[KSCI] Korea Science Citation Index Service

A Meta-Analysis of Research on the Impact of Microcomputer-Based Laboratory in Science Teaching and Learning

Han, Hyo-Soon (Myongji University)

Publication Information

Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.23, no.4, 2003 , pp. 375-385 More about this Journal

Abstract

In an effort to provide information about the effect of Microcomputer-Based Laboratory (MBL) use in science teaching and learning on student achievement and attitudes, a review of research analyzed studies was done between 1981 and 2001, using a meta-analysis procedure. Thirty-seven published and unpublished studies were reviewed. Use of MBL was shown to be potentially effective in the following condition of class; two students, physics teaching, more than one topic, or at the college level. Appropriate research design strategies, financial support (including hardware and software), and the use of more than one instrument for assessing the effect of the MBL instruction are crucial factors for more informative research studies. While helpful in many respects, the prior research revealed a number of problems related to the use of MBL in school science teaching and learning. The prior research does not support the desired intention described in the theory-based outcomes and reveals so little about how teachers and students use MBL, how it influences their teaching and learning, and how effectively it fits into the existing science curriculum. In order to know if the integration of MBL in the existing school science is worth it or not, more careful research design and comprehensive research should be done.

Keywords

Microcomputer-Based Laboratory (MBL); science education; CAI; meta-analysis;

Citations & Related Records

Reference

1	Anderson, R. D., Kahl, S. R., Glass, G. V, & Smith, M. L. (1983). Science Education: A meta-analysis of major questions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(5), 379-385 DOI
2	$Biostat^{TM}$ , (2000). 'Comprehensive META ANALYSIS' , Software for meta-analysis
3	Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press
4	Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications
5	Nachmias, R., & Linn, M. C. (1988). Evaluations of science laboratory data: The role of computer-presented information. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(5), 491-506 DOI
6	Roblyer, M. D., Castine, W. H., & King, F. J. (1988). Assessing the impact of computer-based instruction. Computers in the Schools, 5(3-4), 1-133 DOI
7	Thornton, R. K., & Sokoloff, D. R. (1990). Learning motion concepts using real-time microcomputer-based laboratory tools. American Journal of Physics, 58(9), 858-867 DOI
8	Tinker, R. F. (1992). Science for children: The promise of technology. In K. Sheingold, S. M. Malcom, & L. G. Roberts (Eds.), Technology for teaching and learning: Papers form the 1991 AAAS Forum for School Science (pp. 11-30). Washington, DC: AAAS
9	Thornton, R. K. (1987). Tools for scientific thinking - microcomputer-based laboratories for physics teaching. Physics Education, 22(4), 230-238 DOI ScienceOn
10	Daiute, C. (1985). Do writers talk to themselves. In S. W. Freedman (ed.), The acquisition of written language: Response and revision. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Pub. Co
11	Tinker, R. F. (1987). Educational technology and the future of science education. School Science and Mathematics, 87, 466-476 DOI
12	Linn, M. C. (1998). The impact of technology on science instruction: Historical trends and current opportunities. In B. J. Fraser and K. G Tobin (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education, (pp. 265-294) Dordrecht: Kluwer
13	Berger, C. F., Lu, C. R., Belzer, S. J., & Voss, B. E. (1994). Research on the uses of technology in science education. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 466-490). New York: Macmillan
14	Shymansky, J. A., Kyle, W. C., Jr. & Alpert, J. M. (1983). The effects of new science curricula on student performance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(5), 481-451 DOI
15	Dexter, S. & Anderson, R. (1998, April). Teachers' views on the influence of computers on changes in their instructional practice. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, San Diego
16	Kelly, G. J., & Crawford, T. (1997). An ethnographic investigation of the discourse processes of school science. Science Education, 81(51), 533-559 DOI ScienceOn
17	Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computer and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books
18	Linn, M. C., Layman, J. W., & Nachmias, R. (1987). Cognitive consequences of microcomputer-based laboratories: Graphing skills development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 12, 244-253 DOI
19	Rogers, L. T. (1995). The computer as an aid for exploring graphs. School Science Review, 76, 31-39
20	Weller, H. G. (1996). Assessing the impact of computer-based learning in science. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28, 461-485 DOI
21	Riel, M. M. (1985). Computer networks and elementary school writers. In S. W. Freedman (Ed.), The acquisition of written language: Response and revision. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Pub. Co.
22	Hedges, Larry V. (1982). Statistical Methodology in Meta-Analysis. Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ
23	Tinker, R. F. (1981). Microcomputers in the teaching lab. The Physics Teacher, 19(2), 94-105 DOI
24	Bigum, C. (1998). Boundaries, barriers and borders: Teaching science in a wired world. Australian Science Teachers' Journal, 44(1), 13-24
25	Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1987). Review of recent research literature on computer-based instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 12(3), 222-230 DOI
26	Glass, G. V. (1976). Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research. Review of Research in Science Education, 5, 351-379