1 |
Beasley, W. 1982. Teacher demonstrations: The effect on student task involvement. Journal of Chemical Education, 59, 789-790
DOI
|
2 |
Deese, William C.; Ramsey, Linda L.; Walczyk, J.; Eddy, D. 2000. Using demonstration assessments to improve learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 77, 1511-1516
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
Gattis, K. W. and Park, J. C. 1998. Effectiveness of demonstrations in facilitating physics concept acquisitions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching
|
4 |
Patton, M. Q. 1990. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
|
5 |
Roth, W. M., McRobbie, C. J., Lucas, K. B., and Boutonne, S. 1997. Why may students fail to learn from demonstrations? A social practice perspective on learning in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 509-533
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
Shakhashiri, B. Z. 1983. Chemical demonstrations: a handbook for teachers of chemistry, Vol. 1 Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press
|
7 |
van Manen, M. 1990. Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy pp. 1-34. New York: State University of New York Press
|
8 |
von Glasersfeld, E. 1989. Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese 80, 121-140
DOI
|
9 |
Driver R., and Bell, B. 1986. Student's thinking and the learning of science: A constructivist view. School Science Review, 67, 443-456
|
10 |
Shepardson, D. P., Moje, E. B., and Kennard-McClelland, A. M. 1994. The impact of a science demonstration on children's understandings of air pressure. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 243-258
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Tannis, D.O. 1984. Why I do demonstrations. Journal of Chemical Education, 61, 1010
|
12 |
Erickson, F. 1986. Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock Ed., Handbook of research on teaching, Vol. 3, pp. 119-161. New York: Macmillan
|
13 |
Ramette, R.W. 1980. Exocharmic reactions. Journal of Chemical Education, 57, 68-69
DOI
|
14 |
Beall, H. 1996. Report on the WPI conference Demonstrations as a teaching tool in chemistry: Pro and con. Journal of Chemical Education, 73, 641-642
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Bodner, G. M. 2001 Why lecture demonstrations are 'exocharmic' for both students and their instructors. University Chemical Education, 5, 31-35
|
16 |
Tobias, S. and Hake, H.H. 1988. Professors as physics students: What can they teach us? American Journal of Physics, 56, 786-794
DOI
|
17 |
Bowen C. W., and Phelps, A. J. 1997. Demonstration-based cooperative testing in general chemistry: A broader assessment-of-learning technique. Journal of Chemical Education, 74, 715-719
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Driver R, and Oldham, V. 1986. A constructivist approach to curriculum development in science. Studies in Science Education, 13, 105-122
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Sanger, Michael J.; Phelps, Amy J.; Fienhold, Jason. 2000. Using a computer animation to improve students' conceptual understanding of a can-crushing demonstration. Journal of Chemical Education, 77, 1517
DOI
ScienceOn
|