Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.36623/KSSR.2020.62.13

A Study on Security Performance of Registered Security Guards in the Government Buildings  

Chae, Jeong-Seok (경기대학교 대학원 경호보안학과)
Choi, Yeon-Jun (경기대학교 시큐리티매니지먼트전공)
Publication Information
Korean Security Journal / v., no.62, 2020 , pp. 295-320 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the influence which affects security performance of registered security guards hired by government buildings via job engagement so that basic data can be provided to improve their security performance. To accommodate this study, a survey was conducted from November 26th to December 27th, 2019 through the cooperation of registered security guards working in government buildings in Seoul, Gwacheon, Daejeon, and Sejong. A total of 234 survey sheets were collected and 28 sheets out of them had missing data or incomplete data so a subsequent total of 206 survey sheets were used in this analysis. SPSS 23.0 was applied making use of the collected data for frequency and descriptive statistics analysis, trustworthiness analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and correlation analysis. By applying AMOS 23.0, a means to examine the structural relation between organization, job engagement, and security performance were able to be analyzed. The result of this study is as follows. First, it was found that organizational justice gives a meaningful positive (+) influence on job engagement for registered security guards. Second, it was found that job engagement for registered security guards gives them a meaningful positive(+) influence in their security performance. Third, it was found that organizational justice does not give any meaningful influence on security performance directly. Fourth, organizational justice does not give any meaningful influence on security performance directly but it gives meaningful positive(+) influence on security performance via job engagement as it takes the role of full mediation variable. Based on the results, in order to maximize security performance of registered security guards, this study recommends that government building administrators to try their best to propose to the National Assembly a proposition for Police Assigned for registered security guards Act to be legalized in order to improve the leveling system of registered security guards so that registered security guards can have more job engagement.
Keywords
The Government Building; Registered Security Guard; Organizational Justice; Job Engagement; Security Performance;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 4  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Greenberg, J. (1990). Looking fair Vs. being fair: Managing impressions of organizational justice. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 111-157.
2 Harter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business Unit-Level Relationship Between Employee Satisfaction, Employee Engagement and Business Outcome: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 268-279.   DOI
3 Kabanoff, B. (1991). Equity, equality, power, and conflict. Academy of Management Review, 16, 416-441.   DOI
4 Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.   DOI
5 Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(1), 3-30.   DOI
6 Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S. (2000). Integrating Justice and Social Exchange: The Differing Effects of Fair Procedures and Treatment on Work Relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 738-748.   DOI
7 McBain, R. (2007). The practice of engagement: Research in to current employee engagement practice. Strategie HR Review, 6(6), 16-19.   DOI
8 Rupp, D. E., & Cropanzano, R. (2002). The Mediating Effects of Social Exchange Relationships in Predicting Workplace Outcomes from Multifoci Organizational Justice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89(1), 925-946.   DOI
9 Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619.   DOI
10 Saunders, M. N. K., & Thornhill, A. (2003). Organizational justice, trust and the management of change: An exploration. Personnel Review, 32(3), 360-375.   DOI
11 나기환 (2016). 공무원 직무열의의 선행 및 결과요인에 관한 연구. 호서대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
12 Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92.   DOI
13 Zhong, L., Wayne, S. J., & Liden, R. C. (2016). Job engagement, perceived organizational support, high-performance human resource practices, and cultural value orientations: A cross-level investigation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(6), 823-844.   DOI
14 국방부 (2019). 국가중요시설 지정 및 방호훈령.
15 강다연, 장명희 (2016). 해운항만조직의 정보보안이행이 정보보안성과에 미치는 영향. 한국항해항만학회지, 40(4), 213-222.   DOI
16 권현식 (2016). 항공테러 대비 공항운영자 및 경찰의 역량강화 방안 연구: 항공 보안검색을 중심으로. 경찰학논총, 11(3), 325-354.
17 박무규 (2018). 호텔기업의 인적자원관리시스템이 직무열의에 미치는 영향: 조직공정성의 조절효과. 관광경영연구, 80, 281-303.
18 이정훈, 이민형, 김성우 (2014). 항만보안 인력의 전문화를 위한 교육시스템 개선방안. 융합보안논문지, 14(6), 31-39.
19 박재곤 (2019). 조직문화가 보안성과에 미치는 영향 연구: 군인 가치관의 매개효과를 중심으로. 시큐리티연구, 58, 215-241.
20 이랑, 김완석, 신강현 (2006). 직무탈진과 직무열의의 요구-자원 모델에서 정서노동전략의 역할. 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 19(4), 573-596.
21 이지우 (2010). 직무열의(Job engagement)의 연구 동향과 과제. 경영경제, 43(1), 167-191.
22 전용대 (2015). 성과측정시스템의 상호작용적 이용과 업무성과간의 관계: 공정성, 조직몰입, 직무만족의 매개효과. 경상대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
23 정성배 (2015). 산업보안 관리활동이 기업의 보안성과와 업무효율성에 미치는 영향. 용인대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
24 정홍술 (2002). 분배.절차.상호작용공정성이 상사에 대한 신뢰, 조직지원인식 및 조직시민 행동에 미치는 영향. 전남대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
25 채정석, 이주락 (2019). 공항 특수경비원의 보안성과에 관한 연구. 한국산업보안연구, 9(1), 95-116.
26 최연준 (2018). 국가중요시설의 물리보안 수준과 보안정책 준수의지가 보안성과에 미치는 영향. 경기대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
27 Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M. (1996). Two faces of the powerless: Coping with Tyranny. CA: Power and Influence in Organizations, 203-219.
28 추재엽 (2017). 조직문화와 조직공정성이 조직효과성에 미치는 영향: 조직커뮤니케이션과 임파워먼트의 매개효과를 중심으로. 한양대학교 대학원 박사학위논문.
29 Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz(Ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 272-283.
30 Alfawaz, S., Nelson, K., & Mohannak, K. (2010). Information Security Culture : A Behavior Compliance Conceptual Framework. 8th Australasian Information Security Conference, 105.
31 Bonner, S. E., & Sprinkler, G. B. (2002). The effects of monetary incentives on effort and task Performance on theories, evidence, and a framework for research. Accounting Organizations and Society, 27(4-5), 303-345.   DOI
32 Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen and J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 136-162.
33 Chew, E., Swanson, M., Stine, K., Bartol, N., Brown, A., & Robinson, W. (2008). Performance Measurement Guide for Information Security. Special Publication(NIST SP), 800(55).
34 Eskew, D. E. (1993). The role of organizational justice in organizational citizenship behavior. Employee Responsibilities and Rights, 6(3), 185-195.   DOI
35 Folger, R., & Konovsky, M. (1989). Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions. Academy of Management Journal, 32(1), 137-149.
36 Garcia-Lzquierdo, A. L., Moscoso, S., & Ramos-Villagrasa, P. J. (2012). Reactions to the Fairness of Promotion Methods: Procedural Justice and Job Satisfaction. International. Journal of Selection and Assesment, 20(4), 394-403.   DOI