Browse > Article

A Study on Students Scientific Reasoning in Solving Pendulum Task  

Yang, Il-Ho (Korea National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.23, no.4, 2003 , pp. 430-441 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of students' prior knowledge on scientific reasoning in solving a pendulum task with a computer simulation. Subjects were 60 Korean students: 27 fifth-grade students from an elementary school and 33 seventh grade students from a middle school located in a city with 300,000 people. This study adapted a pendulum task presented with a computer simulation on which subjects would use a pattern of multivariable causal inferences. The subjects were interviewed individually in a three-phase structured interview by the researcher and three assistants while he/she was investigating the pendulum task. This study showed that most students across grades focused heavily on demonstrating the primacy of their prior knowledge or their current hypothesis. In addition, students' theories that are part of one's prior knowledge have a significant impact on formulating, testing, and revising hypotheses. Therefore, this study supported the notion that students' prior knowledge had a strong effect on students' experimental intent and hypothesis evaluation.
Keywords
prior knowledge; scientific reasoning; hypothesis generation; pendulum;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Bruner, J. S., Goodnow, J. J., & Austin, G. A. (1956). A study of thinking. Wiley, New York, 330 p
2 Njoo, M., & de Jong, T. (1993). Exploratory learning with a computer simulation for control theory: Learning processes and instructional support. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 821-844   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Sodian, B., Zaitchik, D., & Carey, S. (1991). Young children's differentiation of hypothetical beliefs from evidence. Child Development, 62, 753-766   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Germann, P. J., Haskins, S., & Auls, S. (1996). Analysis of nine high school biology laboratory manuals: Promoting scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(5), 475-499   DOI
5 Kuhn, D., Schauble, L., & Garcia-Mila, M. (1992). Cross-domain development of scientific reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 285-327   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Staer, H., Goodrum, D., & Hackling, M. (1998). High school laboratory work in Western Australia: Openness to inquiry. Research in Science Education, 28(2), 219-228   DOI
7 Klayman, J., & Ha, Y. W. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94, 211-228   DOI
8 Penner, D. E., and Klahr, D. (1996). The interaction of domain-specific knowledge and domain-general discovery strategies: A study with sinking objects. Child Development, 67, 2709-2727   DOI   ScienceOn
9 De Jong, T., & Van Joolingen, W. R (1998). Scientific discovery learning with a computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179-201   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Klein, P. D. (1998). The role of children's theory of mind in science experimentation. Journal of Experimental Education, 66(2), 101-124   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Kuhn, D., Garcia-Mila, M., Zohar, A. & Andersen, C. (1995). Strategies of knowledge acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 60(4), 1-128   DOI
12 Schauble, L., Glaser, R., Duschl, R. A., & Schulze, S. (1995). Students understanding of the objectives and procedures of experimentation in the science classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4, 131-166   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Schauble, L., Klopfer, L.E., & Raghavan, K. (1991). Student transition from an engineering model to a science model of experimentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 859-882   DOI
14 Klahr, D., & Dunbar, K. (1988). Dual space search during scientific reasoning. Cognitive Science, 12, 1-48   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Klahr, D., Fay, A. L., & Dunbar, K.(1993). Heuristics for scientific experimentation: A developmental study. Cognitive Psychology, 25, 111-146   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., & O'Loughlin, M. (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills. Academic Press, London, 249 P