Browse > Article

The Development of the Compensational Thinking Through the Compensation activities of 'Thinking Science' Program  

Kim, sun-Ja (Korea National University of Education)
Lee, Sang-Kwon (Korea National University of Education)
Park, Jong-Yoon (Ewha Womans University)
Kang, Seong-Joo (Korea National University of Education)
Choi, Byung-Soon (Korea National University of Education)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education / v.22, no.3, 2002 , pp. 604-616 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze the development of the compensational thinking by the compensation activities of 'Thinking Science' program. The 138 students were sampled in elementary schools and were divided into two groups, the experimental group of 74 students and the control group of 64 students. Both the compensation activities of the 'Thinking Science' program and a regular science curriculum were implemented to the experimental group, while only a regular science curriculum to the control group. Both experimental and control group were pre-tested with Science Reasoning Task II and compensational thinking test I and were post-tested with compensational thinking test II. This study revealed that the types of strategies used in compensation problem solving were categorized as illogical explanation, rule automation, proportionality, explanation in qualitative terms, additive quantification, inverse proportionality and were related to the context of the items. It was found that compensation activities of the 'Thinking Science' program were effective on the development of the compensational thinking.
Keywords
elementary science education; compensation; thinking science; CASE;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 한종하(1978). 과학적 사고. 서울대학교 과학교육연구소. 과학교육연구논총. 3(2), 31-38
2 Adey, P. & Shayer, M.(1994). Really rasing standards. Routledge: London
3 Barda, V.(1987). Comparison of the development of ratioconcepts in two domains. Science Education, 71(4), 599-613   DOI
4 Jones, G. A., Langrall, C. W., Thornton, C. A., & Mogill, T. A.(1999). Student' s probabilistic thinking in instruction. Journal of Research in Mathmatics Education, 30(5), 487-519   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Shayer, M. & Adey, P.(1992a). Accelerating the development of formal thinking in middle and high school students II: Postproject effects on science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(1), 81-92   DOI
6 김현재, 장경례(1991). 인지가속자료 적용을 통한 논리적 사고의 지도 효과. 한국초등과학교육학회지, 10(2), 159-173
7 정행기(2000). 비례 문제의 상황과 내용 친숙성에 따른 초등학생의 비례 논리 발달 조사. 한국교원대학교 석사 학위 논문
8 김영식(1999). 아동의 인지 수준에 따른 변인통제 능력의 형성과 특수전이 효과에 관한 연구. 한국교원대학교 석사 학위 논문
9 조성남(2000). 비례논리 학습 프로그램에 의한 초등학교 6학년 학생의 비례논리 형성 및 지속 효과. 한국교원대학교 석사 학위 논문
10 김언주, 강영하, 최건수(1992). 인지발달과 교육. 양서원
11 Ferrandez-Reinisch, A. M.(1985). The acquisition of inverse proportionality: A training experiment. Journal of Research in Mathmatics Education. 16, 133-140
12 최미화, 최병순(1998). CASE 프로젝트 고찰. 화학교육, 25(4), 228-232   PUBMED
13 Shayer, M. & Adey, P.(1992b). Accelerating the development of formal thinking in middle and high school students III: Testing the permanency of effects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(10), 1101-1115   DOI
14 최병순, 허명(1987). 중학생들의 인지 수준과 과학교과 내용과의 관계 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 7(1), 19-32
15 Shayer, M.(1996). The long-term effects of cognitive acceleration on pupils' school achievement. Center for the Advancement of Thinking, King's College: London
16 Silverman, I. W. & Rose, A. P.(1982). Compensation and Conservation. Psychological-Bulletin, 91(1), 80-101   DOI
17 Adey, P., Shayer, M., & Yates, C.(1989). Thinking science. Macmillian Education LTD: London
18 Shayer, M., Demetriou, A., & Pervez, M.(1988). The structure and scailing of concrete operational thought: Three studies in four countries. Genetic, Social and General Psychological Monograghs, 114(3), 309-375
19 Sweller, J.(1989). Cognitive technology: Some procedures for facilitating learning and problem solving in mathematics and science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 457-466   DOI
20 Roadrangka, V., Yeany, R. H., & Padilla, M. J.(1983). The construction and validation of Group Assessment of Logical thinking(GALT). Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the NARST
21 Shayer, M. & Adey, P.(1993). Accelerating the development of formal thinking in middle and high school students IV: Three years after a two-year intervention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(4), 351-366   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Wylam, H. & Shayer, M.(1978). CSMS Science Reasoning Tasks General Guide. NFER Publishing Co, Chelsea College: London
23 김영준(2001). CASE 프로그램의 적용과정에서 아동의 인지수준과 아동-교사의 상호작용이 문제해결과 논리적 사고력에 미치는 영향. 한국교원대학교 박사 학위 논문
24 최재환, 이운환, 김애자(1993). 국민학교 아동의 지적 발달과 자연과 교과서 내용과의 비교. 한국초등과학교육학회지, 12(2), 127-144
25 Longeot, F.(1978). Les tsandes operatoires de Piaget et les factures de I'intelligence. Press Universitaires de Grenoble: Grenoble