1 |
Chiu, M.-H.(2001). Algorithmic problem solving and conceptual understanding of chemistry by students at a local high school in Taiwan. Proceedings of the National Science Council, Republic of China Part D: Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 20-38
|
2 |
Laurillard, D.(1993). Rethinking university teaching: A framework for the effective use of educational technology. New York: Routledge
|
3 |
Reid, N. & Yang, M.-J.(2002). The solving of problems in chemistry: The more open-ended problems. Research in science & Technological Education, 20(1), 83-98
DOI
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Wolfer, A. J.(2000). Introductory college chemistry students' understanding of stoichiometry: Connections between conceptual and computational understandings and instruction. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Oregon State University
|
5 |
Zoller, U., Lubezky, A., Nakhleh, M. B., Tessier, B., & Dori, Y. J.(1995). Success on algorithmic and LOCS vs. conceptual chemistry exam questions. Journal of Chemical Education, 72(11), 987-989
DOI
|
6 |
Nakhleh, M. B., Lowrey, K. A., & Mitchell, R. C.(1996). Narrowing the gap between concepts and algorithms in freshman chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 73(8), 758-762
DOI
ScienceOn
|
7 |
송인섭(2003). 통계학의 이해. 서울: 학지사
|
8 |
Stewart, J.(1982). Two aspects of meaningful problem solving in science. Science Education, 66(7), 731-741
DOI
|
9 |
Anderson, J. R.(1995). Learning and Memory: An Integrated Approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons
|
10 |
Noh, T. & Scharmann, L. C.(1997). Instructional influence of a molecular-level pictorial presentation of matter on students' conceptions and problem-solving ability. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(2), 199-217
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Glaser, R.(1994). Learning theory and instruction. In G. d'Ydewalle, P. Eelen, & P. Bertelson (Eds.), International Perspectives on Psychological Science, Vol. 2: The state of the art (pp. 341-357). Hove, UK: Larence Erlbaum Associates
|
12 |
Pushkin, D. B.(1998), Introductory students, conceptual understanding, and algorithmic success. Journal of Chemical Education, 75(7), 809-810
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
Dukes, P., Pritchard, D. E., & Morote, E.-S.(2002). Inductive influence of related quantitative and conceptual problems. A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (New Orleans, LA, April 6-10), ED 463978
|
14 |
Gagne, E. D., Yekovish, C. W., & Yekovish, F. R.(1993). The Cognitive Psychology of School Learning. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers
|
15 |
Heyworth, R. M.(1999). Procedural and conceptual knowledge of expert and novice students for the solving of a basic problem in chemistry. International Journal of Science Education, 21(2), 195-211
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
Nurrenbem, S. C. & Pickering, M.(1987). Concept learning versus problem solving: Is there a difference? Journal of Chemical Education, 64(6), 508-510
DOI
|
17 |
Neto, A. & Valente, M. O.(1997). Problem solving in physics: Towards a metacognitively developed approach. A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (70th, Oak Brook, IL, March 21-24), ED 405217
|
18 |
Kim, E. & Pak, S.-J.(2002). Students do not overcome conceptual difficulties after solving 1000 traditional problems. American Journal of Physics, 70(7), 759-765
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
Schrader, C. L.(1987). Using algorithms to teach problem solving. Journal of Chemical Education, 64(6), 518-519
DOI
|
20 |
Beall, H. & Prescott, S.(1994). Concepts and calculations in chemistry teaching and learning. Journal of Chemical Education, 71(2), 111-112
DOI
ScienceOn
|
21 |
Nakhleh, M. B.(1993). Are our students conceptual thinkers or algorithmic problem solvers? Journal of Chemical Education, 70(1), 52-55
DOI
|
22 |
Niaz, M.(1995). Progressive transitions from algorithmic to conceptual understanding in student ability to solve chemistry problems: A Lakatosian interpretation. Science Education, 79(1), 19-36
DOI
ScienceOn
|