Browse > Article

Developing A Framework for Performance Assessment in Science Education  

Kim, Eun-Jin (Busan National University of Education)
Park, Hyun-Ju (Chosun University)
Kang, Ho-Kam (Gyeongin National University of Education)
Noh, Suk-Goo (Gyeongin National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.23, no.4, 2003 , pp. 319-330 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to develop a Framework for Performance Assessment in Science Education(FPASE). Science educators in the past have paid more attention to science curriculum and teaching strategies than assessment. In recent years, attention has turned toward performance assessment which addresses the concerns of science curriculum and instruction, and which is consistent with goals of science education at various levels of interests. Science educators are trying to do performance assessment, yet they don't have a framework that is highly qualified in terms of science educational objectives for the future, and advantages of performance assessment. We, therefore, have developed a framework for performance assessment in science education, which may be useful for science teachers to understand and assess their students' abilities. We have extracted seven domains covering students' various abilities as the important objectives of science performance assessment and grouped them into three categories: General, Science specific, and Intermediate abilities. And we developed a F-PASE with a three dimensional solid figured structure, and illustrated it as the configuration of a com. F-PASE is useful for science teachers to develop and select a science performance assessment as well as have a more advanced understanding of their students' abilities. It is a creative and novel assessment framework in terms of structure, configuration, functions and meanings. It also suggests a new vision of an assessment framework in science education.
Keywords
science education goals; performance assessment; objectives framework;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Baron, M. A., & Boschee, F. (1995). Authentic assessment: The key to unlocking student success. USA: Technomic Publishing Co. Inc.
2 BSS(Britanica Science System). (1995). FOSS(Full Option Science System), NH, USA.: Delta Education Inc.
3 Driver, R., & Bell, B. (1986). Students' thinking and the learning of science: A constructivist view. School Science Review, 67, 443-456
4 Glatthorn, A. A., Bragaw, D., Dawkins, K., & Parker, J. (1998). Performance assessment and standards-based currucula: The achievement cycle. Larchmont, NY: Eye On Education
5 KDE(Kentucky Department of Education). (1991). Learning goals and valued outcomes. Lexington, Ky; Department of Education
6 KSES(Kangwon Sangcheon Elementary School). (1997). Performance Assessment Instrument for Elementary School. Report of a model school of education assessment
7 Glaser, R. (1984). Education and thnking: The role of knowledge. American Psychologist, 39, 93-104   DOI
8 Berk, R. A. (1986). Performance assessment: Methods and applications. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press
9 IJES(Inchon Jakjeon Elementary School). (1997). Performance Assessment Instrument for Elementary School
10 Birenbaum, M.(1996). Assessment 2000: Towards a pluralistic approach to assessment. In M. Birenbaum & F. J. R. C. Dochy (Eds.), Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes and prior knowledge (pp, 3-29). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers
11 Kim, E. J. (2000). Developmental of Framework for Performance Assessment in Science Education. Unpublished. Doctoral Dissertation at Seoul National University
12 Kim, J. H. (1999). Performance Assessment in Biology Education: The theory and practice of performance assessment. 1999 Summer Conference of Korean Society of Biology Education
13 Resnick, L. B. (1989). Knowing, Learning, and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Rober Glaser, Hilsdale, NJ: Eribaum
14 Baron, B. J. (1991). Performance assement: Blurring the edges of assessment, curriculum, and instruction. In G. Kulm & S. M. Malcom (Eds.), Science Assessment in the Service of Reform, PP. 246-266
15 Champagne, A. B., Lovitts, B. E., & Calinger, B. J. (1990). Assessement in the service of instruction. Washington D. C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science
16 IHES(Inchon Hwajeon Elementary School). (1997). Performance Assessment Instrument for Elementary School
17 Kim, C., Lee, H., & Kim, Y. (1991). Science Learning Evaluation, Seoul; Kyoyuk Kwahak Sa
18 NSRC (1995). The unit of Weather in Science & Technology for Children, Teacher s Guide: In STC(Science Technology for Children), Carolina Biological Supply Company
19 Kim, Y. S. (1998). Qualitative Research of Science Performance Assessment in Korea. Unpublished Master thesis at Korea National University of Education
20 KFTA(Korea Federation of Teacher's Associations). (1998). Performance assessment materials for improvement of self- learning ability. Sea Gyo Sil
21 Wiggins & Grant. (1993). Assessment: Authenticity, context and validity. Phi Delta Kappan, 200-214
22 Bloom, B., Hastings, J., & Madaus, G. (1971). Handbook of formative and summative evaluation of student learning, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill
23 Phillips, D.(1987). Socialization of perceived academic competence among highly competent children. Child Development, 58, 1308-1320   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Driver, R. (1989). Students' conceptions and the learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11,481-490   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Toffler, A. (1998). The third wave. Bantam Books. translated by Kim, J. W. The third wave. Seoul: Beom Woo As
26 Chittenden, E. (1991). Authentic assessment, evaluation, and documentation of student performance. In V. Perrone (Eds.), Expanding student assessment. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development
27 IEA (1997). Performance assessment in IEA's Third International Mathematics & Science Study(TIMSS), Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS International Study Center
28 Lim, Y., Cho, H., Hann, A., Park, H., Song, M., Kim, E., Hong, S., Kang, H., & Non, S. (1999). Survey on authentic performance assessment for elementary science education, Journal of elementary science education, 18(1), 41-51
29 Guilford, J. P. (1988). Some changes in the structure-of-intellectual model. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 1-6   DOI
30 CSBE(California State Board of Education). (1990). Science framework: for California public schools: kindergarten through grade twelve
31 Roth, W. M. (1995). Authentic school science. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers
32 Toffler, A. (1986). Future shock. Bantam Books, translated by Jang, E. B. Future shock. Seoul: Beom Woo As
33 Wolf, K. (1994). Teaching portpolios: Capturing the complexity of teaching. In L. Ingvarson & R. Chadbourne (Eds.), Valuing teachers' work: New directions in teacher appraisal, Australian Council for Educational Research, Melbourne, Australia, 112-136
34 Doll. Jr. W. E. (1993). A post-modern perspective on curriculum, NY: Teacher College Press