for both students and their instructors. University Chemical Education, 5, 31-35
16 Tobias, S. and Hake, H.H. 1988. Professors as physics students: What can they teach us? American Journal of Physics, 56, 786-794   DOI
17 Bowen C. W., and Phelps, A. J. 1997. Demonstration-based cooperative testing in general chemistry: A broader assessment-of-learning technique. Journal of Chemical Education, 74, 715-719   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Driver R, and Oldham, V. 1986. A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science. Studies in Science Education, 13, 105-122   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Sanger, Michael J.; Phelps, Amy J.; Fienhold, Jason. 2000. Using a computer animation to improve students' conceptual understanding of a can-crushing demonstration. Journal of Chemical Education, 77, 1517   DOI   ScienceOn